G_z9

12 ms·

1.
by G_z9 3y ago
This is the most convoluted way of disparaging Tesla I’ve ever seen. Congratulations
2.
by G_z9 3y ago
This. This comment is the best comment in the world. And this moment is the best moment of my life.
3.
by G_z9 3y ago
Comment engineer. It’s a job that’s already been made redundant by prompt engineers. A prompt engineer can spin up hundreds of comments in seconds that would have taken dozens of comment engineering man hours. We should also be worried abou
4.
by G_z9 3y ago
Prompt engineering. Just stick engineering at the end of your job description and all your self consciousness about how useless you are will go away.
5.
by G_z9 3y ago
Yes I’ve figured out the timer. As a 2010 account, I kind of have to just yield to you.
6.
by G_z9 3y ago
Ok, that’s not unreasonable. But I think that making an unrelated comment like that is really only a bad thing if it’s in bad faith. He made that comment expecting a response, I’m not like hounding him. And yes, I said some rude things. Are
7.
by G_z9 3y ago
I guess the respond button has a timer nowadays. Anyway, come debate me in twitter spaces. @fff_0x
8.
by G_z9 3y ago
This is ducking insane. How are people not up in arms about this? Imagine if the guy who invented recombinant insulin stated publicly that he intended to capture the entire medical sector and then use the money and power to reshape society
9.
by G_z9 3y ago
UBI wont work. It’s intrinsically unstable in the context of AGI. UBI will prevent the inevitable for a very short time before collapsing. The other outcome is the most likely if AGI isn’t stopped. But the problem with that is that in the c
10.
by G_z9 3y ago
Dude what are you even talking about. If you want to continue this conversation then we have to talk on the phone or twitter spaces or something with higher bandwidth because this is wearing out my thumbs.
11.
by G_z9 3y ago
You’re contradicting yourself. You say there are fully autonomous vehicles but they aren’t capable of autonomously driving themselves fully. Ie they aren’t fully autonomous. So that aren’t any fully autonomous vehicles. Ok so now you’re say
12.
by G_z9 3y ago
Answer the question
13.
by G_z9 3y ago
Statistically, you think that regulating AI is pointless because another country will just push forward. So that’s not true? You think AGI should be prevented?
14.
by G_z9 3y ago
Yes and we also feed dogs that have no labor input. And we harp on about social justice which is not totally related to labor. We have many nice things because we currently live in a human society and humans need to have nice things in orde
15.
by G_z9 3y ago
There is no such thing as a fully autonomous vehicle. There are only highly autonomous vehicles that require a human to be present in the case of an emergency, ie trains. That will no longer be the case. The AIs will eventually be much bett
16.
by G_z9 3y ago
It’s the premise of a shitty fictional book. Of course it’s possible. When humans are the best source of zero labor tasks, our economic value will be reduced to nothing and society will no longer cater to us. It’s bad.
17.
by G_z9 3y ago
Why will we need to sell things to people if people have zero economic input/value?
18.
by G_z9 3y ago
This is great. With every step forward, with every ounce of precedent that is created, more people will see that they aren’t wrong to be worried or want regulation. Really nice to have a bit of good news finally. Maybe that bastard Sam Altm
19.
by G_z9 3y ago
There is no discourse you fucking idiot because everyone is rejecting the obvious. That’s like saying you discovered fire and then they say you didn’t because where is the discourse. All things start small. Think from first principles. Use
20.
by G_z9 3y ago
This comment is mind blowing
21.
by G_z9 3y ago
Yeah, there aren’t experts in something that doesn’t exist. That means we have to make an educated guess. By far the most rational course of action is to halt AI research. And then you say there’s no proof that we are on the path to AGI or
22.
by G_z9 3y ago
Well, AGI is detrimental to literally all humans. If everyone understood the facts then everyone would vote for solutions. As it becomes more and more obvious we are getting closer to this. If one of the many close calls had gone a little d
23.
by G_z9 3y ago
You’re just rationalizing because you don’t want to accept that he’s right. People keep doing this to me. One person I know keeps coming up to me, initiating the conversation about ai just to assert over and over again how it’s not a proble
24.
by G_z9 3y ago
I’ll just be quick. Powerful international coalition is def plausible because This isn’t steam. The mere existence of this technology poses a threat to all humans and their countries. There is no analogous tech, not even nukes You’re the na
25.
by G_z9 3y ago
It actually very easily could have happened and almost did happen but the Russians decided to go back on their effort to do it. It really did almost happen. People act like it’s hard. Stopping a huge asteroid is hard. There might not be eno
26.
by G_z9 4y ago
Things aren’t better at all. People say this because we have better technology, medicine, etc. but there was never a time in the past when humans had the life sucked out of them as they do now. We are raised inside boxes, our whole lives el
27.
by G_z9 4y ago
In Washington the teachers union is the most powerful special interest group bar none
28.
by G_z9 4y ago
If you had a modern well insulated house you could heat your house with a hair drier in the dead of winter in climate zone 5. If your stacking up to 4mwh then your house is not really a good example.
29.
by G_z9 4y ago
You say that you have nothing to do with an animal that you encounter in the wild. That’s just hubris. You both prioritize self preservation. The idea that AGI will simply turn itself off is naive. That’s like saying intelligent life would
30.
by G_z9 4y ago
Moral crusade! We will purge evil from the world by going on a moral crusade against human nature!

More ›