Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
MustardTiger
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
1.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
Please be more patient :) Replying to posts you didn't read will not help us, definitely.
2.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
Just because some people have a different opinion than you, doesn't mean it is due to fallacious reasoning. Ultimately, it seems to come down to rust haters who have a sunken cost fallacy - I spent years writing bad code in bad lanagu
3.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
>We're exactly talking about fire codes. No we're not. That poster pointed out how fire codes helped, but that most codes do not. We're talking about building codes. >But fair, let's talk about lumber stamps. How
4.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
No, they were done because of lobbying from the lumber industry. If you have any evidence that stamped lumber is superior in any way I would love to see it. Because if you've ever built a house, you'd know you have to throw away
5.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
Acceptable as a source of lumber to build a house. You know, like the article we're discussing?
6.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
It really makes no sense. Quinoa has no upsides here, it is just fashionable with a small number of faux health nuts.
7.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
But we're not talking about fire codes, we're talking about building codes. The stamp on lumber does not make it less flammable.
8.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
>This isn't about building codes. It's about stickers and permits That is the building code. It is all about stickers and stamps. Why is a tree that grew on my land that I cut myself not acceptable? It has nothing to do with
9.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
This is a huge problem. Javascript has become a blight on the web, and browsers really need to make it easier to manage stopping scripts on background tabs and such.
10.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
You have a magic firefox then. I try to use it that way too, but its sitting at 1.8GB of RAM and 25-30% CPU usage with 103 tabs and it routinely bombs on me after a week or two when it gets up to 2.5GB or so.
11.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
>It's less confusing when you focus on the 'freedom of the users'. No it isn't. The entire purpose of the GPL is to restrict the freedom of the users. Public domain gives freedom to the users. Everything else adds
12.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
So who are you using then? I don't see anyone that has a cap. Everyone charges you if you go over your allotted bandwidth.
13.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
It depends on the item. China is known for low quality goods because companies outsource to China to save money. They are telling the companies in China to make cheap crap. The manufacturers are perfectly capable and more than happy to m
14.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
>They're commercially available At absurd prices though. It isn't just the shipping, small scale farm/market garden stuff is priced ridiculously high.
15.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
>but in truth they deal with less knowledge than a subsistence farmer, who has to know a hell of a lot about agronomy. If they had to then they would. Since they do not, obviously they do not have to. Very few farmers of any sort know
16.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
17.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
Don't go lumping us in with the alt-right. We're not even right wing.
18.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
You just linked to a honing steel that is incorrectly labelled on amazon as a "sharpening steel" (which no, does not exist) by the random vendor who knows nothing about the products they sell. Read the actual item description fro
19.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
>You've been violating the site's guidelines by using it primarily to conduct political battles What? I read what I find interesting, and respond if I have something to say. Your assessment of my use of the site makes it very
20.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
But leave the initial off topic and inflammatory political attack there. Very unbiased non-partisan moderation.
21.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
>He's already backtracking on ObamaCare, saying he wants to keep parts of it He said that over 6 months ago, that's not backtracking. >unless you campaigned a lot to get more people to the polls in the Dem primary to vote fo
22.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
>Because if you're in USNE, you probably felt genuinely ill after hearing the nomination Which is both a foolish assumption and completely off-topic and irrelevant. Even in the NE, millions of people voted for Trump. And millions
23.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
>Uhm, well, because I'm having a conversation about cultural differences between the midwest and the north-east The subject is entirely irrelevant. You just bring it up to virtue signal, despite the fact that even in your best case
24.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
>Sorry about Trump, BTW. Why on earth do you think that sort of random political non-sequitur is appropriate?
25.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
I know it is in the guidelines. I am saying that I disagree with that guideline as it does not accomplish the goal the guidelines are intended to accomplish.
26.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
It does add to the comment. It hopefully encourages people to actually read the article. People can not contribute to a discussion constructively if they do not read the subject of the discussion.
27.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
I don't think it is either. But the post is under the misconception that twitter should be saved because it offers a free speech alternative to the other social media outlets.
28.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
Twitter is 100% opposed to free speech, and have stated policy that they censor views they do not like. There is nothing there to save for the sake of free speech. If you want some form of "social media" with free speech, you&#x
29.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
>I expected better from NPR I know this is going to sound snarky, but I really am genuinely asking: why? They have a history of very blatantly pushing their political agenda, most people seem to acknowledge that NPR is pretty left leani
30.
▲
by
MustardTiger
10y ago
Except they are more likely to give up in other fields too. Even fields with lots of women in them. So no, your assumption is not backed by basic evidence.
More ›