Imanari

5 ms·

1.
by Imanari 14d ago
Is that possible? What subscription would that be? 'Google AI Plus'?
2.
by Imanari 1mo ago
I find it very intriguing. I reminds me of the insight in the early days that prompting the models to "think step by step" gave big performance boosts. Here we basically tell the models "You have an internal monologue/J-
3.
by Imanari 1mo ago
Testing it in Pi.dev and liking the speed a lot! Huge improvements from past gemini models regarding tool calls and agentic capabilities
4.
by Imanari 1mo ago
Great thread, I was just thinking about compaction. My current line of thought is that compaction/pruning/ctx management in general should be something ongoing and maybe recursive. For example: User:'How is auth implemented?&
5.
by Imanari 1mo ago
I am surprised at 'removes actual tool calls/results, tool output'. Your approach with /prune seems to be 'keep the WHAT, remove the HOW (we got here)'. I would have thought that the HOW contains some useful si
6.
by Imanari 2mo ago
What is wrong with "please make plot XYZ in plotly?"
7.
by Imanari 2mo ago
How do you run 'deep research'?
8.
by Imanari 2mo ago
Here is what most people miss…
9.
by Imanari 2mo ago
There is a technique where you keep your hand almost still and move the whole arm instead. https://youtu.be/-F8SA_QySkc?is=z0P7I8loxuHVwKXn
10.
by Imanari 2mo ago
So its basically (a plan + a bunch of file reads + a first edit) injected into the context of a cheap model so the cheap model does not feel like it has to re-read the files and just continues executing and editing?
11.
by Imanari 2mo ago
I think a Q&A-based approach is could also be a suitable way to capture the reasoning behind a project. Instead of writing documentation afterward, an AI could interview the developer throughout the process and preserve the questions an
12.
by Imanari 2mo ago
Did you experiment with the Pruner completely replacing the Reranker?
13.
by Imanari 3mo ago
I'll take it ;)
14.
by Imanari 3mo ago
I started to take VitD on a whim and my mood and energy sure improved. Also I feel like I get sick less often. 3 friends whom I recommended VitD told me the same. Living in northern germany. YMMV.
15.
by Imanari 3mo ago
This mirrors my experience. I have been using it in Pi. It is smart and output is good but it is not efficient in getting there.
16.
by Imanari 3mo ago
Only tangentially related: MiMo-2.5Pro is fast, cheap and very capable, although not quite gpt5.5 level iontelligence (I dont use the claudes). It works flawlessly in Pi and is an excellent workhorse. I expect big things from their next mod
17.
by Imanari 3mo ago
I always feel GPT5.5 is better at ‘getting the bigger picture‘ when I am describing something vaguely vs Chinese models. What’s your experience with that?
18.
by Imanari 4mo ago
What do the model have as inputs? What’s their harness like? Just price data or are they free to pull reports etc. from the web?
19.
by Imanari 4mo ago
Very cool work! Regarding your finding "the tool ran successfully and returned data" and "the tool ran successfully but found nothing." Couldn’t this be solved by designing better tool responses instead of adding another
20.
by Imanari 4mo ago
Good old aider ahead of its time
21.
by Imanari 4mo ago
That’s exactly the approach of smolagemts. The only “tool“ available is writing python code
22.
by Imanari 4mo ago
As with so many things aider.chat was ahead of its time with its ability to create deterministic scripts.
23.
by Imanari 5mo ago
Like a special parser? Would you mind elaborating?
24.
by Imanari 5mo ago
How can they fix it after the release? They would have to retrain/finetune it further, no?
25.
by Imanari 5mo ago
Just tested it via openrounter in the Pi Coding agent and it regularly fails to use the read and write tool correctly, very disappointing. Anyone know a fix besides prompting "always use the provided tools instead of writing your own c
26.
by Imanari 5mo ago
Why do the Xiami releases never get any attention? Mimo-V2-Pro was pretty good, excited to try V2.5
27.
by Imanari 5mo ago
> Listening often means not jumping to a solution; but absorbing and processing someone’s pain > When in actuality, they should [...] finding a way to solve the pain points Honest question, how do I 'absorb someones pain'? A
28.
by Imanari 5mo ago
absolutely stunning
29.
by Imanari 5mo ago
How well do the Gemma 4 models perform on agentic coding? What are your impressions?
30.
by Imanari 6mo ago
I will also leave this here https://github.com/shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code/tree/main/a... I found it excellent in explaining a CC-like coding agent in layers.

More ›