Marshferm

5 ms·

1.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
This is bad news as full grown ticks aren’t involved, but this is evolution after all, the function is to end CAFO related greenhouse gas in meat production but the genetic mechanism was tick human coevo through infectious pathogen. Time to
2.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
I recommend this extraordinary book, The First Domestication the coevolution of Humans and Wolves, charting the possible events. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300226164/the-first-dome...
3.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
We’re looking at an ecological model - Eocene - not seen for 45 million years in which most mammals may not survive and that includes us. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64241-0
4.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
Are you for real dude? Lkms is a typo of LLMs. Semantic is only in task demands, and they’re variable. They extend limitlessly from action or spatial syntax, they don’t exist in words or images. You’ve been sold junk tech, read any Gary Mar
5.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
You’ve just explained how neither images nor words cohere thought in LKNs Gaussian frontier or otherwise- they are wholly arbitrary. They reference nothing in and of themselves. And investors have been sold a bubble in every model so far. E
6.
The emergence and diversification of dog morphology(science.org)
35 points by Marshferm 10mo ago|32 comments
7.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
Your intellectual insecurity doesn’t mean I offer due diligence for existing information, nor does it give you any protocol to shift apologies especially since we evaluate software for special effects in high budget streaming. And none of o
8.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
Take great offense at being called a bot, especially considering any glance can spot my numerous typos. And the weakness of your search capability: that quote is from a discussion of Ev’s following the pub of this paper https://p
9.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
It’s not a keyword, it’s the seat of intelligence. What coders don’t grasp is nothing g related to symbols metaphors words language manifests as consciousness and or intel. Your field is a wash. “We refute (based on empirical evidence) clai
10.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
They have no functional or processual relationship to brains, there are scores of papers making light of this. There are no valid parallels between AI and brains. There were never approximations merely false models. The field is trapped in
11.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
These are not approximations, they are arbitrary simulations that have nothing to do with observation. They’re irrelevant in terms of any idea of intelligence as intel is built upon topologies. Intelligence is tied to development where func
12.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
Western collapse of patriarchy, annals of…
13.
Rising Cognitive Disability as a Public Health Concern Among US Adults(neurology.org)
6 points by Marshferm 10mo ago|0 comments
14.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
System 2 has been disproven at least 7 years ago.
15.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
Fundamentally incorrect across the board. we study ML for any signs of parallel function even from a tinkering level. Nope. Look at Unlocking The brain both volumes, rhythms of the brain and the brain from inside out, and these are the tip.
16.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
Neurobio is built from the base units of consciousness outwards, not intuited interpretation. Eg prediction has nothing inherent to do with consciousness directly. That’s a process imposed on brains post hoc. https://pubmed.ncbi.
17.
Genetic link to intelligence: Neurite density as a factor in ranges of intel(academic.oup.com)
3 points by Marshferm 10mo ago|0 comments
18.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
The problem is none of these approaches to intelligence are related to biointelligence. These are intuited, folk psychological/scientific, in a sense pseudoscientific graftings from machine vision principles. While there is spatial com
19.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
those two words only describe AI models, as they are models. A "world model" is worse than those two words as it is oxymoronic. The idea that words and space are being conflated as a formula for spatial intelligence is fundamental
20.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
This is arbitrary, it has nothing to do with specifics or coherence. Study it carefully particularly as it relates to general robitics.
21.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
It’s irrelevant - it has nothing analogous to mental imagery. It’s pseudoscience. Edit - of course you have no idea, you have no grasp of the oscillatory-dynamic origins of consciousness, nor does it seem anyone in AI.
22.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
If biology operated this way animals would never have evolved. This is bunk, it has nothing to do with intelligence and everything to do with hyping the oxymoronic/paradox branded as spatial intelligence. It's a flimsy way of usin
23.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
The transition from episodic thought dominance to mythological thought dominance as literary theory posing as neuroscience. For a non pseudoscientific approach, see Aurbachs Mimesis which builds the same argument without pretext. We would n
24.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
Models are trivial in bio intelligence. Spatial intelligence here is never defined, it’s only thrown against a wall with random examples of uses like storytelling (another trivial world model). Face it this is a frontier Hail Mary as the ap
25.
The Ethnic Phenomenon: groundbreaking Darwinian study of otherism & states [pdf](lesacreduprintemps19.wordpress.com)
1 points by Marshferm 10mo ago|0 comments
26.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
World models are trivial. eg narratives are world models and they provide only pre frontal simulation, ie they are synthetically prey-predation. No animal uses world models for survival and doubtful they exist (maps are not models), a worl
27.
Star Wars Visions "Black" Shinya Ohira directed animation – the best new SW [video](youtube.com)
1 points by Marshferm 10mo ago|0 comments
28.
When should we worry about AI being used to design pathogens?(rand.org)
1 points by Marshferm 10mo ago|0 comments
29.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
The real question is what types of music can AI hide inside best? See it as a pathogen.
30.
by Marshferm 10mo ago
There are no distinct advantages that confer dominance that affords such a construct as patriarchy. Hypotheticals regarding where optimums are best expressed are irrelevant in terms of a partnership future, they will be negotiated.

More ›