Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Jensson
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
1.
▲
by
Jensson
5d ago
There is plenty transmission capacity, the issue is EU regulations not allowing Sweden to keep prices low in the south.
2.
▲
by
Jensson
19d ago
> there is very much a plausible world in which only a small handful of consolidated bank accounts exist so long as those bank accounts can reasonably control the monopoly of violence. Capitalism means separation of violence from capital
3.
▲
by
Jensson
19d ago
> It probably does work good however Switzerland got dangerously close to "something happening" this year with the 10M referendum. And it was very close, with major parts of the country showing an absurd level of ignorance Swit
4.
▲
by
Jensson
19d ago
Why wouldn't it work if Switzerland was poorer? Are poor people dumber and make stupid decisions if you give them direct democracy, or what do you mean? I don't see what would break if for example Netherlands copied Swiss direct d
5.
▲
by
Jensson
26d ago
> It's also been shown in studies that nonviolent felonies are imposed against minorities at a much higher rate, for the same crimes. This also applies to men, so is it a white matriarchal system oppressing men and minorities?
6.
▲
by
Jensson
28d ago
The whole point why anyone cares about these proofs is that the things we learn as we make the proof might add value, proving p = np itself isn't interesting, that knowledge has no application and therefore no value in itself. I have p
7.
▲
by
Jensson
28d ago
Axioms don't exist independently from our feelings and processes, we pick axioms we feel are good, and axioms defines mathematics. Mathematicians even argue which axioms we should have, it isn't objective in the slightest, mathema
8.
▲
by
Jensson
28d ago
Why wouldn't you be able to do that without a proof? I don't see the value of the proof here, just ask the AI to solve the problem you want and the proof isn't needed.
9.
▲
by
Jensson
28d ago
But at that point you have full AGI and its not just today's models. Today's models still need humans to understand things since it builds upon human knowledge. When you have full AGI of course you no longer need humans to underst
10.
▲
by
Jensson
28d ago
> It would be very useful to have an oracle tells us whether or not RH is correct. For what? Which product becomes better if it is correct?
11.
▲
by
Jensson
28d ago
A proof that they are the same is of no use either, since it too wouldn't help you find algorithms that are faster. You would need an algorithm that finds solutions, not just a proof they exist. So the value here would almost entirely
12.
▲
by
Jensson
28d ago
p = np doesn't produce any value though, the stuff you learn solving it might but the fact that they are the same wouldn't be valuable at all.
13.
▲
by
Jensson
29d ago
But currently we are in a very temporary supply shock, and its called a shortage. > in a free market happens via price increases and in an unfree market happens via shortages Since people have earmarked purchases in advance the market is
14.
▲
by
Jensson
1mo ago
Going to church is equivalent to watching tv, its not work.
15.
▲
by
Jensson
1mo ago
Europe is already acting, its the rest of the world that isn't.
16.
▲
by
Jensson
1mo ago
CO2 and global warming makes the world more arable, not less. So famine wont be an issue, some parts of the world might be but not Europe.
17.
▲
by
Jensson
1mo ago
> But how many times can you take a piece of Ikea furniture apart and put it back together again? How many times can you take apart regular furniture and put it back together again? Most furniture doesn't come apart at all, just mov
18.
▲
by
Jensson
1mo ago
Cavemen invented language, language isn't just combination of concepts, it requires defining all the concepts.
19.
▲
by
Jensson
1mo ago
Then they start a coding bootcamp.
20.
▲
by
Jensson
1mo ago
HN removes every post that doesn't get upvotes, especially if they get lots of comments.
21.
▲
by
Jensson
1mo ago
> Firstly it’s not curing anything, it’s yielding some improvement It did cure some people, it yielded some improvements on average but it did yield extreme improvements in some people. That part isn't controversial. > (and even
22.
▲
by
Jensson
1mo ago
If anesthetics cured Alzheimer's temporarily then any surgery would get the same effect and we would already know about it.
23.
▲
by
Jensson
1mo ago
But that would suggest that this cures some form of Alzheimer's but not all forms. If your Alzheimer's is caused by poor drainage due to a one off blockage this would solve it completely, but if its due to something else this woul
24.
▲
by
Jensson
1mo ago
Reddits owner is also petty and insecure and edited other peoples posts, Elon hasn't done that yet. Didn't seem to stop reddit from getting popular, people don't really care that much.
25.
▲
by
Jensson
1mo ago
It does motivate their product though, the market for legal csam adjacent content is big and the other providers wont let you do that with their models.
26.
▲
by
Jensson
1mo ago
> Data access doesn't really explain it unless all labs simultaneously got access to some treasure trove of data. They have data from their competitors model outputs. It is very hard to serve an LLM without also exposing how it work
27.
▲
by
Jensson
1mo ago
Yes, and that is why you can't say "its as smart as a single human" and think its as smart as humans, because humans can get smarter by cooperating, if the AI can't do that to create a smarter AI it is not as smart as hu
28.
▲
by
Jensson
1mo ago
> Would you trust a bridge built by a single human? But an AI doesn't replace a single human, it replaces every human in the project, so it needs to match a team of humans not a single human.
29.
▲
by
Jensson
1mo ago
It only works until people try to withdraw money that doesn't exist. The less people believe the earlier that happens, but it will happen sooner or later.
30.
▲
by
Jensson
1mo ago
Physics possibly.
More ›