Mike_12345

6 ms·

1.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
LOL you actually sound like ChatGPT. Are you a LLM?
2.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
[flagged]
3.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
Go to Google Scholar and search for "neurotoxicity of cannabis" You can find studies showing that even pure THC is neurotoxic. It depends on dosage and frequency.
4.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
> Very interesting! I'd love to learn more. Please show us the data supporting this assertion. You can't demand a study/citation for someones personal experience. That is absurd. You are being an absolutely illogical clown
5.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
Yes, price = quality because they require supercomputing resources to train. GPT-3 required hundreds of Tesla GPUs running for several weeks. That's millions of dollars just for hardware, not including power (the GPUs cost $15k each)
6.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
Ask ChatGPT
7.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
> Where is the objectivity? Objectively worse performance in life and in mentally taxing work. It really isn't that complicated. Go smoke a massive bong hit then do a calculus exam and compare your score.
8.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
> "Basic common sense" is not a synonym for "science". I explained this was my opinion based on experience multiple times so you're just arguing with a strawman. You are absolutely wasting your time here and
9.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
> No, it isn't. It's medicine, and remarkably harmless recreation. Try reading the article before commenting.
10.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
> How do you measure neurotoxicity on yourself? If you consume it, and it subjectively and objectively harms your mental health and cognitive abilities, then basic common sense and reasoning tells you it is harmful to the brain (neurotox
11.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
> That's not a settled debate; not remotely. In my opinion it is neurotoxic, based on studies I have seen (such as this one that we are commenting on) plus my own direct personal experience. Even without the psychoactive components,
12.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
Isn't that the entire point of the article and study that we are commenting on?
13.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
> I firmly believe that psychedelics are triggers and not the cause of mental disorders If a neurotoxic drug such as cannabis causes psychosis in someone who would otherwise never have become psychotic without the drug, then whether you
14.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
> if memorized every single result of of a multiplication between two numbers up to the maximum a human can possibly think of, then do I understand multiplication? No, ChatGPT is not simply regurgitating. It actually understands the data
15.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
Here's a prompt: "If there is a bob outside, and a bib inside, and the bib cannot see the bob, can the bob see the bib?" Answer: "If the bib cannot see the bob due to being inside, it is likely that the bob, which is ou
16.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
Alright so deep learning, the state of the art of AI, is a "party trick". AlphaZero is likewise a party trick. No "true" reasoning involved. > Like actual reasoning. You're relying on intuition and personal bel
17.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
> Part of my whole point is that LLMs are to NLPs as rockets are to airplanes. Yes it is deep learning applied to NLP. Makes the old designs obsolete > the data is text It is not randomly generated text. There are patterns in that tex
18.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
Here is an example of an emergent ability of ChatGPT that you can try yourself right now. Give it this prompt: "Write a short play where "Karen" (who behaves as the Karen meme) is on a romantic date with Hunter S. Thompson. T
19.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
It was a straightforward response to "I simply mean his track record of predicting the future trajectory of AI is not great."
20.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
What do you mean we don't have evidence? It has already been presented to you. You choose to reject it for reasons I truly don't understand. Search on Google Scholar if you want a more academic explanation. You can try it out on C
21.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
Well he bet on neural networks in the early days when it was unpopular, and that turned out to be the right trajectory. He received a Turing Award for his work that was foundational to the current state of the art.
22.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
Everyone knows it has limitations. You have to work within the limitations of the model. No one has claimed that GPT is AGI. Doesn't mean it's incapable of any degree of reasoning. Yes the prompt actually matters. It was trained a
23.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
Also > reasoning in a traditional sense. We are talking about reasoning in a general sense. There are many types of reasoning in AI which I'm sure you know how to look up and read about. "Traditional" is not one of the ca
24.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
(follow up to adjacent comment) So what I'm saying is, GPT "knows" what a cat is. It "knows" what an orange is. It has inferred these concepts from the data set. Imagine approaching someone who is tripping on LSD an
25.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
> But LLMs do not solve natural language understanding in any of the meanings that the phrase meant before LLMs. Are you saying that NLP as a field of research did not exist before LLMs? This is a continuation of research that has been i
26.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
His opinion obviously does matter because he is a founder of the field. No one believes that he is prescient. You are exaggerating and creating a strawman argument, infantilizing the readers here. We don't worship him or outsource our
27.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
Solving natural language understanding tasks requires reasoning, by definition. I think you are sticking to a narrow definition of reasoning that is not very technical. Formally there are many types of reasoning in AI.
28.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
> I am all about emergent properties of neural networks, but I absolutely do not believe that LLMs have them, specifically because of the way they are designed. Even when faced with evidence that contradicts your beliefs and proves that
29.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
This is going off topic, but originally I was replying to this comment: "The modern era has dramatically reduced civilian casualties compared previous generations... Precision munitions contribute heavily to this reduction.". I wa
30.
by Mike_12345 3y ago
You are so narrowly fixated on this one specific domain which is an edge case with LLMs. ChatGPT was trained specifically to solve "natural language understanding tasks". You are missing the forest for the trees and ignoring every

More ›