NCFZ

7 ms·

1.
by NCFZ 20d ago
I’m not a lawyer either but I think the introduction section of the ruling seems to address your questions in a somewhat accessible manner. Specifically the last two paragraphs of the intro section. https://storage.courtlistener.
2.
by NCFZ 3mo ago
> It's not being aggressive, it's just trying throwing shit at problems until it sticks... or doesn't. The vast majority of the work the agent did was to reproduce the issue using the limited tooling it had access to. I do
3.
by NCFZ 5mo ago
It was explained in the post
4.
by NCFZ 8mo ago
Aside from the confusing conflation of sums and rates mentioned in other replies, your argument assumes that correlations are transitive and exhaustive—i.e., that because socioeconomic status correlates with crime, any group with lower crim
5.
by NCFZ 2y ago
>She said they presented no proof to back up their claims that the government had pressured social media companies like Twitter and Facebook into restricting their speech. “Unfortunately,” she said, the Fifth Circuit court of appeals “re
6.
by NCFZ 2y ago
If it's so clear cut then why did SCOTUS throw that case out?
7.
by NCFZ 2y ago
Which statistics are you talking about? According to the article, the only statistics available are from self reported data.
8.
by NCFZ 2y ago
Maybe competence with respect to having the instructors be certified. Or at least trained by people whose credentials aren't suspended. It's interesting you focus on the alcohol claim but not any of the accusations mentioned in th
9.
by NCFZ 5y ago
This is what I do as well. I find it works better than fractional scaling.
10.
by NCFZ 5y ago
aliens...
11.
by NCFZ 5y ago
There is a global chip shortage. Apple has said the shortage would impact their products.
12.
by NCFZ 5y ago
I was surprised. I wasn't expecting a major tech company who's website is plastered with things about "valuing diversity" to be one to pick a fight over a such a minor requirement in a gender equality law.
13.
by NCFZ 5y ago
True, but the most of the examples people found are of companies that already have Colorado employees.
14.
Companies excluding Coloradans from remote jobs to avoid sharing salary ranges(reddit.com)
446 points by NCFZ 5y ago|394 comments
15.
by NCFZ 5y ago
I had a laptop with a similar amd cpu and even though it was rated for the same wattage, it was a lot more inefficient. The laptop would get warm just watching youtube videos and the fans would always kick on. In contrast to the M1 which is
16.
by NCFZ 6y ago
This nonsense has been debunked weeks ago. https://www.factcheck.org/2020/03/trumps-misplaced-blame-on-... There was no rule anyone has found that restricted other labs from testing.