LightHugger

6 ms·

1.
by LightHugger 4mo ago
He was dragged for persistently lying about it, doing everything in his power to shut down discussion of it, and being absurdly hostile on a personal level to the founder of the initiative unprovoked. Not for being against it.
2.
by LightHugger 4mo ago
what's the risk? "Oh no we might have to provide the product we sold!" Lmao. That's the right kind of risk to force on sellers in a market. Sellers risk getting penalized for not providing what they have paid for. Great.
3.
by LightHugger 4mo ago
Ross has had a consistent vision for years and i'm not sure where this delusion otherwise is coming from. At this point i'm wondering if people like you are just astroturf bots funded by the ESA.
4.
by LightHugger 4mo ago
There is no reason to reply like this unless you are some kind of scammer with no ethics. I hope this bill bankrupts your business model.
5.
by LightHugger 4mo ago
the idea of a "shutdown bill" is absurd and irrelevant to the law being discussed unless you are a scammer being forced to refund people.
6.
by LightHugger 4mo ago
this is absurd and untrue. this is like being told you have to pour a concrete pillar 2 meters to the left of where you were planning so that you're not destroying some vital infrastructure, then bemoaning the loss of the concrete pill
7.
by LightHugger 8mo ago
> I'm surprised AdaFruit did something wrong here. They frequently blog about their stances on issues and seem to try to take the moral high ground on a lot of issues. This aspect is not very surprising, it is usually moral high g
8.
by LightHugger 8mo ago
The car wasn't moving until they surrounded her car, that was the issue. She was blocking off traffic deliberately. She had to be arrested but tried to violently escape and was killed as a result of her actions. Please try to be more a
9.
by LightHugger 8mo ago
The bodycam has been released, he was clearly hit by the car. The police had the car surrounded and were trying to make an arrest. She decided to escape through his body. https://x.com/nicksortor/status/20096835752
10.
by LightHugger 8mo ago
Funnily enough I am a leftist, there are still some of us who aren't crazy or willing to lie for political ends :)
11.
by LightHugger 8mo ago
I just saw this as well. Here it is showing the car ramming the police officer, fortunately he was not injured. https://x.com/InsiderWire/status/2008974675171504504
12.
by LightHugger 8mo ago
She tried to run down the officer that was in front of the vehicle, not the one to the side that was holding the door handle. Turns out the bullet hole on the glass is on the front of the windshield, it's not possible if she wasn'
13.
by LightHugger 1y ago
It's worth keeping in mind that the "market" for a particular player can actually be incredibly small depending on their interests. In the most extreme example, a player might be a fan specifically of a single IP or series of
14.
by LightHugger 1y ago
Oh so releasing the game client is easy but releasing the game server is a legal/IP problem suddenly? I think you are concern trolling.
15.
by LightHugger 1y ago
the racist DEI loving IBM/red hat employees and leadership did it to themselves https://x.com/America1stLegal/status/1937994904132551029 I hope every last one of these people responsible lose their jobs.
16.
by LightHugger 1y ago
That specific set of policies is being specifically implemented by IBM/Red hat. It's not exactly a small niche company, and it is very obviously directly related to the situation and the need to fork. It's also not a partisan
17.
by LightHugger 1y ago
DEI doesn't just "piss some people off", it's outright illegal discrimination and red hat's concequences are currently working their way through the court systems. This strange equivocation from things that are clea
18.
by LightHugger 1y ago
> The "no DEI" bit is a common "slogan" from people who by many are seen to want to ignore discrimination and pretend it isn't a problem, often because they are seen as quite happy for discrimination to continue.
19.
by LightHugger 1y ago
"repeat words back to people" isn't the problem here though anyways, it's dishonest to pretend that's what matters here. not the mass bans, censorship, one sided articles, misinformational misinterpretations, zero a
20.
by LightHugger 1y ago
the xlibre guy said "no dei" in a fork that is separating from a company embroiled in racist discrimination lawsuits for using DEI to hurt real people. Is that really involving politics? In a way it is, sure, but again, unlike r
21.
by LightHugger 1y ago
It absolutely is character assassination in the context of what's been happening. News sites that have praised the xlibre author for countless articles are suddenly doing a 180 because the people who pay their bills are the same people
22.
by LightHugger 1y ago
This didn't happen because redhat/ibm/microsoft took control of the project and decided they wanted to kill it. They have said this directly on social media that this is their explicit goal so it's not as if this is a co
23.
by LightHugger 1y ago
I directly mentioned DEI, obviously i didn't leave it out. If you support red hat's DEI program then you are defending systematic discrimination on the basis of race and other immutable characteristics. This is an ultimately indef
24.
by LightHugger 1y ago
He stated everyone was welcome regardless of their race or politics. This is only a strongly political stance if you contrast it with Red Hat, whose extremist, racist and illegal discriminatory policies they implemented under the banner of
25.
by LightHugger 1y ago
This is false, he we the sole person submitting large amounts of code for about a year and was widely praised, until he forked and red hat went nuclear on his account for opposing their corporate goals, he was not kicked out for bad changes
26.
by LightHugger 1y ago
This is pretty stupid, especially this will affect the smarter people who don't even make social media profiles to begin with! They'll get accused of lying for not having one, but they're really just smart enough to stay off
27.
by LightHugger 1y ago
Uh, he has a detailed historical view of the forces that caused WW2 and argued that the rest of world powers at the time put germany in a position that was very likely to cause the second world war. woOoOo scary, the only allowed thought pa
28.
by LightHugger 1y ago
Uh, proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKsesO3bdv4 So like, no? are you a denuvo associate? Or what's the story here, what are your credentials?
29.
by LightHugger 1y ago
Not only has not not been debunked, it's been proven to be true. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKsesO3bdv4 I don't understand why there are people always defending denuvo every time it comes up. Are you associat
30.
by LightHugger 1y ago
I don't think is exaggerated by gamers, if anything it's widely understated. The issue is that denuvo affects the 1% lows and latency much more than the average FPS. But the 1% lows and latency have an outsized effect on player ex

More ›