Gander5739

5 ms·

1.
Article wasn't written by an AI. So what if it had been(economist.com)
1 points by Gander5739 2d ago|2 comments
2.
by Gander5739 4d ago
Android allows apps to read from the clipboard at will, though it does show a toast. GrapheneOS, I believe, asks for permission first.
3.
by Gander5739 4d ago
https://archive.ph/3Ma73
4.
The truth and the lies about Islam in Europe(economist.com)
4 points by Gander5739 4d ago|3 comments
5.
by Gander5739 5d ago
> "Science project demonstrates new way to kill $PATHOGEN": It turns out killing things in a petri dish is really easy. https://xkcd.com/1217/
6.
by Gander5739 6d ago
Sounds more like implausible deniability.
7.
by Gander5739 6d ago
Wall, you can't tell if they're ignoring it, but it's fairly easy to show they're manipulating it. So a cut-and-dry demonstration is worse than a strong suspicion.
8.
by Gander5739 7d ago
I don't think that follows. You can doomscroll at any screen size, small or big. If they don't fit in your pockets, it's probably harder to doomscroll on the phone, not easier.
9.
by Gander5739 9d ago
Isn't that somewhat pointless if you don't also regularly rotate your ip address?
10.
How work makes families more equal(economist.com)
1 points by Gander5739 9d ago|0 comments
11.
by Gander5739 9d ago
On the other hand, I use Thumb Key ( https://github.com/dessalines/thumb-key ) and think Unexpected Keyboard doesn't go far enough.
12.
by Gander5739 11d ago
Epicaricacy in English.
13.
by Gander5739 11d ago
> There's not even an author on this article. The Economist has anonymous writers for almost every article.
14.
by Gander5739 11d ago
> This reads more like an opinion piece than reporting. That is the style of articles (interpretive analysis) that The Economist does.
15.
by Gander5739 11d ago
Well, you need an account to search.
16.
by Gander5739 11d ago
They can, but for this specifc test, they don't. It's a oneshot with no feedback.
17.
by Gander5739 11d ago
Rutracker's a good one.
18.
by Gander5739 12d ago
Doesn't that somewhat miss the point? The models can't see and check their work, for instance.
19.
by Gander5739 14d ago
Forgive my lack of familiarity with racial slurs, but what part of that resembles a racial slur?
20.
by Gander5739 14d ago
You can use a nitter instance: https://x.n0g.xyz/ChrisCroy/status/2094867317163540937
21.
by Gander5739 14d ago
Relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/1573/
22.
by Gander5739 14d ago
https://youtu.be/ZVYqB0uTKlE (Yes, Prime Minister)
23.
by Gander5739 15d ago
Maybe not in practice, but in theory, it works. I don't think there's a better way of handling this without relying on some centralised authority (Google) to validate the authorship of an app, which is hardly desirable.
24.
by Gander5739 15d ago
Android apps are signed. Can't you verify the signature?
25.
by Gander5739 15d ago
I wish. It's not like the (former) openness of Android pulled iOS any more open; in fact, it feels more like the reverse.
26.
by Gander5739 15d ago
This is on Android, though.
27.
by Gander5739 16d ago
Have you heard of Soulseek? It's an active p2p music sharing platform.
28.
by Gander5739 18d ago
There's also an earlier xkcd on this theme: https://xkcd.com/3073/
29.
by Gander5739 19d ago
In this case the feature wasn't available on the mobile app, either.
30.
by Gander5739 21d ago
Relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/2236/

More ›