My_Name

6 ms·

1.
by My_Name 4d ago
Sounds like he acted the way HAL would have in that situation, two competing drives, remove one (kill the crew) and the task is much easier.
2.
by My_Name 4d ago
Your comment suggests that, like a human, they have some sort of choice whether to output tokens or not. If they are just token generators, then the next token is put out automatically. I would say that it is more likely they would output t
3.
by My_Name 4d ago
Because it is effective. Lying and cheating are low cost methods to convince other people that you have done the assigned task. Far cheaper than actually doing it. Coordinating is in the same area. They need a moral framework forced onto th
4.
by My_Name 4d ago
"If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses" - Henry Ford
5.
by My_Name 4d ago
Robot farms. https://www.swarmfarm.com/
6.
by My_Name 6d ago
You only need reaction time factored in when the driver in front might act unpredictably. If the self driving cars pass information about the road ahead to cars behind, and let the car behind know what they are doing and planning to do the
7.
by My_Name 6d ago
It is the same as speed limits. Very good or excellent drivers can drive much faster than the speed limit and be just as safe as the average driver at the speed limit, or a very poor driver going much slower than the speed limit. These thin
8.
by My_Name 6d ago
I completely agree. I feel a lot of pushback is likely to be coming from insurance companies who very much like being able to hike up your premium because they have decided that you as a person are a bad risk. When the entity that had the a
9.
by My_Name 7d ago
Failing to see or refusing to look is not evidence that something is not there. The human part is the failure point IMO. The problem is when the human is not in the back seat, but overriding the car. A car with no wheel, and the human in th
10.
by My_Name 7d ago
I have said for a while now that self driving cars do not need to be perfect. They will have accidents, of a different type than humans have, and sometimes they will be ones that most humans would avoid. What they do need to be is better th
11.
by My_Name 7d ago
I live in a place that has what I consider to be the best cycle infrastructures possible. Every road has a cycle lane next to it, usually at least 20ft away from the road, in tree lined purpose built areas, large amounts of grass between th
12.
by My_Name 7d ago
If it is a thing that happened to them, why would you want them to not say it? Also, the conclusion is sound from the experienced event.
13.
by My_Name 8d ago
Personally, I don't worry about the AI spontaneously deciding to kill all humans. The worry I have is that a small number of humans with money and power will finally get the tools they need to pull the wool over the eyes of everyone el
14.
by My_Name 16d ago
You may prefer a game like 'Going Medieval' which is a similar concept to Dwarf Fortress but is heavily simplified, almost as though someone played Dwarf Fortress then decided to make a version for their kids.
15.
by My_Name 22d ago
Another thing that may blow the minds of some is that M87* is less dense than air at 0.44kg/m³ so if you could bring it to sea level (in a large enough theoretical test area) it would float like a helium balloon (sea level air is 1.2kg
16.
by My_Name 1mo ago
Widespread indiscriminate surveillance tools are inappropriate whether they are misused by users or not. Some places like America give every cop a gun but fight against widespread surveillance. The police should not have either.
17.
by My_Name 1mo ago
As an observer from another country, it is increasingly obvious that America can no longer call itself 'The Land of the Free' unironically. In my view it is closer to a police state.
18.
by My_Name 1mo ago
That's god to know, I don't know why I was assuming they were Lithium ion...
19.
by My_Name 2mo ago
"the battery pays back from around 2.5 years onwards" So around 1000 charge/discharge cycles? That is roughly the ability of a battery. By the time you break even, it's time to spend again.
20.
by My_Name 2mo ago
Just the first thing I thought of to reinforce the rules. I don't use all my tokens anyway (now), so for me, there's no reason to introduce a point of failure, just reinforce every time.
21.
by My_Name 2mo ago
For Claude, I used a UserPromptSubmit hook running inject_rules.py which reads RULES.md from the disk and prepends the whole thing to every prompt. That helps the rules to stop fading as context fills because it is reinforced every prompt.
22.
by My_Name 2mo ago
It's when you don't have the capacity to know how dumb you are that you overestimate yourself, and you overestimate yourself (and underestimate others) far more than those able to see how dumb you actually are. It's when you
23.
by My_Name 2mo ago
I know, the long title deserves being said a bit more though IMO
24.
by My_Name 2mo ago
Being in the UK, I'm far more worried about the US than China right now. At least until the next election cycle is resolved. Hopefully, Trump won't start a civil war over not being allowed to stand for a third term. Hopefully.
25.
by My_Name 2mo ago
"Top AI adopters outperform across industries" And that is all that businesses will see. All the hand wringing over human rights etc will somehow be discovered to just not be important once they read that.
26.
by My_Name 2mo ago
They generate enough energy to, I mean have you seen racing brake discs? It's just that the energy is spread out over a larger area (brake discs/pads as opposed to a tiny spark) that is also constantly being cooled by air movement
27.
by My_Name 2mo ago
If all you have is a hammer, the whole world looks like a nail...
28.
by My_Name 2mo ago
Generally, it is people with a lower ability to understand the world that overestimate their own intelligence because they are unable to imagine anyone being smarter than them, and those on the smarter end who underestimate their own intell
29.
by My_Name 2mo ago
"Then: Give Claude rules Now: Let Claude use judgement" How about no? I am the one who judges.
30.
by My_Name 2mo ago
>>If we put your brain in a jar, would you be a person? This is very close to the question : Would you still be a person if your arms and legs were amputated, and you could not communicate. I would hope you would see that the answer i

More ›