GlobalChange

6 ms·

1.
by GlobalChange 11y ago
The same way I cannot understand people that call themselves scientists of whatever been talking for the past years that CO2 can rise temperature, day or night! The anecdote is to be illustrative and not really done literally, naturally, bu
2.
by GlobalChange 11y ago
Since you mentioned the mythbusters, that episode is really wrong, though I really love it because it is the only one of its kind I know of that uses more than two gases. There is a real flaw there, which is the same in all those kind of ex
3.
by GlobalChange 11y ago
Great time machine from 1979: that says nothing and proves nothing. It is a real shame NASA is part of this UN (IPCC) joke. Ice and ocean levels will rise and fall as they have done throughout the geological history of the planet (of billio
4.
by GlobalChange 11y ago
Except when the prevailing "consensus" is wrong and has been deceitfully pushed forward to enslave everyone else. If one follows the argument for CO2 as culprit for global warming than our energy problems are solved. All we have t
5.
by GlobalChange 11y ago
If we don't even know about water, how could we possibly know anything about climate? http://nautil.us/issue/25/water/five-things-we-still-dont-kn... Moreover, if the premise is wrong, the conclusion can
6.
by GlobalChange 11y ago
When you guys say "more sex", does it means frequency (more times) or diversity (more people)? I understand that, in a way, more of the later also means more of the former, but I am just wondering which one is more important...
7.
by GlobalChange 11y ago
It is just amazing how the hole "grew" in 8 years, from 1979 to 1987. And then, there has been no change in 24 years, from 1987 to 2011, despite all that was done. More incredible, though would be to expect the anomaly to be elsew
8.
by GlobalChange 11y ago
Despite what I have said, I have actually been acquiring some "old" books (pre-Internet era, i.e., 1990 or older), even paying more on delivery fee than the book itself. lest to avoid history being rewritten, as someone, scarily,
9.
by GlobalChange 11y ago
"To date, many engineers, designers and user-interface experts have worked hard to make reading on an e-reader or tablet as close to reading on paper as possible." The approach is wrong. Most of us have not left the physical objec
10.
by GlobalChange 11y ago
I don't like paper. I have never liked it. Worse of all, I cannot never read at night, not paper. Never could, don't know why, eyes get red, tired, can't focus. Digital format, yes! When the story is good I almost go until da
11.
by GlobalChange 11y ago
Oh boy, here we go again. Seriously, I even thought this had some potential. Obviously, as stated in the article, "Earth has natural processes that absorb and hold onto heat to counteract that cooling effect". However, the author
12.
by GlobalChange 12y ago
http://www.scottevest.com/v3_store/Travel-Boxers.shtml
13.
by GlobalChange 12y ago
Well, them prove your claims, because 100 billion dollars spent in research in the past 20 years has proved nothing. The defenders of the AGW are the ones misinformed and lying. But as I said, it is very simple. All that is required is for
14.
by GlobalChange 12y ago
The ozone anomaly is still there. CFC gases has never really harmed it because those gases are heavier than the air, so it is a bit hard (not impossible, though) for them to get up there. The "hole" has always been over the poles
15.
by GlobalChange 12y ago
Science is not a democracy. There no such thing as science consensus, that is absolutely ridiculous and one more added to the fallacies around the issue. If all living things and the non-living things as well decide there is no gravity, we
16.
by GlobalChange 12y ago
Well, I stopped dead reading the article right on the first paragraph. I really could not believe. Ice on water does not raise it a millimeter whatsoever. Once again it is just stupid media writing the next Apocalypse just to sell papers or