G3P

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by G3P 15y ago

   Max Gerson believed that cancer was a result of an individual lacking production of "cancer digesting" pancreatic enzymes - aka he was a complete quack. As a medical student dedicating the overwhelming majority of my spare time fighting con
2. 2.▲
   by G3P 15y ago

   No, it means that he invented treatment regiments that weren't supported by any scientific evidence, and did so while failing to document or properly control any of his "studies," some of which were repeated and found to be not only no bett
3. 3.▲
   by G3P 15y ago

   Zach, I was responding to rvann's statement, not yours. The "reply" button wasn't available on his for some reason.
4. 4.▲
   by G3P 15y ago

   It's a reversal. Cure implies that a disease cannot, under most circumstances, come back due to the treatment regimen (whether that be diet, drugs, radiation, etc...). The reason it's a reversal and not a cure is that if a patient were to "
5. 5.▲
   by G3P 15y ago

   There are instances in which chemotherapy is the only option, as advised by sound evidence-based medical research, just as there are instances in which diet is a completely acceptable treatment, and those instances must abide by the same st
6. 6.▲
   by G3P 15y ago

   I hate to rain on your parade, I do... But, you simply couldn't be further from the truth. Diet can only be considered a "cure" in an extremely small subset of all disease; and, furthermore, the word "cure" is practically never used to desc