Jtype

6 ms·

1.
by Jtype 4y ago
The FBI has been known to misrepresent information to judges to obtain warrants. It's not the judges that are exceeding their authority.
2.
by Jtype 4y ago
demand won't be low if that's when everyone is charging their EVs. lol
3.
by Jtype 4y ago
nope. hundreds of miles away actually.
4.
by Jtype 4y ago
What makes you think that the universities can survive without the current staffing levels? I assure you that with the maze of current funding structures, reporting requirements, travel planning, visa work, unfunded government mandates, etc
5.
by Jtype 4y ago
The entire conversation is about laptop and desktop OSes. The complaint is that all OSes for these devices have changed for the worse and continue to do so. These devices will continue to be produced and used, but by fewer people. These peo
6.
by Jtype 4y ago
You ignore the points made in the article by pointing out how more people are consumers on their electronic devices today. You point out how this change affected mobile devices and browser based consumption. However computer users are not a
7.
by Jtype 4y ago
You don't provide any evidence to refute OP, and you use vitriol in your reply. EV cars use more rare elements that require more mining is true. So one would assume that the initial CO2 generated in the productions to be higher. The gr
8.
by Jtype 4y ago
And removing "-"?
9.
by Jtype 4y ago
Ironically, this shows that we should be focusing more on test results and less on other factors, which is the opposite of the current movement.
10.
by Jtype 4y ago
You make many assertions and back none of them up with any evidence. You assert that the programs exist to segregate the school, with no evidence. You assert that more resources are spent on gifted programs without any evidence. You assert
11.
by Jtype 4y ago
I don't think reddit and in particular /r/science should be held aloft as a beacon of reason and good thinking. The pseudo science and junk that is regularly upvoted there proves that they should more frequently question the
12.
by Jtype 4y ago
Take an economics course.
13.
by Jtype 4y ago
The larger factories existed within the currently high government regulation, so assuming larger factories would result from less regulation isn't in evidence.
14.
by Jtype 4y ago
This is less of a "free market" problem than it is an overregulation problem. The article states that the primary issues are state granted monopolies and tariffs on imports, neither of which are "free market".
15.
by Jtype 4y ago
Except for all the bots.
16.
by Jtype 4y ago
Lol, your logic is flawed. >if removing central planing makes communism not communism anymore, then adding those "minor tweaks" make capitalism not capitalism anymore. The minor tweaks to make capitalism work still allow privat
17.
by Jtype 4y ago
Capitalism requires minor tweaks to work, such as anti- monopolistic laws, but the tweaks required to make communism work, such as removing central planning, make it not communism anymore.
18.
by Jtype 4y ago
You need to do a lot more reading if you think equality of opportunity and equality of output are the same. Saying that everyone should have equal rights and treatment under the law is a far cry from saying that everyone deserves the same o
19.
by Jtype 4y ago
"concrete evidence" ???
20.
by Jtype 4y ago
So doing the right thing for the wrong reasons? I'm still hoping that it passes.
21.
by Jtype 4y ago
Utopian thinking has always, and will always, lead to disaster. There will never be a 'perfect' world for humanity, we have enough historic evidence to show how foolhardy it is to try. On the other hand, optimizing for a better b
22.
by Jtype 4y ago
This is not true. My daughter's phone supported VoLTE but was not on the whitelist and service was terminated based on the IMEI. We had to order her a new (but actually older) phone that was on the approved list in order to reactiva
23.
by Jtype 4y ago
Simple takes.
24.
by Jtype 4y ago
"thinly veiled suggestions of covert maliciousness sprinkled in." This could be your bad-faith reading of the stories, though. You are "reading between the lines" and seeing statements that aren't actually there, th
25.
by Jtype 4y ago
because $$$
26.
by Jtype 4y ago
Sure, banning users from posting a published news story is "permissive".
27.
by Jtype 4y ago
I think that you severely underestimate the pushback against the woke crusade that is building. The fact that you think anyone who isn't woke is racist, shows your ignorance in the matter.
28.
by Jtype 4y ago
They were wrong about a crapload of things. They completely censored the Biden Laptop story and called it Russian propaganda. Twitter and facebook banned accounts that posted links to the story, for example. Just because you don't want
29.
by Jtype 4y ago
So you think we should be able to label a group of people and restrict their rights? You don't see how this could be a problem?
30.
by Jtype 4y ago
Because people like to complain about change, and people like to blame white people for all of societies ills at the moment.

More ›