JungleGymSam

6 ms·

1.
by JungleGymSam 2mo ago
stop. children need humans not AI. i hate this.
2.
by JungleGymSam 6mo ago
nah.
3.
by JungleGymSam 6mo ago
what a disgusting idea.
4.
by JungleGymSam 7mo ago
you don't actually believe that is a one sided thing do you?
5.
by JungleGymSam 11mo ago
That better reflects the scientists paid by a government to carry out an agenda like scary "climate change". No one "denies climate". That's stupid.
6.
by JungleGymSam 11mo ago
No one "denies climate". Stop being ridiculous. What people deny, because there's no evidence, is human-caused catastrophic global warming. Funny that it used to be called global cooling. Then it became global warming. And no
7.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
That's not happening anymore. Time to be adults, instead of terrified children, and find alternatives to lockdowns and mask-shaming with the occasional assault, and arrests from local governments.
8.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
So sayeth Arthanos!
9.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
Yes. The amount of control fear allows is too good to pass up.
10.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
Did you read the article?
11.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
Did you read the article?
12.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
Because China is a big threat to our future security and economy and there are ongoing and historical issues that have never been addressed? They are a human rights nightmare? Why do people side with China so easily?
13.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
Everything you've said has demonstrated that you're _choosing_ not to understand, or agree with, his arguments rather than disagreeing with them through counter arguments and evidence.
14.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
I'm not going to try to convince you of this but I have to let you know that everything you said is untrue.
15.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
> Absolutely nobody hates meritocracies... Your very next sentence goes on to disprove that.
16.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
They could have also refrained from protesting and rioting over a demonstrably false narrative of death-by-police.
17.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
Is this a serious question?
18.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
I don't share your admiration for "the top".
19.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
Maybe but surely you don't believe someone couldn't come up with a reasonable solution to that problem, right?
20.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
Democract v. Republican governor. Duh.
21.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
This is SJW right-speak: vague words that can mean anything to anyone interpreting them at the time. There are no hard and fast rules because the language doesn't allow for it. It's always shifting and getting hard to comply with
22.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
Ahh yes. Good old "hate": It can be applied to anyone on the outs with the good-ones.
23.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
Yes. That's a given.
24.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
I, for one, welcome our science-understanding overlords.
25.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
Then the problem is the truck driver is driving too much. He should drive less.
26.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
I don't believe the concept of "voting by mail" is at question. It's the method of getting the ballots into individuals' hands. Sounds like you're referring to absentee ballots where someone registers in advanc
27.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
28.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
This is the same thought I had on a recent article about "treating" ADHD with exercise. lol
29.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
This guy has a decent overall point but you know he's a prick when he implies being able to acquire a big flag quickly means ignoring the need for acquiring masks. Does he know the persons tasked with acquiring those things? Does he kn
30.
by JungleGymSam 6y ago
> Rather than creating some drama or calling out a GNOME developer, why not see if you can implement the feature? That's not how it works anymore. If you don't give me the free thing in exactly the way _I_ want it, you are oppr

More ›