Kbelicius

6 ms·

1.
by Kbelicius 2mo ago
It is natural to not see something that isn't there. The article isn' comapraing the two in application or functio
2.
by Kbelicius 2mo ago
> I think that's a thinly veiled excuse for a much more mundane reason this is happening; their government stakeholders asked them to find a way to retaliate as part of the arguments around trade going on, and Airbus figured this ou
3.
by Kbelicius 2mo ago
> it's only a problem if you're not willing to go and strike up conversations with people. It is not a problem if there are other people willing to also go and strike up conversations with people. That is why GP wrote that it i
4.
by Kbelicius 3mo ago
> No, they're OK with Google apparently not changing much of anything and being allowed to continue operating so long as they pay the fine first. But google did change how they do things thanks to this case thus making everything yo
5.
by Kbelicius 3mo ago
Why can't it be both? After all GP did not give any definitions. He simply and clearly stated: > The end goal shouldn't be "monopolies, but European", the end goal should be no monopolies.
6.
by Kbelicius 3mo ago
Ha, you just reminded me of something that I read a long time ago. Some history book which relayed a story from some part of islamic world from centuries ago. A king goes hunting but fails to catch anything. Hungry, he goes to a nearby vill
7.
by Kbelicius 3mo ago
> -> More people have died in the EU from heat waves due to lack of air conditioning than gun violence in the US. Ratio is worse if you remove suicide gun death. That is mostly on how heat deaths are counted in eu vs usa. In usa hea
8.
by Kbelicius 4mo ago
Downvoters aren't being silly, it's about you not considering the context of the discussion when writing your first reply. Deepseek wasn't mentioned once in this thread before your second post and AI was mentioned once in a l
9.
by Kbelicius 4mo ago
Never heard of Gazzaniga before reading above comment, its quite fascinating. The brain, its left hemisphere, makes up the narrative.
10.
by Kbelicius 5mo ago
Go look directly at the sun without any protection or go listen to sounds of 120dB if you want to test your hypothesis that light and sound can't be unhealthy. Or maybe you aren't being litteral and are just saying that what child
11.
by Kbelicius 5mo ago
Not all schools have those and not everybody can practice those at home while every school can teach cursive and every student can practice it at home. It is simple as that.
12.
by Kbelicius 5mo ago
Ok, so i guess that personal caes don't play any huge role in modern civilization and its logstics so i was right to be shocked by your statement.
13.
by Kbelicius 5mo ago
As do I. What is your point?
14.
by Kbelicius 5mo ago
Nobody said that that individualism is toxic
15.
by Kbelicius 5mo ago
> THIS! I am shocked that some people don't realize that modern civilization and our modern quality of life depends on cars to a huge degree, even for people don't personally drive. Such a lack of knowledge about modern industr
16.
by Kbelicius 5mo ago
> Who controls an automated system and whether enough automated systems exists to fulfill everyone's needs are separate things. Again, nobody said that they were. You are arguing with yourself. > You could have one person providi
17.
by Kbelicius 5mo ago
> These can't be simultaneously true. Nobody said that they can. >The techno utopia we imagine is a world where nobody has to work. All our needs are taken care of and we live a life of leisure. All our needs are taken care of in
18.
by Kbelicius 7mo ago
> Can you name me another time when humanity has run out of useful work to do? > > Was it when we tamed fire, invented the wheel, writing, or double entry bookkeeping? All of which appear more consequential than current AI. > &g
19.
by Kbelicius 7mo ago
> You'd have to be crazy to go into radiology People were saying that a decade ago, if not more, with machine learning outperforming radiologists. Today we don't have enough radiologists. What has changed since those days that
20.
by Kbelicius 7mo ago
Nobody is saying that you aren't paying more for electricity. What they are saying is that you reasoning about why that is is wrong.
21.
by Kbelicius 7mo ago
> All things unquestionably better than the past. What's there to complain about? Taste and nutritional value a worse then in the past. Arguably the two most important things when it comes to food.
22.
by Kbelicius 8mo ago
> I do not choose books over podcasts out of ignorance. I cannot read minds so I have to go with what you wrote. What you wrote in the post that I replied to is that the reason why you don't listen to podcasts is ignorance. You gave
23.
by Kbelicius 8mo ago
> This statement feels like a farmer making a case for using their hands to tend the land instead of a tractor because it produces too many crops. Modern farming requires you to have an ecosystem of supporting tools to handle the scale a
24.
by Kbelicius 8mo ago
> Listening to influencers and celebrities hang out, pretend to be friends and try to be funny just doesn't do it for me. So basically you don't subscribe to any podcasts out of ignorance. Influencers and celebrities hanging o
25.
by Kbelicius 8mo ago
You are just denying people their freedom of association. I personally wouldn't want to associate with a racist for the simple fact that he is a racist, no matter where they display their racism.
26.
by Kbelicius 9mo ago
> The UK arrests 12k people per year for social media posts, using vague laws to undermine free speech. This doesn't mean anything in isolation. > Here's the citation from the EU parliament itself [1], since I doubt you&#x27
27.
by Kbelicius 9mo ago
> I don't understand why you got heavily downvoted. Because his post contributes nothing to the discussion. > Yes, there are governments that are worse than European, but the decline of European government is the fastest. What ma
28.
by Kbelicius 9mo ago
Clicked the link but ctrl+f doesn't find any posts by you. > The point of trustless architectures (of which blockchain and smart contracts are one) is that you are eliminating implicit trust. That is also the point of laws and contr
29.
by Kbelicius 9mo ago
Bitcoin was envisioned by its creator to be used as a currency. To buy and sell stuff using it. If you ask today what is bitcoin you'll be told that it is a store of value. The purpose of money is not to be a store of value. It can be,
30.
by Kbelicius 9mo ago
So blockchain requires trust in third parties. What is the point of it then?

More ›