James001

6 ms·

1.
by James001 10y ago
It is not tenuous to suggest that modern agricultural crops will yield more in a higher CO2 environment (look into greenhouses). It is actually far less tenuous than speculating that CO2 is causing runaway global warming.
2.
by James001 10y ago
You must have never delved too much into science then. There are certain claims that have been well established for so long that citations are no longer needed. For example, we don't need citations to state the order of colours in a ra
3.
by James001 10y ago
It's well established that increased CO2 leads to increased plant biomass, thereby satisfying my claim that it leads to increased agricultural yield (as per greenhouses for example). My claim that increased CO2 leads to more biodiversi
4.
by James001 10y ago
Really? You're going to extrapolate from lower nitrogen levels in plants in higher CO2 conditions (without a citation, might i add) to higher CO2 levels causing overall lower nutrition? and more aggressive soil depletion? Keep in mind
5.
by James001 10y ago
Almost all of those cases can have explanations that are not global warming related. For example, in Canada those fires were huge because of too-efficient fire suppression methods. Not enough controlled fires were done in that area and Fort
6.
by James001 10y ago
I can take all that money if you'd like and plant a few trees?
7.
by James001 10y ago
Thank god for negative feedback loops eh? I'm actually glad we have more CO2 in the atmosphere, because it will increase biodiversity and agricultural yields. I don't see any evidence that climate change is proceeding at a fast en
8.
by James001 10y ago
Hey Eddie, thanks for getting back to me. I was wondering when image recognition was going to play a stronger role in the use of drones for agriculture. When I was doing it, it was simply using combinations of spectral bands and not really
9.
by James001 10y ago
Hey, thanks for responding. I'm curious what the custom-built sensors for specific diseases are? Are you using hyperspectral cameras? I know there was a lot of research into spectral fingerprints of specific diseases. Also, in regards
10.
by James001 10y ago
Hey Nikhil, I am interested in what you are using drones for in agriuculture. I was using drones about 2 years ago for farming and helping farmers optimize different things and am curious how far it's come since then. Back then, we wer
11.
by James001 10y ago
Really? You're going to deny online access to people with emotional issues? That's like, the entire population. That's not even a slippery slope, that's just falling off the cliff entirely.
12.
by James001 10y ago
I'm from Canada, and all I can say is I wish the doctors up here actually listened to your opinion on your own medical condition. While it is important to consult and listen to doctors, I do think people trust their doctors too much. P
13.
by James001 10y ago
^ One of the only reasonable responses here.
14.
by James001 10y ago
Wow, we must've watched different shows then. I thought the cinematography was incredible! easily beats out almost anything hollywood produces otherwise. A beautiful show perspecitve-wise. I just really don't agree with your inter
15.
by James001 10y ago
But of course it the lymphatic system eliminates toxins too. I mean, obviously this is all getting into semantics, but the lymphatic system helps to eliminate more than just metabolic products and waste, it will also help eliminate dead bac
16.
by James001 10y ago
what...? Do you not know any biology at all? Of course the lymphatic system is meant to eliminate toxins... Jeez, take some bio 101 before posting, you sound like a quack
17.
by James001 10y ago
The lymphatic system is specifically for removing toxins, so naturally it's function is implied
18.
by James001 10y ago
tbh, I found this much more confusing to read than normal biology papers.
19.
by James001 10y ago
> The specific makeup of Lichens though, is an extremely niche field, that doesn't affect the broader field of Biology in any significant way. Well you would be wrong. This guy almost single-handedly led the way to enabling the cult
20.
by James001 10y ago
no she wouldn't. Look at the whole emailgate scandal.
21.
by James001 10y ago
He's not a murderer, unlike the other option
22.
by James001 10y ago
He's not a murderer, unlike the other option
23.
by James001 10y ago
It was very Machiavellian. Unfortunate that we're just hearing crickets on the international level though. It's a damn shame that a systematic rebuke of Erdogan's official narrative isn't anywhere in the mainstream media
24.
by James001 10y ago
The coup was never real to begin with. There have been so many holes in this narrative that it's like swiss cheese. Why did the military not fire on Erdogan when he was in their sights? Why did Erdogan even risk flying into Istanbul wh
25.
by James001 10y ago
I'm sorry if I've angered you by showing you that the scientific method doesn't produce perfect science, just like the methods of science that psychology use doesn't produce perfect science either. I'm not rumbling,
26.
by James001 10y ago
Strawmen for days! Just answer me this: Do you believe that the science is purely limited to the scientific method? Just riddle me that and I'll be content. Just keep in mind that you'll be outing yourself as scientifically illite
27.
by James001 10y ago
ah, good, no substantial reply. I thought you were just trolling and you were. Thank you for justifying everything I just said. Glad to know you agree that science does not = the scientific method
28.
by James001 10y ago
The replication crisis isn't only within the soft sciences, but nice try. According to a 2016 poll of 1,500 scientists, 70% of them failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments (50% failed to reproduce their own experiment)
29.
by James001 10y ago
Arbitrary confines of science is when you limit science to the scientific method. Well-defined science is frankly an insult to science
30.
by James001 10y ago
> You can't have less/more reliable knowledge. Science can't be half-wrong and half-right. I wasn't trolling, but I think you might be? Of course science can be more/less reliable or half-wrong/half-right. T

More ›