Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Geee
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
Geee
12d ago
It's a next-token computer. It computes the probabilities for the next token.
2.
▲
by
Geee
24d ago
I feel like claude.md is like Asimov's laws of robotics. Whatever you write there ends up eventually messing up everything.
3.
▲
by
Geee
1mo ago
I have had occasional tinnitus, and once it lasted for a few months and then went away. Sometimes it appears suddenly, and I've taken vitamin B12 and magnesium and it goes away in a few hours. Vitamin D might also help according to som
4.
▲
by
Geee
1mo ago
Yeah, these types of actuators are pretty interesting, but I've not seen anything super promising yet.
5.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
What innovations specifically?
6.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
I don't think electric motors + reduction gears can be improved much, unless I'm missing something. I hope someone invents something completely new.
7.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
G1 is a small robot designed for agility, and can't do much real work. That's why it uses lower reduction actuators with low sustained torques, and it'll overheat easily in continuous work. Many of the larger robots (Optimus,
8.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
I think the only real barriers are ethical. I'm pretty sure we'll figure out to do a completely synthetic biological robots without any kind of biological brain in the next 10-20 years, and they don't even have to resemble an
9.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
I think they're doing it the other way around, i.e. growing a biological brain for the AI, which would then be used in a robot.
10.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
Well, a giraffe could do jobs where you need to reach high, such as replacing a lightbulb. Sure, I'm half-joking. Asimo used BLDC motors with strain-wave gearing, which is pretty much standard today on high-end humanoid robots. The onl
11.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
I've kind of given up on humanoid robotics, because of how bad the actuators are. There has been no innovation in robotic actuators since Honda's Asimo. There's just no way that someone wants a 80kg wobbling tin can in their
12.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
It is still about space. AI and space computers are just the vehicle to fund it all.
13.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
You wouldn't distill a car.
14.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
how is babby formed? how girl get pragnent?
15.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
I don't think this is true at all. I've been experimenting with a physical sky / atmosphere modeling, and it really seems that the most physically accurate sky is the most beautiful. I think this applies more generally to all
16.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
I read tutorials, but the UI was also more intuitive / discoverable than Blender. It's been over 20 years since I last used it though, but I remember it being much easier to use than Blender today. I could model, texture and anima
17.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
I used to use 3ds Max and I find the Blender's UI really terrible after years of occasional use. It's very unintuitive and you'll have to learn everything from tutorials / reading Blender forums. It seems to have many an
18.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
Does it support WebGPU?
19.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
Isn't it assumed that the AI agent is allowed to read your files in the directory you launch the harness? Most agents read your code on the first prompt, including any secrets you have there, which you shouldn't have. Also the .en
20.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
I was using Supercharged, thought that was better. :) Now I got it tuned up to 3767 kW / 5051 hp, that must be the maximum.
21.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
On the dyno panel you see "pk" which is peak power. If you don't see the dyno panel on the right, you'll have to scroll down to see it.
22.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
3638 kW / 4878 hp is the most powerful engine I could build with this.
23.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
Addiction is exactly what laws should be fighting, be it social media, drugs, or something else. In a free market, people should be free to choose where they spend their time and money, but people aren't free if they're addicted.
24.
▲
by
Geee
2mo ago
They only cut the funding where they couldn't show where the money is going, e.g. the money never helped anyone, but went somewhere else. Obviously whoever got the money is claiming that a lot of people are dying. The Lancet's mod
25.
▲
by
Geee
3mo ago
The article is about mortality related to ambient temperatures. People have always died from ambient temperatures, that's why we have clothes and homes.
26.
▲
by
Geee
3mo ago
Well, to me it reads as "climate change causes people to die", although the opposite is true and their own results show that. It's obvious because people die overwhelmingly from cold compared to heat.
27.
▲
by
Geee
3mo ago
It seems like they use obscure language (non-optimal, excess) on purpose to try to somehow connect global warming into the obvious fact that a lot of people die in cold temperatures if they don't have a warm shelter, and sometimes peop
28.
▲
by
Geee
3mo ago
Very cool research. They just injected mice with 45 different bacterial strains, and then isolated and cultivated the ones that had the best performance. It seems that it might be quite easy to cultivate these strains to target different tu
29.
▲
by
Geee
3mo ago
Horrible idea. It's a step towards single-tier banking like in the Soviet Union, where the central bank takes the role of commercial banks. There's no other reason for this than surveillance and control. There already exists multi
30.
▲
by
Geee
3mo ago
Are we finally re-entering the Atomic Age? It seems that the Soviets extended the Oil Age by about 40 years, by blowing up the Chernobyl plant in 1986.
More ›