Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
LordLestat
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
LordLestat
7y ago
Just saying the following... Only someone who is either in support for Mozilla's constant moves AGAINST power-users and in benefit ONLY for Chrome/simple-users and diversity/intelligent-features-hating-leftists - or falling f
2.
▲
by
LordLestat
7y ago
Using Firefox from that sell-out developer with zero respect for power- and geek users.. from the developer who rather wants to attract Chrome/simple users and not supporting their own target user-base.. Mozilla is morally wise a total
3.
▲
by
LordLestat
7y ago
I rather would use Pale Moon before i would touch Mozilla Firefox - Mozilla which killed almost all customization options just to be able to be as attractive to Chrome users as possible. In fact, i also would use Vivaldi every day over Fire
4.
▲
by
LordLestat
7y ago
Also, still accepting Google money and surviving with it... I just can call this the most big hypocrisy possible!
5.
▲
by
LordLestat
7y ago
Don't get me wrong, Google tricked them. But if Mozilla would have been more intelligent... they never would have allowed a third-party having such a big impact on their own influences and decisions. Mozilla had and still has the chanc
6.
▲
by
LordLestat
7y ago
And here does Mozilla what they can do best… blaming others for their own naivety – Have they really been thinking that Google is the friendly benefactor they acted towards Mozilla? And that removing features and choice and adopting stock f
7.
▲
by
LordLestat
8y ago
In that you are right. Moonchild, Tobin and the other ones may be able to solve browser internal issues, but everything which is reaching a certain size is "patches welcome". And to make it worse, they are rather rude against Seam
8.
▲
by
LordLestat
8y ago
Right now, yes. Once even TLS1.2 becomes deprecated, it is time to switch if it would be clear that an upgrade would be impossible from the makers side of affairs. Or the moment you have to learn from the makers that they simply can't
9.
▲
by
LordLestat
8y ago
My personal reason not to use Pale Moon - and instead Otter-Browser. I also would recommend Vivaldi more than Pale Moon. If you are creating a browser it is pure illusion to think you can also handle engine stuff. That is such a complex mat
10.
▲
Possible QT WebKit revival could be great news
4 points
by
LordLestat
10y ago
|
2 comments
11.
▲
by
LordLestat
10y ago
The web i want is a a web where Mozilla sees no reason to compete with Chrome, the web i want is where Mozilla still have faith in built inside customization and choice and options instead of design and simplicity and minimalism. The web i
12.
▲
by
LordLestat
10y ago
So comments from people who think that Firefox has to feature again customization are getting downvoted. Why people value simplicity and minimalism and design more higher today than having customization features and options?
13.
▲
by
LordLestat
10y ago
And Firefox is becoming more and more a Chrome imitation browser, because Mozilla thinks only following very close the Google Chrome train will bring them back all the users who they have lost towards Chrome. And for all this they abandon p