Leparamour

5 ms·

1.
by Leparamour 5y ago
Seems like the vaccine is the deadly roulette ticket: risk of fatal bloodclotting every time a new vaccine is administered while ironically being at a higher risk against new, potentially more dangerous, mutations compared to people who rec
2.
by Leparamour 5y ago
>Read: fact-leaning bias That is if you redefine what the words 'fact' or 'fact-checking' mean in the style of Orwellian newspeak.
3.
by Leparamour 5y ago
>Jared Harris Didn't watch Foundation yet, but loved him in The Expanse, such a charismatic presence.
4.
by Leparamour 5y ago
>Okay, sure, but this would be quite the feat of medical engineering to hack the immune system to the point where it no longer operates as normal Is it? We had immunosuppressors for decades, we know about about AIDS and gene therapy. Doe
5.
by Leparamour 5y ago
> a peer reviewed study in a well known scientific journal. Isn't that a bit naive? Hypothetically, if the conspiracy theories were true, why would an established publisher take the risk to go against a genocidal cabal? It's in
6.
by Leparamour 5y ago
> You have a very high opinion of Governments in order to perpetuate a conspiracy on that scale. That's exactly what a government shill would say. /s But seriously, I never found Hanlon's razor particularly convincing. The
7.
by Leparamour 5y ago
How dare these individuals subvert well-meant racism? /s
8.
by Leparamour 5y ago
Thankfully, the article reminded me of the fact that I wanted to enroll for the CS50 today. Still I couldn't reproduce how to leverage that enrollment into an .edu mail address like the article purports. Any pointers? :D
9.
by Leparamour 5y ago
The vagueness is intentional and it's surely supposed to strengthen their ownership claim on the idea of the "metaverse"[0]. But unless the company radically changes their internal KPIs, it's probably just a matter of ti
10.
by Leparamour 5y ago
Apart from Craig White, everyone smart who was involved with the creation of Bitcoin and it's underlying technologies probably isn't oblivious to the danger of revealing themselves as Satoshi Nakamoto. Anyone and their family woul
11.
by Leparamour 5y ago
>I'd personally call it a riot. In contrast to the 'mostly peaceful' BLM protests leading up the elections of 2020?
12.
by Leparamour 5y ago
Also not without instrumentalizing Sicknick's death to further the 'orange man bad' narrative. "Neutral" NPR reporting on this: https://www.npr.org/2021/02/02/963336791/brian-sick
13.
by Leparamour 5y ago
Is this a case of Gell-Mann amnesia in where the commenters usually lament how the US judicial system is fucked up in overcharging to force a plea deal but in this case the litany of charges is convenient proof of the extreme dangerousness
14.
by Leparamour 5y ago
Do you expect people to sign up for a product that doesn't even exist yet and likely never will? Perhaps these threads will contain some useful info for you: (The Mom Test) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28667439
15.
by Leparamour 5y ago
So much scripted drama while everybody involved is on the same page and wants and regulation and more censorship of FB: Facebook wants regulation for itself to kick the ladder down for future competitors, the current "whistleblowers&qu
16.
by Leparamour 5y ago
>Except that the consensus on the science has been growing, in defiance of the consensus of politics and the public, which has been slow to get on board. The consensus on man-made climate change has grown following the rise of aggressive
17.
by Leparamour 5y ago
What were your painpoints? Did it at least work for a while? I remember using it for a few months and then being unable to to keep up with my fellow clan mates. I wondered if everybody else was playing with on cheat mode because I was total
18.
by Leparamour 5y ago
I'm using a Xiaomi Mi Band fitness tracker along with the app Gadgetbridge (to replace the official Xiaomi app and stop exfil to Chinese servers) and another app called Snoreclock which measures sleep quality. It's not the fancies
19.
by Leparamour 5y ago
>The suggestions are not relevant to "Relevant" is a code word for "we spy on your every move and also share your personal browsing behaviour with our many external partners to serve you relevant ads".
20.
by Leparamour 5y ago
>What’s wrong with paying market rates for a CEO? More expensive doesn't mean better, it most likely just means putting someone in charge whose primary metric is short-term profit.
21.
by Leparamour 5y ago
>Pretty cynical to believe she has a hidden agenda. She openly calls for more censorship, at least that agenda isn't even hidden.
22.
by Leparamour 5y ago
When was the last time that a 'whistleblower' was interviewed on prime time TV?
23.
by Leparamour 5y ago
Facebook doesn't just exclusively employ engineers, they also employ psychologists and neuroscientists exactly in order to refine these parameters and increase engagement. It's not an honest mistake, the way loot boxes, gacha mech
24.
by Leparamour 5y ago
Book deal and Oprah interview likely coming soon.
25.
by Leparamour 5y ago
Not necessarily. What you're thinking of is probably anarchism. Leftists can favour authoritarianism just as much as right-wing types. The difference is usually just between MY "good" authoritarianism vs. YOUR "bad"
26.
by Leparamour 5y ago
Check out this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27903630 It's impressive what some people can achieve under restraints. Following the recommendation I started to use Pydroid (on Adroid) from the Playstore a
27.
by Leparamour 5y ago
Finally work can be done!
28.
by Leparamour 5y ago
Unless his newly found fame attracts another group of more physical extraction "artists".
29.
by Leparamour 5y ago
So more along the lines of embezzlement?
30.
by Leparamour 5y ago
>It was initially fueled by the ennui of two world wars, and then drifted into cries about consumerism. And also bankrolled by the CIA as a psy-op tool during the Cold war. https://news.artnet.com/art-world/artcuriou

More ›