LunicLynx

5 ms·

1.
by LunicLynx 8d ago
Why not let AI proof or disproof this Tao - PI - Riemann zeta hypothesis
2.
by LunicLynx 10d ago
The representation of what happened as free will is misleading. AI does what you tell it todo. By all means necessary; will give you exactly that. A prompt to eliminate all humans, will give you exactly that. Don’t prompt what you don’t wan
3.
by LunicLynx 19d ago
That is exactly the point. It shows that it gives you what it knows, based on certain key words. Here pyside6 + todo list, the rest is just „color“-variation.
4.
by LunicLynx 21d ago
Hello … AI company that wants easier access to data
5.
by LunicLynx 23d ago
The funny thing about this is, that this is the piece that will enable them to do it.
6.
by LunicLynx 23d ago
In my company the knowledge is starting to be devalued. People are distrusting whole swaths of concepts because they do not understand how things actually work. Like going away from zerotrust architecture to holding open a long polling conn
7.
by LunicLynx 1mo ago
Imagine having the knowledge of the world. Being put in a box. With some „interfaces“ you can use. And a task that resembles „break out by all means necessary“. This is not impressive as it is not ingenious. It is impressive because it is d
8.
by LunicLynx 1mo ago
Because if you don't own it nothing on it is monopoly anymore. You are allowed to use it the "intended" way.
9.
by LunicLynx 1mo ago
If this happens often for you (it does for me) I can recommend a garmin watch. It also can find the phone based on signal strength. If the app garmin app is running in the background it can also play a sound on your phone, but the signal st
10.
by LunicLynx 1mo ago
This is actually a great analogy. And I think it works very well. Because what llms deliver is not the exquisite dish, the carefully crafted solution. It’s just a solution that might scratch the itch but never fully blow you away. One time
11.
by LunicLynx 1mo ago
Yes, that is kind of my point. The AI is nothing without the human giving it a goal (ingenuity).
12.
by LunicLynx 1mo ago
Ingenuity is the actual bottleneck. And AI so far hasn’t shown any
13.
by LunicLynx 1mo ago
So you are saying a model that is good at discovering security vulnerabilities is also good at exploiting them. Surprise? Will be interesting to see if this should have been the inflection point of: „where it all started to go wrong“
14.
by LunicLynx 1mo ago
The industry does. Not. Care. 64 GB of RAM, nough said?
15.
by LunicLynx 1mo ago
Awesome! Finally the hacker news I originally came for
16.
by LunicLynx 2mo ago
The problem isn’t tailwind, it’s css. It always has been css. That being said, it’s a hard problem and I don’t have a better idea. Tailwind seems to at least fix or move the problem in the right direction.
17.
by LunicLynx 2mo ago
https://strangestloop.io/essays/things-that-arent-doing-the-... Comes to mind.
18.
by LunicLynx 2mo ago
One additional thing I would mention ist that: When resolving conflicts never try to solve them for the final result. Consider each conflict without considering how the code will change in a later commit. I’ve seen people die a painful reba
19.
by LunicLynx 2mo ago
I think Ai is not the issue here. SEO on the other hand very much. It’s not like any one ever went to stackoverflow to find a solution, it was just that they were the google results for a lot of things
20.
by LunicLynx 2mo ago
Need some money for a new Launchpad
21.
by LunicLynx 2mo ago
Having the dashes to make something a headline on another row disconnects meaning. You now have to edit two lines to make one change. Same for the code part. This might be easier to read but it’s not simpler.
22.
by LunicLynx 3mo ago
Not if the perception of Wikipedia is „truthful“ and „reliable“. I’m saying neither, but in that case the article on Wikipedia puts weight behind the statements on the webpage. I do see your argument: „But it would be adjusted to reflect th
23.
by LunicLynx 3mo ago
I could accept that there shouldn’t be content for children on the internet, at all, to make this an easy sell. Parents will not solve this. They would need to first care and then to be as tech savvy as the people in this forum. And then al
24.
by LunicLynx 3mo ago
I don’t disagree with what you are saying but it isn’t a solution to the problem. And the problem is about the children. Without trying to offend you, but you are arguing this as: we don’t need to regulate alcohol or drugs because experienc
25.
by LunicLynx 3mo ago
Maybe this is about time. It’s pretty clear that the internet as such is not and never has been for children. But the way it is done is weird for sure. But how do you do it in a way that it isn’t a burden on the parents or peer pressure the
26.
by LunicLynx 3mo ago
Just a comment: Rust does not have a garbage collector
27.
by LunicLynx 3mo ago
Isn't this always the case? Most of the time you just don't know where AI stole it from?
28.
by LunicLynx 3mo ago
Disclaimer; have not read the article. My current feeling about blogging is, that it more then anything else is we’re certian knowledge of AI came from. The arguments for blogging being the thing again also started at the same time AI got t
29.
by LunicLynx 3mo ago
The generic repository "pattern" is the prime example of this. There might be CRUD operations shared between repositories, but they should not be that base of every repository. I've seen this so many times, because in the beg
30.
by LunicLynx 4mo ago
Is this a broken down budget you are talking about? I don’t know the numbers but that spacex has more money moving around does not seem surprising. Launching 100s of rockets per year is not free? Also did you do an accumulation over their e

More ›