GravityLab

7 ms·

1.
by GravityLab 2y ago
No, it’s about making it easier for users to use useful software and for developers to produce useful software at web-scale.
2.
by GravityLab 2y ago
I love that you love it so much. I put about ten hours into it to see what the hype was about a while back and had to stop…because otherwise I would’ve put in way more lol.
3.
Stop using vsts-NPM-auth, it may be a 0-day(cyrs.substack.com)
2 points by GravityLab 3y ago|0 comments
4.
The Year of the Wood Dragon and Planting More Trees(logtrees.com)
2 points by GravityLab 3y ago|0 comments
5.
by GravityLab 3y ago
We need to maintain paper-based systems of information storage and retrieval. People should be familiar with a physical map. If we are too dependent on the technology, that is a risk.
6.
by GravityLab 3y ago
Make more Internet. It is an unlimited supply. :)
7.
by GravityLab 3y ago
The correct PR is the one that solves the problem the best. The correct PR's size has nothing to do with the # of lines it is. Tracking time to merge is not that meaningful because merging code does not in itself say anything about the
8.
by GravityLab 3y ago
This is awesome news. Sounds like we not only have more runway than expected but also obtain more than expected with every tree and shrub we plant.
9.
by GravityLab 3y ago
We could easily get to net zero much, much sooner than 2050 by planting a lot more trees. It would be fun and planting trees has many other benefits besides capturing CO2.
10.
by GravityLab 3y ago
That's a neat idea. It'd be cool if they also had a school garden as well, then everyone can learn to appreciate growing their own fruits and vegetables as well. And I love your pun! :D
11.
by GravityLab 3y ago
The prime mover in any small community is an individual!
12.
by GravityLab 3y ago
I am glad to hear that it rains and is green in that corner of the desert, my friend. That is a beautiful image indeed. I am really excited about the possibility of reforesting in deserts, although deserts are beautiful habitats in themselv
13.
by GravityLab 3y ago
Plant more trees! Don't underestimate the impact that planting even just one or two trees as an individual can have. It's also a lot of fun.
14.
by GravityLab 3y ago
1. The average tree's lifespan is a lot longer than 5 years. It's more like 300-400 years. I've not seen any sources saying that half of all planted trees are dead within 5 years. Even if that is true, 5 years is enough time
15.
by GravityLab 3y ago
https://logtrees.com/blog/the-simple-math-behind-planting-tr...
16.
by GravityLab 3y ago
There is already enough land available to capture enough CO2 to bring us down to natural levels if we plant those trees.
17.
by GravityLab 3y ago
There are also other uses for captured CO2. Better concrete, carbon nanotubes, etc.
18.
by GravityLab 3y ago
There is already enough land available for enough new native trees to capture more CO2 than is emitted into the atmosphere each year. This is before considering recovery of additional brownfield sites, becoming more efficient with industria
19.
by GravityLab 3y ago
Yes it can. The number of trees that could be planted are enough to capture airborne excess CO2. I'm glad there's technology via pipeline but it needs to mature more. We need better solutions than really long and disruptive pipeli
20.
by GravityLab 3y ago
The amount of trees that could be planted would capture more than the airborne excess carbon, which means they would be capturing previous excess too. Since we're really close to peak global CO2 emissions, this means the new trees woul
21.
by GravityLab 3y ago
This can be accomplished by planting trees. https://logtrees.com/blog/the-simple-math-behind-planting-tr...
22.
by GravityLab 3y ago
Congratulations Tesla! Really cool that you opened up the standard and it's now being adopted by others in the space. This is great.
23.
by GravityLab 3y ago
How has the size of the average home changed? In terms of square feet. I’m curious how that affects the price increase rate. We definitely need to build more housing, that’s for sure. I’m very hopeful that the huge investments into renewabl
24.
The simple math behind planting trees to end climate change(logtrees.com)
2 points by GravityLab 3y ago|0 comments
25.
by GravityLab 3y ago
They offset that much co2 each year. It’s not a one time thing. Over the average tree’s lifetime, it will store 25-45 kg of co2 per year. So it’s not just a single year of co2. It would be decades to hundreds of years. Throw in renewables,
26.
by GravityLab 3y ago
Amount of land available for reforestation as of 2019 is enough for 1.2 trillion native saplings. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aax0848 We could also set aside more land for reforestation as well. Fi
27.
by GravityLab 3y ago
Nah, leave shaming in the era of the Salem witch trials. We don't need that. Here's what we need: - global amount of co2 emissions per year https://www.statista.com/statistics/276629/global-co2-emissi ...
28.
by GravityLab 3y ago
Google these things: - global amount of co2 emissions per year https://www.statista.com/statistics/276629/global-co2-emissi... . - average co2 sequestered per tree - 25-45 kg depending on species (google for estima
29.
by GravityLab 3y ago
Trees would be replanted as they die, and the dead trees would be used for products. It's a constant process or cycle, not a one time thing. Also, by the time you plant enough trees to cover the entire landmass hundreds of years will h
30.
by GravityLab 3y ago
Source? I think you need to check your math. To sequester all of the co2 that gets emitted per year, you’d need about 1.6 trillion new trees. This assumes no other improvements in anything. This is because 37 billion metric tons (global co2

More ›