Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
MinusGix
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
MinusGix
1y ago
Generally because there's not that much to comment on, as this is effectively a somewhat prettier ungoogled chromium, and so there's not much room to make positive comments. Though I agree people get caught up in negativity easily
2.
▲
by
MinusGix
2y ago
It is some mix of priorities along the frontier, with Apple being on the significantly controlling end such that I wouldn't want to bother. Your trust should also be based on prediction, and giving a major company even more control ove
3.
▲
by
MinusGix
3y ago
It certainly could, and I wouldn't be surprised if the authors want to try it out on those. You do have issues of past improvements often not quite enhancing more powerful models nearly as much. I'd expect this to possibly not wor
4.
▲
by
MinusGix
4y ago
Druid works quite well, and is likely enough for many GUI projects. I'm not sure what your reasoning is that implementing it in a platform-native language will work better. Are you referring to using their platform native UI to get
5.
▲
by
MinusGix
5y ago
As others have said, people have a lot of photos. It wouldn't be too hard to hide them a bit from obvious view. As well, I rarely look at my gallery unless I need to. I just add a few photos occasionally. So maybe once every two weeks
6.
▲
by
MinusGix
5y ago
It isn't uncommon for me to find a site that uses it legitimately. Sometimes for telling the user info, sometimes for reporting an error, and sometimes for other goals. Sure, it'd be better if they did it in a more normal manner (
7.
▲
by
MinusGix
5y ago
I often do that, but it can be kinda slow (on Windows 10) so Win+R then the executable name if I know that works even quicker.
8.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
Its more referring to the concept of realizing there's a solution to the problem and being willing to take it. When I was younger, there was a notable amount of times where I felt cold but didn't bother getting a jacket. Of course
9.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
I think this is more of a matter of scale, like in your ISP and datacenter example, social media could be counted in on that too due to the sheer size of it and influence it can have on people. I agree that not having moderation isn'
10.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
I think the issue is one of scale. Having non-perfect free-speech is fine on your usual forum site, and somewhat has to be used to ensure quality. While, at the absolutely massive scale that Reddit and other social media giants are at, th
11.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
While that would benefit StackOverflow, it would cause a lot of issues when searching anything remotely obscure. I've ran into many questions that haven't seen activity since 2012 and don't have any newer ones.
12.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
I think that them being equivalently positive is a weird way of looking at it? It ignores what the poster you're replying to is probably referring towards. If you value Romanian ideals over Texan ideals then you'd prefer Romania t
13.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
Maybe could have it work on a cloned temp file, and then autosaving on losing focus. Opening the same real-file would lead to the same temp-file. Might be able to make manual :w save the temp to the real, but may be better to have it as a s
14.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
Hah, I'm the exact opposite. Greatly enjoy very colored themes, but it feels like almost all themes are about 50% white text with only a handful of things colored.
15.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
If it was having a person having to make a television show about someone they hated then I would agree, but corporations are _not_ people and so the reasoning does not apply.
16.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
Those two statements are not in conflict. Yes, we have done very well for ourselves, but that doesn't mean we aren't irrational and flawed. Just because we have done well doesn't mean we should ignore areas of improvement.
17.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
They aren't arguing that you should simply not trust the majority at all, but that you should be willing to evaluate the majority's beliefs. There are obviously limits on this, and I think you are trying for a far too absolute int
18.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
You could frame it as discovery being finding something out about the thing. So you find out the color of the trees in fall, the sun that an asteroid is about to fall into, or a person's name. For invention, you are usually deliberat
19.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
> A lot of people enjoy watching a new marvel movie once or twice a year while the movies themselves are more or less reiterations of the previous ones. People seem to enjoy the repetition. Honestly, I would argue against this. While the
20.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
There's obviously levels to it, its not "This is a fallacy/incorrect argument" and "This is a good argument". Invocation of expert is not the end of all discussion, as there are non-truthful experts and autho
21.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
I personally access 10.0.0.1 and that works at numerous places with wifi portals. Especially useful when my device/browser doesn't automatically detect that there is a captive portal.
22.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
This site is likely to get annoyed at Chrome as well. Also, just because Chrome gets away with it doesn't mean its an action that should be accepted purely for that reasoning.
23.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
In part this is arguing over a definition of nature. You're going for the obvious "We are part of nature because nature created us and we work within the system." while they're going for the idea of it being more stric
24.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
It argues against a 'straw man' that I personally have talked with people that think that nuclear war would certainly destroy all of humankind. As well, its not arguing against the nuclear war being Super-Bad, the conclusion eve
25.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
I certainly agree, and that is somewhat part of what I was saying.
26.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
We do. Even though the world has become safer and more prosperous it is still dangerous to our health and sanity. That doesn't mean we should avoid all risk. What you are more talking about is the Politicians overstate the chance of da
27.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
I think you're avoiding the alternative option, that there can be different levels of regulation based on size and power of a company. There's a rather large difference between Twitter, which has a lot of people using it every d
28.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
If there was a common cultural idea generated of "blame the person, not the place that serves the content" then that would solve that issue. Personally, I see that we're currently heading away from that, and while we've
29.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
Like a lot of issues you'll likely need to choose a Schelling point (arbitrary cutoff). Some of it is simple inconveniences. It is a lot harder to learn enough psychology, understand your audience, and so on to influence them in comp
30.
▲
by
MinusGix
6y ago
While I do agree that a citation would be useful, just because this decision alienates people doesn't make the alienated group just Republican-Trump supporters or even just Republicans. As it is more a freedom of spreading information
More ›