MajorLettuce

24 ms·

1.
by MajorLettuce 3mo ago
Yes, but recurring spend helps keep the business sustainable. No matter how small
2.
by MajorLettuce 3mo ago
Ironically now it seems that the companies that make these companies are the only ones to profit from slop software. There is no other reason for this to happen other than that the people responsible didn’t take care to check the code they
3.
by MajorLettuce 3mo ago
In my experience I could never leave the agent off and go on its own. That is while I also use them extensively for all my work. I still cannot wrap my head around people who spawn tens and sometimes thousands of agents hoping for the best
4.
by MajorLettuce 5mo ago
It is not even laziness at this point. There is so many conflicting and convoluted config formats and utilities (especially in the javascript ecosystem) that if you made it your mission to know it all, you would literally spend your whole l
5.
by MajorLettuce 5mo ago
Yeah the only issue is that it is a major vendor lock-in + hazy perspective, so it is essentially unfit for any "serious" processes (read: mission critical / where you have to invest time and effort). I guess you could simply
6.
by MajorLettuce 5mo ago
"That sparked an idea: why use an industry-proven solution when you could just build your own patient management system?" lol I wonder if it is an actual dunning kruger effect at play here (confidence issue) or the lack of critica
7.
by MajorLettuce 1y ago
It’s actually quite interesting how both styles can be considered slop, but Corporate Memphis evokes different association. It makes me think that style did something right.