Lumich

5 ms·

1.
by Lumich 3d ago
What are some other noteworthy conspiracies you could cite given History's (or her makers') negligence?
2.
by Lumich 3d ago
This somewhat counter-intuitive bolshevist policy of regionalization and decentralisation starts making sense if Richard Poe is right, who says they (them being mostly Jews) were working for the British. How the British invented Communism (
3.
by Lumich 3d ago
Yes, my comment was a bit over the top. The moreless catastrophic decline of their languages was perhaps unavoidable. And I know there are always good people even when the dominant force is bad. « there are some 6 million Indigenous people
4.
by Lumich 4d ago
I'm wondering what script the North American Indians† would have replaced the one given to them by their English-speaking colonizers with had they been given any in the first place and not been all but exterminated instead. Well, anywa
5.
by Lumich 4d ago
Incredibly stupid and misleading comment of yours, slily insinuating Adrian has taken an "arrogant/racist" attitude towards the Japanese, when in fact not the slightest trace of such an attitude can be found in his comment. R
6.
by Lumich 5d ago
« the US went into Afghanistan for no reason in 2001 » — Reason was the Taliban had destroyed the poppy fields which had been providing a nice windfall for the CIA and the US economy (through money laundering, see Catherine Austin Fitts), a
7.
by Lumich 5d ago
« we don't televise their deaths » — Wikileaks did, at least tried to, but bravely filling in these gaps in the footage had regrettable consequences. Assange had to stay a couple years imprisoned in am embassy till they struck a deal.
8.
by Lumich 9d ago
« In their execution and the nature of the threat they posed to America, the 9/11 attacks appeared sudden, new—but they did not arise overnight or without warning. They happened following decades of evolving terrorist tactics […] » Whi
9.
by Lumich 9d ago
In my opinion, it's not worth while giving them the benefit of the doubt and studying their “report” (narrative). They play dumb, and “OMG, we f*cked up so badly, it's simply unbelievable!” Well, it is, verbatim. And nobody should
10.
by Lumich 9d ago
Astonishing, baffling, very weird, of course. Like so many other aspects. The cartoonish cookie cutter way they cut the holes in the towers. My first thought was, “this looks like Hollywood!” (And it was.) The pancake demolition, wtf. The S
11.
by Lumich 9d ago
It would be great to have a direct border with Russia, and finally get rid of US troops in Europe. Would solve lots of issues and drastically increase prosperity and well-being. There's never been a Russian threat in the first place. T
12.
by Lumich 10d ago
« As a European I’m » – So what country do you hail from? I understand it's not Serbia. Just so this wild nonsense and wannabe satire can have proper geographic attribution. (Because despite there being a strong indidivual factor, the
13.
by Lumich 13d ago
As it sounds like you have some knowledge about these engines, from the article: “These [combustion] gases spin the [turbine] disk, which is attached by a drive arm to its associated drive shaft. The shaft then transfers the turbine’s rota
14.
by Lumich 24d ago
« no sanctions against the US for its obviously reckless interference in other countries » – Definitely not enough, not even remotely. But there have been sanctions (though not labeled such) against the US under the guise of grounding the B
15.
by Lumich 25d ago
The EU does not serve Europe but US interests, origins go back to the “American Committee on United Europe”, where only one or two Europeans were represented (who were already aligned with “globalism”). You might already know this, but as f
16.
by Lumich 25d ago
Yes, the increased effectiveness of cheap weapons is positive for the global underdogs. And the enormous military network the US entertains is costly. Which is why they have vassals (to foot the bills, at least in part). We'll see how
17.
by Lumich 26d ago
« they're definitely afraid of other people's nukes » – They know 100 % no nukes work at all and never have anywhere. « USA is afraid of other people's nukes » – And of extraterrestrians, too. It's all just propaganda pl
18.
by Lumich 26d ago
« national self-interests … are widely reported » – What's “widely reported” by the propaganda apparatus is often at odds with “national interest”, which is at least something that makes sense, whereas “the self-interest of Europe” is
19.
by Lumich 26d ago
« Imagine if the British had responded this way to the invasion of Poland in WW2. » – What exactly was the British “response” when the Soviet Union invaded “Eastern Poland” on Sep 17, 1939? And what was their “response” when confronted with
20.
by Lumich 26d ago
« Germany had already brought an end to it » – Wrong. And of course refusal to start pipeline operation and the ridiculous legal shenanigans (at EU level) were down to US pressure. « It was, and is, in the self-interest of Europe » – Where
21.
by Lumich 26d ago
« Russia can retreat into their internationally recognized borders at any time. » The US has around 900 military bases abroad. Far more than all other countries combined. These bases are a constant source of threats and bullying, deploying
22.
by Lumich 26d ago
« Ukrainians have the right to decide » – Well, they did decide, but the U.S. didn't appreciate, so overthrew their government back in 2014, remember? “The most blatant coup in history”, see Nuland/Pyatt intercept. Instead, the U.
23.
by Lumich 26d ago
« getting nuked » – If that were a real possibility it would have happened in March '22 when the (not very sharp) Russian leadership understood they'd entered a bear trap and couldn't see a way to get out. This idea has alway
24.
by Lumich 1mo ago
« the point is not clear » – Yes it is. And it was, and had been before. I understand exactly what you're saying. I simply don't agree to such mechanistic, rigid “rules” for conversation.
25.
by Lumich 1mo ago
Thanks for that YPM sketch. Incidentally, I think the “nuclear deterrant” story is total bogus from the get-go. But has worked great for decades as a framework to frighten people, or at least provide justifications and impose “global order”
26.
by Lumich 1mo ago
« right in the face » — It's mainly Germany that's hit right in the face and where the Stockholm syndrome applies most closely. If we look at our dear neighbours, then we can see that some of them stand to profit from the Nord Str
27.
by Lumich 1mo ago
« When people mention 'third world', they are assumed to mean Sauvy's frame » Well, that's what you're assuming. I had never heard of Sauvy and was totally unaware of his definition that had lost all meaning by the
28.
by Lumich 1mo ago
Spot on. Also, in 2003, the war on Iraq, still occupied. And the proxy war on Syria (stifling an unwelcome pipeline project). European “leaders” pretend to not comprehend how they're being screwed. Stockholm syndrome. Populations don&#
29.
by Lumich 1mo ago
« You cannot attribute to the speaker unproven intentions … explicitly forbidden » As I said, I didn't intend to diss either Sauvy or you, first time I heard about this guy, and also asked some French contacts about whether he's s
30.
by Lumich 1mo ago
« Why … omitting » – There was no ill intent. I saw you provided a third explanation for the term, but didn't want to analyze any deeper, so I focused on the part where Sauvy fit the notion I grew up with, the only one I was familiar w

More ›