HarfTarf

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by HarfTarf 8y ago

   I just signed up on your site, looking for kubernetes and Linux work.
2. 2.▲
   by HarfTarf 9y ago

   You could build an application on top of ipfs as an encrypted store, and use ssb to broadcast your messages to other nodes.
3. 3.▲
   by HarfTarf 9y ago

   Here's a Google translation: https://i.imgur.com/TWZLwVY.png
4. 4.▲
   by HarfTarf 9y ago

   Yes, it bothered me. I only skimmed the article looking for how it got its name, but the article never answers the question. How frustrating...
5. 5.▲
   by HarfTarf 9y ago

   My only feedback is "thanks!"
6. 6.▲
   by HarfTarf 9y ago

   As an American that has gone through the process, I can confirm that there is a lot of irrelevant junk crammed down our throats and poured into our ears.
7. 7.▲
   by HarfTarf 9y ago

   In that sense, I would agree, ipfs can provide access to content that would otherwise be blocked.
8. 8.▲
   by HarfTarf 9y ago

   make no mistake: ipfs _by_itself_ is no more "anonymous" than torrenting or other types of file sharing ftp/sftp/ssh/http/whatever... because they can always get your ip address. You will need to use some other
9. 9.▲
   by HarfTarf 9y ago

   He's stuck inside
10. 10.▲
    by HarfTarf 9y ago

    I too would pay for a "supporter badge".
11. 11.▲
    by HarfTarf 9y ago

    https://ipfs.github.io/public-gateway-checker/
12. 12.▲
    by HarfTarf 9y ago

    https://ipfs.github.io/public-gateway-checker/ It would be nice to add your gateway to the list.
13. 13.▲
    by HarfTarf 10y ago

    I read it once, and was immediately duped.
14. 14.▲
    by HarfTarf 10y ago

    You must hear lots of things that scream.
15. 15.▲
    by HarfTarf 10y ago

    If you are trying to achieve encryption, then no, you will not need https, as cjdns is encrypted at every packet be nature. If you are trying to comply to some other https related standard, then you will need https.
16. 16.▲
    by HarfTarf 10y ago

    Any physical link can support cjdns; ethernet, 2.4ghz, 5ghz.
17. 17.▲
    by HarfTarf 10y ago

    I've never heard of netsukuku until now, but from a quick glance, they are very similar except that cjdns has a much higher usage in the wild and doesnt have an answer to dns.
18. 18.▲
    by HarfTarf 10y ago

    This is ingenious, your public address is also your public key, and the payload of the packet can only be decrypted by your private key. So awesome, it has encryption built in.