Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
LrnByTeach
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
2y ago
to me, just that these lines from DeepSeek founder/CEO Liang Wenfeng gives a clue that China communist party involvement in DeepSeek-R1 is minimal or nothing. If CCP is involved in a big way, we won't see these words from CEO. &g
2.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
2y ago
Such a relief/contrast to the period between 2010 and 2020, when the top five Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, and Microsoft monopolized their own regions and refused to compete with any other player in new fields. Google : Search Face
3.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
2y ago
yes, staggered software update is the way to go. there was reply in this thread why Crowdstrike did not do it -- don't want extra cost of Engineering for that having 1/3 of Airlines computers Windows, RHEL, Ubuntu .. all unlikely
4.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
2y ago
what many people of not taking is that why we are here: one simple reason: all eggs in one Microsoft PC basket why in one Microsoft PC basket? - most corporate desktop apps are developed for Windows ONLY Why most corporate desktop apps are
5.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
2y ago
Wow !! good to know real reason for non-staggered release of the software ... > Crowdstrike bit my company with a false positive that severely broke the entire production fleet because they pushed the change everywhere all at once inste
6.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
2y ago
my own analysis
7.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
2y ago
Losers & Winners from Llama-3-400B Matching 'Claude 3 Opus' etc.. Losers: - Nvidia Stock : lid on GPU growth in the coming year or two as "Nation states" use Llama-3/Llama-4 instead spending $$$ on GPU for own m
8.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
3y ago
This might have been a reasonable and workable solution for all parties involved. Context: --------- 1.1/ ILya Sukhar and Board do not agree with Sam Altman vision of a) too fast commercialization of Open AI AND/OR b) too fast pro
9.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
3y ago
This may be a fair workable solution to all the parties involved. Context: --------- 1.1/ ILya Sukhar and Board do not agree with Sam Altman vision of a) too fast commercialization of Open AI AND/OR b) too fast progression to GPT
10.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
3y ago
To account for the changing times, I believe a Personal LLM should be running on your phone (with a cloud data backup) with background AGENTS looking for shopping deals, working with your calendar and making appointments for all life chores
11.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
3y ago
good to know what these "Company OS" stands for > Salesforce comes in at the sales side of things, > SAP invades as a finance app, and > ServiceNow begins their encroachment as an IT ticketing system, but they all wanna b
12.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
3y ago
In my opinion LLM based document search tools such as OSS Quivr may be better suited for documentation search for startups. A highly customed Quivr with one of the 'Open Source LLMs' may provides great 'semantic search'
13.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
3y ago
> This is at least the biggest release since 1.18 with generics, possibly bigger. > the changes demonstrate a transition from the traditional go philosophy of almost fanatical minimalism, to a more utilitarian approach. This change de
14.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
3y ago
I think the following service may match what you are asking for , it is priced at $500 and from a reputable company. https://www.angellist.com/incorporation Included with Incorporation Entity formation in Delaware State fil
15.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
3y ago
This Falcon-40B royalty free license may force Meta ... that LLama-7B/13B may soon be fully open sourced as Meta wants open source LLM advancements and contributions on its own LLM architecture.
16.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
3y ago
Interesting parallels , there is good possibility for this outcome with respect to Open Source LLMs > I can however see a possible future where open source is not going to have any significant impact on LLMs, say like Desktop Linux. >
17.
▲
For coding answers, Google search may be doomed even without ChatGPT/GPT-4
1 points
by
LrnByTeach
3y ago
|
1 comments
18.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
3y ago
This is the reality .. > When in human history have we ever intentionally not furthered technological progress? It's simply an unrealistic proposition ..
19.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
4y ago
I suspect GPT5 most likely will have these capabilities that is to hook into external tools such as calculators and other software applications as needed based on the prompts.
20.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
4y ago
> There’s a specific feeling of knowing that an answer to your question is very simple and exists somewhere on SO, but the mental effort of sifting pages of answers seems unappealing. It seems like Phind is well suited to do this job for
21.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
4y ago
> If I were teaching someone Python, or pretty much any programming language, the first place I would start is the debugger. Totally agree. In the first week of programming, students should be allowed only use the debugger (no direct run
22.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
4y ago
This is playbook taken from Amazon prime. This massive price cut, I believe, is intended to undercut competing open source ChatGPT equivalent initiatives. OpenAI/Micorsoft may be losing money with this new pricing, but that is on purpo
23.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
4y ago
Microsoft 2005 : computer viruses causing PCs run slow, let us not worry , users need to buy new PC in two years. Everybody in the room nodded along Google 2012: let's make Ads almost look like organic search results, everybody in the
24.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
4y ago
Thanks for that correction. my bad ,I would have googled and checked it. yes, it seems this is named related to Bard like the D&D class
25.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
4y ago
my bad ,I would have googled and checked it. yes, it seems this is named related to Bard like the D&D class
26.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
4y ago
Why Google named ChatGPT competitor as “Apprentice Bard”? Here's my take. "Apprentice is Barred from this AI race" is the phrase. "You (OpenAI) Apprentice are Barred from this AI race, because, well you are just an appre
27.
▲
Why Google named ChatGPT competitor as “Apprentice Bard”?
1 points
by
LrnByTeach
4y ago
|
1 comments
28.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
4y ago
> yes we have other tools which are effective, but in a very limited domain we have other tools which are effective, but need a very choreographed detailed INPUT. >ChatGPT is incredibly useful in a way that no other tool has ever been
29.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
4y ago
Thanks for the Wikipedia analogy, given another five years of time for refinement, ChaGPT will be viewed/used similar to Wikipedia. it "could be wrong" has had next to no bearing on its social utility . > Can you really tr
30.
▲
by
LrnByTeach
4y ago
I gave my ABOVE answer text to ChatGPT and asked to refine my idea, this is what it produced. ------- There are two distinct groups of opinions regarding the usefulness of ChatGPT: supporters and detractors. These differing perspectives ste
More ›