Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
HereIGoAgain
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
5mo ago
You mostly jest here i think but that seems to be the actual strategy and logic of progressive activist types so often. I mean all side tend to stick with their groups but progressives seemed to have created an argument that demands disasso
2.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
5mo ago
That's circular nonsense. It makes you someone who doesn't want others to have speech. It's not self defeating, it's the entire point of defending universal rights, especially speech. You throw around terms like "De
3.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
5mo ago
Well if you look at board you see that more than one member served in the Obama admin or directly worked for it at some point. https://www.eff.org/about/board
4.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
5mo ago
Yeah, the idea that this is simply, mostly or even partly about engagement/eyes is bunk on it's face. I'd even argue it a bad faith position to defend.
5.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
1y ago
Cool
6.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
2y ago
Don' let the door hit you on the way out i guess. I mean it sounds mean but the scene can do with less toxic types like this, who try to bully people who know better, in order to get their way. Even worse in this case since he actually
7.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
2y ago
All the extrajudicial stuff is pure political and ideological wank by a subset of ideological extremists. Pay no attention to any of it. It's an attempt to redefine the term for narrative creation purposes.
8.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
2y ago
The short of his rant is that he wants a "Code Of Standards for maintainers" in addition to a CoC, in order to witch hunt people he feels "gets in the way." Yikes, this is EXACTLY what Linus was talking about except an o
9.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
2y ago
For the sake of this issue here, does it matter which is used i wonder, because I have been unable to find any source willing to spell it out. (that is, is simply turning it off on the adapter enough)
10.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
2y ago
IPv6 has been disabled at the adapter level on my system for years. Or does it have to be reg edit and all too?
11.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
2y ago
Yup, I've been waiting to see someone point this detail out in response to the rosy adoption numbers.
12.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
2y ago
This
13.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
2y ago
Jokes on them, i've had IPv6 disabled at the adapter level for years.
14.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
2y ago
It's even worse than that. Even if these did work, the goal isn't just to make it harder.. These will act as a chilling effect on viewing, the first time there is a security risk, or it become convenient, the information will be o
15.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
2y ago
Number 02 is one of the major one i was thinking of. This shit is evil. I don't see them surviving long if they ever attempted to push this crap.
16.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
2y ago
And even deeper on my blacklist your company goes! Who did they think this was a good idea? They are doomed.. Who is going to buy this crap?
17.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
2y ago
Onto the blacklist you go.. I mean if it wasn't on it already to begin with because of the mere idea of hardware based ads. I'm not sure how they plan on surviving as a hardware maker. Who is going to buy this crap?
18.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
3y ago
Same.
19.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
3y ago
And with that twitter is once again dead to me.. Not even by choice. The layout/UI is utter crap and my computer hates it. I refuse to use it. For a short time i was able to read things.. guess it's back to nothing again. lol
20.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
3y ago
Wouldn't be surprising.
21.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
3y ago
This is pretty cool. We need to be putting a lot more resources into space tech TBH. It should ideally be a single digit percentage of the budget/GDP as a starting point. The future of mankind really rest on it.
22.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
3y ago
Interesting read.. Brings up some good points.
23.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
3y ago
It's amazing and creepy when people talk about this sort of thing like it was a simple, silly claims, talk.. We are talking about a country that as stolen, militarized and laid exclusive claim to many of the places they make claim to i
24.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
3y ago
This has been a clear danger for a while now. Beyond just mere danger at this point in fact. You guys are late to the party but it is nice to see you guys catching. This is the literal death of the internet if nothing is done to stop it.
25.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
3y ago
What a shortsighted, dangerous and all around undemocratic concept. It's scary that Germany of all places would willingly play such a dangerous and disingenuous game.
26.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
3y ago
Is this really good satire or a really bad uninformed take?
27.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
3y ago
All power to them. This is a dangerous moment in internet history. The line between its destruction, at the VERY LEAST in principle, and continued existence is in the air.. And all most people can think about is how much they don't lik
28.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
3y ago
No, it actually doesn't. The only person who even casually mentions KF, can't even be confirmed dead. Only hearsay through a friend of a friend etc.
29.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
3y ago
Why are they even threatening? This is pretty scary. They have a specific role, and it isn't judging who is allowed authenticate and who's not! This is an even bigger issue than the network level attempts to censor and much bigger
30.
▲
by
HereIGoAgain
4y ago
Pretty good read. They bring up quite a few good points.
More ›