Jerrrrrrry

5 ms·

1.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
Lolol. It's a chess thread, say it. We are pawns, hoping to be maybe a Rook to the King by endgame. Some think we can promote our pawns to Queens to match. Luckily, the Jester muses!
2.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
Maximum compression should push ALL the 'work' to the compression alg, leaving essentially (no correlative bits) 'random' data to be decompressed. Good compression, by definition, would leave small artifacts in the data,
3.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>This almost worked, but I found that the first chunk was always failing to transmit through the firewall Magic numbers/header scanning or, if it was awhile back, BOM (byte order mark) messing stuff up.
4.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
This color is beautiful, the deleted comment was likely nasty, and Stallman was right. Nuance;
5.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
not 'good' but maximum compression, yes.
6.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
> The audience here skews towards those the truth. The truth is that this sentence is believed by every audience ever convened. Actually you are correct, I should had known better to type "truth", as if a thing exi
7.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
et tú, too?
8.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>I quit since. apparently they have too :)
9.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
However, this format doesn't immediately squash critical opinions (besides ␟ stuff), which eventually allows critical discourse to actually occur. Other side promote engagement. This site still rewards discourse.
10.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
Remember, the Gentleman's agreement of "no politics" was left unsaid until one party broke it, which divided america.
11.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
The audience here skews towards those the truth. Of course, the ones that cannot tolerate any dissenting opinion will either whine or leave.
12.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
Remember, secure encryption, good compression, and truely random data are indistinguishable. It's best to paste that encrypted payload into a JPG with some bullshit magic headers and upload that to a trusted Exfil pivot instead. Or, to
13.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
encode it with enough filler as to reduce its "entropy" :)
14.
Using Dangerous AI, but Safely? [video](youtube.com)
1 points by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago|0 comments
15.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>'thinking' vs 'just recombinating things If there is a difference, and LLM's can do one but not the other... >By that standard (and it is a good standard), none of these "AI" things are doing
16.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
an LLM would complain that their internal model does not refelct their current input/output. Since LLM's knows people knock off/test/run afoul/mistakes can be made, it would then raise that as a possibility and like
17.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
musical goalposts, gotta love it. These LLM's just exhibited agency. Swallow your pride.
18.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
ga!
19.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>second order chilling effects in the context of preventing leaks: if/when this nears ubiquity, the first ID'ing of leaks will obviously lead to the second effect of deterring further leaks. >their ability to out
20.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
Also, his remarks during the Jan6th meandering are indiscernable from MLK's or others, but had the "violent" (no broken statues, no fires, no fatalities...?) "insurrection" been any less "welcomed", then h
21.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
if googles' "Add to Dictionary" button worked more than their new 100+ languages i wouldn't felt gaslit by the same words having needed re-googled weekly
22.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
trivial grammar/spelling mistakes are worse than running analogies into the ground without hitting the "context" button, or even the reductio ad absurdium train HN has been on lately. yes my latin half-Freudian trans-allitera
23.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
the point here is to dissipate it across enough mediums as to be indiscernible from noisy background fluctuations regardless of existence, giving general-deniability to all mediums eventually, thru signal to noise ratio. all security is jus
24.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
[x] is just [y] with more steps Stenography is just security by more obscurity. Specifically, shuffling compression, bit-rate, encryption, and barely human-perceivable signal around mediums (x-M) to obscure the entrophic/random state o
25.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
X to doubt, full of self-important wieners with pitiful imaginations, that are jealous my "red" is "redder" than their "red": I cant actually picture red; but its a lack of articulateness and a vocal minority r
26.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>should be considered, and are Not as much as they should be, was his point. Saying something is not proper is the No True Scotsman fallacy.
27.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
Seems too, doesn't it. Sucks that your results may vary
28.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
better to let them die in vain and lose irreplicable, un-re-execable data?
29.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
triple false-flags to sow/reap FUD
30.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
Both can be true! This is essentially making it easier to do [x] argument, which itself is essentially security through obscurity. It was always possible to do watermark everything: any nearly-imperceptible bit can be used to encode data th

More ›