Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
LearnAndBurn
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
LearnAndBurn
13y ago
Oh my, please take all of my upvotes.
2.
▲
by
LearnAndBurn
13y ago
Unfortunately some of us are in other cities. :(
3.
▲
by
LearnAndBurn
13y ago
I figured keming was a joke about kerning. Never heard it before, so thanks! Posting to save other people time: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Keming&defid=...
4.
▲
by
LearnAndBurn
13y ago
> Why do you care about those people? Powerful words. I disagree with the parent comment even though I share a lot of the same thoughts, feelings and desires. Vengeance would surely be great, for a moment. But your words say it well. Who
5.
▲
by
LearnAndBurn
13y ago
Why not use something like http://grasshopper.com/ ?
6.
▲
by
LearnAndBurn
13y ago
This may be a bit too anecdotal, but I didn't hear about this campaign until a week before it happened. In my opinion, the organizers failed to consider awareness propagation time and as a result TDWFB felt rushed, sloppy, and silly. A
7.
▲
by
LearnAndBurn
13y ago
Must be nice. ;) But on a serious note, I wonder how much that 2009-2012 bump has to do with inflation or a lack of other opportunities in the market. Maybe I am out of touch, but it seems like there are less and less places to put your mon
8.
▲
by
LearnAndBurn
13y ago
Prior to using Snapchat, I truly wondered what the big deal was. Why is the valuation so high, and what value proposition does it offer? I'm certainly not an expert in the matter, but perhaps my observations can relay some insight to o
9.
▲
by
LearnAndBurn
13y ago
Again, I didn't intend to setup this argument. However, all one needs to show is that a "Have" is materially worse off thanks to taxes. This gets easier or harder depending on definitions. Clearly, Have versus HaveNot is not
10.
▲
by
LearnAndBurn
13y ago
Sorry, removed that piece from the original post as I feared it would detract from the main point. The use of "haves" versus "have nots" was intended as an example of divide and conquer. It was not intended as two distin
11.
▲
by
LearnAndBurn
13y ago
This and yesterday's thread [1] are fascinating. Here we have lower-classes seeking direct retribution against higher-classes. Contrast to yesterday's article involving upper-classes discussing how to uplift lower-classes via soci
12.
▲
by
LearnAndBurn
13y ago
I appreciated your comment. It's easy to overlook definitions and categorically group things based on simple criteria checking. People who are currently buying BTC is a shared characteristic of (1) speculators, (2) early adopters, and
13.
▲
Ask HN: How would you train a competent student in your field of expertise?
2 points
by
LearnAndBurn
13y ago
|
1 comments