Jenk

20 ms·

1.
by Jenk 3d ago
Yes, because it's _only_ "modern fintech" that are susceptible to social engineering, right? Oh.. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/02/04/asia/deepfake-cfo-scam-ho...
2.
by Jenk 21d ago
Just for anecdata: I'm using simplelogin to alias my emails and I can see there is a 20ish minute window between when Simplelogin receives an email, to when it finally shows up in my Proton inbox. Normally it's an inconsequential
3.
by Jenk 21d ago
The point though, is that they package 3rd party applications and libraries. If they ban AI, they won't stop packaging apps and libraries from parties that do use AI. They wouldn't even know who does or doesn't.
4.
by Jenk 27d ago
I have very little in my agents.md file wrt style, except for: > Caveats belong inline, no "one thing to note" or "it's worth mentioning" footer. If it is worth raising or calling out, do so where it is most rele
5.
by Jenk 28d ago
Well, the Ubuntu logo has suddenly clicked. How did I not see it before?!
6.
by Jenk 2mo ago
The (many) interior designers we consulted before renovating our house used A/VR to show us what those changes could look like. The AR experience was the most surreal and useful, though.
7.
by Jenk 2mo ago
"That guy has lots of money so he must be successful, clever, and probably correct, so I'm going to support them" is still an aspiration - and you probably should realise that there are people in dollar stores that think &quo
8.
by Jenk 2mo ago
> I do not understand why anyone else would go along with this. Aspirations.
9.
by Jenk 2mo ago
$165k won't get you far on salaried engineers. There's every chance that 1 engineer, assuming Anthropic employs them, is on $500k or more. Assuming average of $336k in that pool of 50 engineers, then for 11 days for 50 engineers y
10.
by Jenk 4mo ago
> - Not sure what they're called, but I've seen a lot of fully automated outdoor "locker stations" for packet deliveries Drop boxes! I was part of a team prototyping these some 20 years ago. I highly doubt we were the
11.
by Jenk 4mo ago
https://www.thek6project.co.uk/the-crowns-on-k6-telephone-bo... there's a note about Hull's phone boxes at the bottom of this page.
12.
by Jenk 4mo ago
If the title simply said "AI is out-performing humans at CTF" then none of this confusion exists. Nothing is "broken," we don't need to be superfluous with "frontier," and the point is still there.
13.
by Jenk 4mo ago
I've found the first, and most important, step for any team or organisation to eliminate concerns with NFRs, "tech debt", and whatever else it may be called, is to stop giving it a name. I'm being completely serious. By
14.
by Jenk 5mo ago
Ditto, launchpad.net is also extremely flaky.
15.
by Jenk 5mo ago
I do trunk based dev. My colleagues prefer git. I still prefer to use jj.
16.
by Jenk 5mo ago
It doesn't need you to think that way at all. `jj new` simply means "create a new commit [ontop of <location>]" - you don't have to describe it immediately. I never do. I know that the intention was to do that, and
17.
by Jenk 5mo ago
No that is correct when in colocate mode (which is the default mode). Simply removing the .jj folder will "de-jj" the repo entirely, but will leave you in a headless state. Simple to fix with a `git switch` though. If you are _not
18.
by Jenk 5mo ago
This is literally jj's schtick and reason for existing, so I wouldn't be surprised if you decide it is not the tool for you.
19.
by Jenk 5mo ago
You don't replace. jj is backed by git anyway.
20.
by Jenk 5mo ago
Tbf you wouldn't use/switch to jj for (because of) those kind of commands, and are quite the outlier in the grand list of reasons to use jj. However the option to use the revset language in that manner is a high-ranking reason to
21.
by Jenk 5mo ago
Claude's settings don't appear to be in sync with the published settings schema[0]. [0]: https://www.schemastore.org/claude-code-settings.json .
22.
by Jenk 5mo ago
Or a colon: Windows Subsystem for: Linux
23.
by Jenk 6mo ago
I switched to Jaq[0] a while back for the 'correctness' sake rather than performance. But Jaq also claims to be more performant than jq. [0]: https://github.com/01mf02/jaq
24.
by Jenk 6mo ago
Yes but it is easy to abuse/misuse IME, in that I think it requires one to maintain your own sense of discipline for the principle separation rather than the library/framework guide you into it. The threshold between UI and state
25.
by Jenk 6mo ago
Might be naive, but this has always been a concern of the view-model for me. Every GUI change results in a VM change via event/command. The VM becomes gospel for UI state which means reducers are much simpler, and my actual model doesn
26.
by Jenk 6mo ago
The humans operating the LLM are accountable.
27.
by Jenk 6mo ago
> Except your team is full of occasionally insane "people" who hallucinate, lie, and cover things up. Wait.. are we talking about LLMs or humans here?
28.
by Jenk 6mo ago
I stand corrected. It makes sense that it is a chroot/rootfs rather than fully independent VMs. re: side-by-side running, I always get socket and/port port problems when doing that. Without having looked into it at all I figure it
29.
by Jenk 6mo ago
Every time you run `wsl --install <distro>` you are creating a new VM. Every time you run `wsl --unregister <instance id or name/>` your are removing a VM. It is these two operations at the heart of OP's app.
30.
by Jenk 6mo ago
diff --side-by-side or use `-y` for short-hand.

More ›