MindTheAbstract

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by MindTheAbstract 1y ago

   I wonder if there's some amount of on-prem going on there
2. 2.▲
   by MindTheAbstract 1y ago

   Maybe I'll get back on the subscriptions then... appreciate the perspective
3. 3.▲
   by MindTheAbstract 1y ago

   It might still be a little slow (I'm not sure if the 16 seconds to compute an action is fast enough for commercial use cases), but this is definitely exciting and seems like a great step forward.
4. 4.▲
   by MindTheAbstract 1y ago

   Like others have said, its an interesting avenue for AGI. The joint embeddings would be closer to thinking than the current LLM token work. LLMs look like they have a lot limitations for AGI (although who knows if we have another crazy scal
5. 5.▲
   by MindTheAbstract 1y ago

   I really hope it's the latter, that would be quite brilliant
6. 6.▲
   by MindTheAbstract 1y ago

   Is there a particular one you pay for pro on? Or do you pay for several models?
7. 7.▲
   by MindTheAbstract 1y ago

   For those that use LLMs, how many still use a subscription? Is it worth it? I've found a counsel of LLMs on free tier to be quite effective for my needs, but I'm curious if anyone feels strongly about needing to pay to get the adv
8. 8.▲
   by MindTheAbstract 1y ago

   Not the best few days for Apple, getting a lot of mockery b/w liquid glass and the Illusion paper
9. 9.▲
   by MindTheAbstract 1y ago

   While I tend to agree, I wonder if synthetic data might be reaching a new high with concepts like Google's AlphaEvolve. It doesn't cover everything, but at least in verifiable concepts, I could see it produce more valuable trainin
10. 10.▲
    by MindTheAbstract 1y ago

    I know this is the terminology, but I'd argue that the activations are the actual thinking. It's probably too late to change that, but I wish people would refer to thinking as the work Anthropic and Deepmind are doing with their m