HakanAbbas

9 ms·

1.
Halac (High Availability Lossless Audio Compression) First Version Source Codes(github.com)
5 points by HakanAbbas 10mo ago|1 comments
2.
by HakanAbbas 10mo ago
I have released the source code for the first version (0.1.9) of HALAC. This version uses ANS/FSE. It compiles seamlessly on platform-independent GCC, CLANG, and ICC. I have received and continue to receive many questions about the sou
3.
by HakanAbbas 1y ago
HALIC's decode speed is already much faster compared to other codecs. When you look at the compression ratios, they are almost the same. There doesn't seem to be a problem with this. There are also issues where encode speed is esp
4.
by HakanAbbas 1y ago
Storage is cheaper than it used to be. Bandwidth is also cheaper than it used to be (though not as cheap as storage). So high quality lossy techniques and lossless techniques can be adopted more than low quality lossy compression techniques
5.
by HakanAbbas 1y ago
I don't really understand what the new PNG does better. Elements such as speed or compression ratio are not mentioned. Thanks also for your kind thoughts ksec. Apart from the widespread support in codecs, there are 3 important elements
6.
Back to the Past – The Power of Rice Coding in Audio Compression (Halac 0.3)(hydrogenaud.io)
3 points by HakanAbbas 2y ago|1 comments
7.
by HakanAbbas 2y ago
HALAC (High Availability Lossless Audio Compression) is now faster and denser with version 0.3.6. Also, for a long time, both encode and decode operations can be performed in multithread. This version now uses Rice coding instead of ANS. T
8.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
Thank you for your attention. I'm trying to do my best. Regarding the open source, I answered the questions asked as follows (In HALAC Topic). "Frankly, if I publish open sources now, I can't take care of them again. Because
9.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
Thank you very much. Yes, this information is correct. Right now I have taken a break from the HALIC project and I am interested in HALAC(High Availability Lossless Audio Compression) project. I guess I will achieve the same success. https
10.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
> Frankly, if I publish open sources now, I can't take care of them again. Because there will be no excitement. I say this because I know myself very well. > When I bring my work to a certain stage, I would like to deliver it to
11.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
You say it's not worth spending time on such work, discovering new things and pondering. I understand.
12.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
Thank you for your valuable thoughts.
13.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
Thank you for your good thoughts
14.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
Thank you very much for valuable information.
15.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
When I bring my work to a certain stage, I would like to deliver it to a team that can claim it. However, I want to see how much I can improve my work alone.
16.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
Frankly, if I publish open sources now, I can't take care of them again. Because there will be no excitement. I say this because I know myself very well. When I bring my work to a certain stage, I would like to deliver it to a team tha
17.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
Hmm. Of course, we don't need to know how Oracle is fast and secure, why Autodesk is a monopoly in the industry, winrar is still used a lot despite being paid, and how Adobe's artificial intelligence-powered filters work. I am dev
18.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
At this stage, what is taken seriously is quite personal. If the source code is a requirement to take it seriously; MS Windows, MS Office, Adobe, Autodesk, Oracle, Winrar and thousands of more wonderful software should not be taken seriousl
19.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
I have no problem trying to kill criticism. I'm just trying to do what I love as a hobby(academic). Or maybe it's better for me to do things like fishing, swimming as a hobby.
20.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
HALAC and HALIC really consume very little memory. The process speed is high at the same rate. And they offer a reasonable compression rate. Therefore, they can be used at high level and different areas.
21.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
The only reason Flac is the most popular sound code is that both compression and code -solving is faster than others. The same applies to many formats such as JPEG, MP4, MP3, Rar, Zstandart. What is fast is always advantageous and is a reas
22.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
https://digialps.com/introducing-halac-new-ultra-fast-lossle...
23.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
The compression rate in audio compression is really limited. In most cases it is difficult to decrease below 50 percent. Therefore, it is not a logical choice to increase the process rate in order to provide a few percent more compression b
24.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
Thank you so much.
25.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
Thanks for the information about the license and patent. It can work with any bitrates for Halac. However, more than 2 channels and 24/32 bit support outside 16 can be added.
26.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
My works are fully cross-platform. There is no restrictive situation. I also prepared Linux and ARM versions for HALIC, but I didn't compile new versions because it didn't get much attention. When my Linux test machine is ready(cr
27.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
Yes, I'm new in hydrogenaud.io. However, I have been active since 2018 in "encode.su". This year, "3rd Global Data Compression(gdcc.tech)" organized by Huawei and Barcelona Autonoma University was held. In this comp
28.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
Thank you so much.
29.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
Yes, the HALIC uses quite low memory. Because independent small blocks work. Of course, this situation negatively affects the compression rate. It is a fact that I compromise on the compression rate to ensure less memory consumption.
30.
by HakanAbbas 3y ago
I am still at the beginning of the road in terms of compression rate and speed. There may be changes in subsequent versions.

More ›