KalMann

6 ms·

1.
by KalMann 4mo ago
This interview lasted over an hour. If he was answering wrong they should have said something.
2.
by KalMann 4mo ago
I think this is disingenuous comparison. When we read a book we can estimate the amount of data we're taking in based on the character count (each character being represented by some fixed amount of bits). What you're suggesting o
3.
by KalMann 4mo ago
I really don't think your argument is very convincing. Some of your examples are downright ridiculous? "Jobs" Making a movie about one of the creation of some of one of the most famous companies on Earth is obviously interest
4.
by KalMann 4mo ago
I think there's been natural but steady progress with since 2024 with the release of the o1 model, which showed impressive reasoning capabilities. But I think it's wrong to look at the magnitude of the accomplishments and assume t
5.
by KalMann 4mo ago
Maybe you need to phrase it better. Like with a more specific direction of thinking.
6.
by KalMann 4mo ago
I think he's talking about reasoning models.
7.
by KalMann 4mo ago
I think your analogy is good but I don't believe modern LLMs use Lean or any lean-like structure in their proofs. At least recent open source ones like DeepSeek can do advanced math without it (maybe the most cutting edge ones are doin
8.
by KalMann 4mo ago
Not a physicist either but my understanding is that is that if you believe that we can discover all the laws of physics that explain how the world operates then it needs to have a solution. Like we have formulas describing how gravity works
9.
by KalMann 4mo ago
Are you sure? I think "normies" would prefer to see and try on the clothes they buy.
10.
by KalMann 4mo ago
I can give you the exact mathematical formula used to statistically optimize the output of a neural network from input examples. Can you do the same for the brain?
11.
by KalMann 4mo ago
> But we are? That's our education system. That is not what the education system does. That's an obvious distortion of reality. People train over billions of documents to statistically predict the next word to gain and understa
12.
by KalMann 4mo ago
> So are humans. AI advocates are _way_ too confident about the nature human cognition. Questions that have been debated by philosophers and cognitive scientists for decades are now "obvious" according to you people, though you
13.
by KalMann 4mo ago
Did you misstate your comment? The Jordan normal form is more general than spectral decomposition so it should come after.
14.
by KalMann 5mo ago
I don't really see how this implies the above commenter's statement is "simply not true".
15.
by KalMann 9mo ago
I think this was a failure. The gold standard should be that the if every human driver was replaced with an AI how well could the system function. This makes it look like things would be catastrophic. Thus, showing how humans continue to be
16.
by KalMann 9mo ago
This but with hate.
17.
by KalMann 9mo ago
Why are you phrasing your correction in the form of a question? I think it's pretty reasonable to infer that he mistakenly thought it was a Stanford study because the link was from Stanford.
18.
by KalMann 9mo ago
> Further, an ad hominem is when a person attacks someone's character without any base. That is not what an ad hominem is.
19.
by KalMann 9mo ago
> It does exactly the same, predicts tokens, That is an absolutely wild claim you've made. You're being way to presumptious.
20.
by KalMann 9mo ago
> Models don't have access to "reality" This is an explanation of why models "hallucinate" not a criticism for the provided definition of hallucination.
21.
by KalMann 10mo ago
I think the problem with your post is that it started a list of "incorrect statements" with a statement that wasn't incorrect.
22.
by KalMann 10mo ago
You're missing the point. Those kind of narrow AI applications are not the motivation for the trillions of dollars being poured into AI. Of course AI has a variety of applications many disciplines, as it has for decades. The motivatio
23.
by KalMann 10mo ago
Aren't you forgetting about the software that makes it so easy and straightforward for newcomers to flash programs and experiment the microcontroller?
24.
by KalMann 10mo ago
I'd try a some more if I were you. I saw an example of generated infographic that was greatly improved over anything I've seen an image generator do before. What you desire seems in the realm of possibility.
25.
by KalMann 10mo ago
He probably meant to say "vector" the second time he said "matrix".
26.
by KalMann 10mo ago
Expecting every little fact to have an "authoritative source" is just annoying faux intellectualism. You can ask someone why they believe something and listen to their reasoning, decide for yourself if you find it convincing, with
27.
by KalMann 10mo ago
I think his point is it means a lot in the context of investors seeking to make returns on their investments.
28.
by KalMann 10mo ago
This seems like a strange comment to make since the above comment in no way suggests that we are currently in an AI winter.
29.
by KalMann 10mo ago
Well I think you have to ask what the goal of the researchers are. In the case of fluid mechanics they may research new algorithms that make into the software mechanical engineers use, even if they don't understand the algorithms thems
30.
by KalMann 11mo ago
I don't get why people act like this definition is so circular. If you were to explain in detail what "transforms as a second rank tensor" means then it wouldn't be circular anymore. This just isn't the full definit

More ›