Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ItsMe000001
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
1.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
Could you please tell me what exactly is "uncivil" in my comment? Oh and by he way, I could not care less about some stupid "ban". First, it's not like I need anything from you or this site, second, I don't thi
2.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
> You're reading in some stuff that isn't intended. What a coincidence, same thing I said to you! Why do you make a stupid reply when you know it's stupid?
3.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
It is the head of a private equity backed business. That he also happens to be a dermatologist is not the key - unless you think he would have complained if he were only a dermatologist and not a big-business owner? From the NY article: &
4.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
How much time you spend depends on your data structures. If the easy default options are good enough you don't need to sweat. We make heavy use of disjoint unions, and while the simple case here too is easy, some things that we do - al
5.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
Same here. I have been using Flow (mostly) and TS (occasionally, including counter-checking problems in Flow to see what TS does in a similar case). Overall I would not go back to the time without a type checker, however, I too am mystified
6.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
Quoting a self-proclaimed mission statement as "proof" of anything, really? And no, you did not think this through, or you are just grossly uninformed. Example: https://youtu.be/ZTC_RxWN_xo Private business only
7.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
Discussion on reddit in /r/medicine, by actual medical professionals AFAICS: https://old.reddit.com/r/medicine/comments/9rpajq/dermatolog... Copy of the starter comment by OP there: > Start
8.
▲
Some private equity firms are furious over a paper in a dermatology journal
(nytimes.com)
449 points
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
|
165 comments
9.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
You actually make his point stronger: Given the difficulty, there are far too few people in it. Instead, people flock to the easy stuff. That's because who pays you if you don't get results within a few years at most? Which is har
10.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
But they invest in businesses that each have a plan that you know has a chance to work. Big difference between investing into the completely unknown. Besides, his 9/10 is way too optimistic. For basic research it is more like zero chan
11.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
That is an insane price. Here in Germany I last paid 70 Euros on top of what insurance pays for (which is the very basics - and yes, they pay for amalgam fillings) for a composite fillings. Which one exactly I don't know but it was wha
12.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
Sorry for the downvotes. I received chelation therapy after years and years of very strange accumulating issues that some day crossed a threshold where they could no longer be ignored. I had actually not seen that coming and called myself h
13.
▲
Ban organophosphate pesticides to protect children's health, experts say
(theguardian.com)
252 points
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
|
99 comments
14.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
> the biological signals attenuate with distance from source The voltage signal is propagated in axons sometimes over very long distances (a meter, e.g. from the foot to the spine). It is renewed (see "Nodes of Ranvier") along
15.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
But whether or not the incoming signals ever lead to a new action potential depends on so many factors (spacial, temporal, chemical, biological,... and it's all dynamic on many levels) that can all be called "analog" and are
16.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
Wouldn't one use two-photon microscopy? Patch clamp is quite limited in comparison. There also is the combination of both methods - not surprisingly, they write how hard it is in a living brain (the clamping, the two-photon microscopy
17.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
That is one of my favorite videos. However, in this context, what do you propose? WWII was a "real war", it was easy to see you were on the good side and that it was worth fighting. Besides, that huge ("world") war alrea
18.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
I don't understand. That happened when US military might was at an all time high. We are talking about fears about future weakness here. Why do you think an even larger lead (compared to the next few countries taken together) than the
19.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
Do you mean the US (territory) itself is threatened, or do you mean the ability for "power projection" (to arbitrary places around the globe) is going to be hindered? What exactly is it that you fear? If another country were to
20.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
Hello Dick, oh so you found a mirror, great! I doubt self-reflection is something a troll like you is capable of though, given that your ability to parse simple English without self-projecting your own - pretty limited and frankly a bit stu
21.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
There also is https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1311149/why-are-iq-... In particular, the comment by Ron Maimon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient#Current_... has a f
22.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
Just to continue the aside, it actually is perfectly normally distributed, since it is a purely statistical measure. http://michna.com/iq.htm
23.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
Why are you being so nasty? > This implies Why don't you stick to what I wrote? You respond to the straw man your own imagination creates. > is the idea that knowledge is unnecessary See above. You are being quite ridiculous. ht
24.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
I don't understand the purpose of your reply. You built a straw man which you now attack. I didn't say "data structures don't matter" or whatever else you interpret into my comment. Also read my other reply to anoth
25.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
You are not saying anything that I did not already respond to. I know trees, I know priority queues, I completely understand the data structure. What's the point of being able to assign some completely made-up and arbitrary name to it?
26.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
This is the first time ever I hear about "max heap", or quite possibly I heard it and promptly forgot it. No, I don't accept your implication about my credentials and how I fared in practice since getting the degree in 1997 s
27.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
The main ingredient yes, but there is other stuff added to get specific properties. https://www.plasticsintl.com/blog/what-are-the-ingredients-i... Just like "metal" isn't 100% Fe atoms (or Cu or whateve
28.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
> I'm not sure why this is a controversial statistic. Did anybody here dispute the statistics? I must have missed that. I think you ignored about 2/3 of what I wrote (yes, I edited my comment, if you used a notification service
29.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
I don't see that those enrollment rates are of use for the discussion, that they show anything useful. Especially given the difference in cost and the high number of (paying) international students supporting the US system. Not to ment
30.
▲
by
ItsMe000001
8y ago
I don't understand your very low college enrollment figures. Also, if you look at Germany, there are "Universität", "Hochschule" - but also "Fachhochschule". Enrollment is at almost 60% - according to the
More ›