Gerardo1

47 ms·

1.
by Gerardo1 10mo ago
Can I submit a request somewhere to have my data removed?
2.
by Gerardo1 10mo ago
Can users here submit an issue to have data associated with their account removed?
3.
by Gerardo1 10mo ago
because the people driving these products are disconnected and deeply unbalanced people
4.
by Gerardo1 10mo ago
Because the first couple major iterations looked like exponential improvements, and, because VC/private money is stupid, they assumed the trend must continue on the same curve. And because there's something in the human mind tha
5.
by Gerardo1 10mo ago
If you re--calibrate from any lofty idea of their motives to "get investor money now", this and other moves/announcements make more sense: anything that could look good to an investor. User count going up? Sure. New browser
6.
by Gerardo1 11mo ago
They would say that explicitly, that's the kind of marketing you can't buy.
7.
by Gerardo1 11mo ago
Did you, the company who built and sold this SaaS product, offer and agree to provide the service your customers paid you for? Did your product fail to render those services? Or do damage to the customer by operating outside of the boundari
8.
by Gerardo1 11mo ago
Exactly. I have said several times that the largest and most lucrative market for AI and agents in general is liability-laundering. It's just that you can't advertise that, or you ruin the service. And it already does work. See
9.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
It's not reasonable to claim inference is profitable when they've also never released those numbers. Also the price they charge for inference is not indicative of the price they're paying to provide inference. Also, at leas
10.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
Don't even need to get too fancy with it. Open AI has publicly committed to ~$500B in spending over the next several years (nevermind even they don't expect to actually bring that much revenue in) $500B/$100,000 is 5 million
11.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
...what were you doing before? That's bread and butter development work.
12.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
What is?
13.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
On the provider end, yes. Not on the consumer end. These are business customers buying a consumer-facing product.
14.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
That's...not hard. Pregnancy produces a whole slew of relatively predictable behavior changes. The whole point of recommendation systems is to aggregate data points across services.
15.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
What makes it seem like progress isn't flat?
16.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
1 Trillion US dollars? 1 trillion dollars is justified because people use chatGPT instead of google sometimes?
17.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
>No, that’s not what it means. That's fair but it's what I believe. ...see? Being consistent with stating your beliefs isn't the same as engaging with and about those beliefs. Advertising isn't conversation. Evangeli
18.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
> That's fair. But it's what I believe. That response suggests you aren't interested in discussion or conversation at all. It suggests that your purpose here is to advertise.
19.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
Your privacy policy and security page say you do not use any user data for training, it also says you don't store any user data. How do you square that with this comment? - https://tryapril.com/security - https:&#x2F
20.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
"The key difference isn’t the words — it’s how you structure the thinking process. By breaking down the task into numbered steps as we see in option B, you’re leveraging how transformer attention works: structured, sequential instructi
21.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
> I cannot reproduce this in any version of copilot? Because LLM-based service outputs are fundamentally not-reproduceable. We have no insight into any of the model settings, the context, what model is being run, etc.
22.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
> One fascinating aspect of LLMs is they make out-in-the-wild anecdotes instantly reproducible How? I would argue they do the exact opposite of that.
23.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
> because MCP brings _nothing_ to the table that I could not do with a "proper" API using completely standard tooling. This is what drives me crazy and has stopped my tinkering with MCP in its tracks: what is the point? It&#x
24.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
> By then comparable or even better models will easily run on edge. What are you basing that on?
25.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
From prices that were already losing services money. If you aren't making a profit, lowering prices is only about trying to capture market share before you're forced to increase prices to remain solvent.
26.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
> What about money? The hundreds of billions being sunk into AI. > You can't force me to want (or not want) someone's goods and services. What are you talking about? What does that have to do with anything in this conversa
27.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
> I want to live in a world with more options and freedom to choose And you think that AI will be beneficial to that want?
28.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
No you can start with actual money.
29.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
I don't love that this is the conversation and when these models bake-in these silly scenarios with training data, everyone goes "see, pelican bike! super human intelligence!" The point is never the pelican. The point is t
30.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
That's a rather crappy product naming scheme.

More ›