JeffffreyF

6 ms·

1.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
The only reason to banish anonominity is to prevent dissenting opinion. Period.
2.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
Great idea. Liars and thieves would kill it. They kill all the ideas that can work, until liars and thieves are under control nothing will change.
3.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
Costs them money. When it makes them money, only then will you hear from them. Do no evil, as beautiful a plan as that was, is not what is in the new peoples hearts. A shame isn't it?
4.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
But that's not the issue being debated. The issue is tracking the communications of people we disagree with. Let's be crystal clear about that. They're trying to bury the intent in another issue to confuse people and get what they want. The
5.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
I do too, but it wouldn't matter if we had good men as lawmakers. That's the problem, we are led by fools.
6.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
Really, really bad news travels oh so fast.
7.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
The bill is a pure lie. They worry about anonymous dissidents, not pornagraphers. They use the word "child" to promote fear and confusion they can hide behide. Nothing new, WE HAVE SEEN THEIR KIND BEFORE. And on it goes.
8.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
Downvotes will always mean "I don't agree". It's like saying "I don't want to get wet so turn off the rain". No, no, no , us better people can change the weather, we are ELITE.
9.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
Republican ideology at is finest. Downvote away.
10.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
Oh, hell no. Scorching Amazon for scorching the earth is exactly what is needed. You cannot comprehend the reality of a common good.
11.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
It is working, its just far, far from what its users really need. Just like Windows. All about a better user experience and we as leaders are missing the point. Nobody is setting a useful standard, nobody with power is looking at it from th
12.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
Philosophically, you can blame Capitalism, at least in the abstract. Every man for himself is why they have these problems, and that is the heart of Capitalism. Because they don't think of society and really only their own rewards, they are
13.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
It's not at all hard, it's a philosophical problem. They simply believe their concerns are more important than the users. It's not hard or complicated, they're just philosophicaly fools because they believe what they want matters. It doesn'
14.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
Much, much better not to see a stream of ads. That's what's being left out of the discussion. The truth. Don't forget about the point of everything, to make a better life for the living, not just the shareholders. That seems to get left out
15.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
Everybody get over it, preventing anonominity and privacy (as each individual personally feels it), is a fools game. In the long run there will be no (as in absolute zero) acceptance of corporate need to determine appropriate levels of priv
16.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
YOU should work for ME. I'll share the credit, promise.
17.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
Yes, the abstract thinker does hold onto more actual knowledge then the concrete detail thinker. Breadth really does outway depth in terms of true thought, but in the mechanized specialty world of now limiting the brain to be concerned with
18.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
Different was the wrong word. How is it any better(for the targeted) is the question. The assumption that " I know you'll like this" is at best a horrible guess and a lie at worst. I question the belief that tracking a few purchases gives
19.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
A shotgun or a rifle, both are pointed at targets. But yes, some would prefer a cleaner kill. What I'm saying is those who Target their customers better help mostly just themselves and there is no need to lie about it. At least for the pub
20.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
Then the kids are right, textbooks are just for losers. Losers of memory, which in the real world gets so many the "loser" tag.
21.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
Why don't we address the fact that institutional oppression is unatural?
22.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
How is it any different then say, the mormans or whatever knocking on a million doors? Sure the few who convert are happy to have been targeted, but what about all the other people who have been bothered and made to do something just to be
23.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
Symbioses is the issue. The entire f-ing problem. People refuse to give up anything to get a better relationship so they create predatory disguises, try and polish them up and endlessly research ways to hunt customers instead of being one w
24.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
That is a great, great essay. Paul G is a master abstract thinker.
25.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
Judged by reality, by what really is, the truth. It's been called lots of things and names but it is just what is. People can't judge intentions accuratly, thus the incredible confusion over whether it matters. It's a matter of faith I supp
26.
by JeffffreyF 15y ago
Make no mistake, you are only judged by your true intentions. People,and life, is imperfect and endlessly flawed, what was intended is really all you have in the end, all that really matters to the truth. Yes, results change circumstances