FrontAid

6 ms·

1.
by FrontAid 8mo ago
There are many options, each with their own pros and cons. Also, you may or may not like their default styling and/or styling options. There is no one size fits all. Having said that, we maintain an incomplete list of popular UI librar
2.
by FrontAid 2y ago
Dashboards, tabs, trees, ... usually require at least some JavaScript to work properly. For some components, you may be able to use hacks around that. But I would generally not recommend that outside of experimentation. So a pure CSS framew
3.
by FrontAid 2y ago
> specifically UI libraries There are certainly more UI libraries available for React than any other framework [1]. But do you think that these are also clearly better? What would be your go to framework for React? To me, it seems that t
4.
by FrontAid 3y ago
Hi there. We create FrontAid CMS as another headless, Git-based CMS like Tina. And we integrate directly with Uploadcare. You can find more information here: - https://frontaid.io/ - https://frontaid.io/docs
5.
by FrontAid 3y ago
Yes, that's it. Judging from the screencast, I will continue using lazygit for that though. Not a fan of all the clicking. Hopefully there will be a keystroke available for it.
6.
by FrontAid 3y ago
I don't know Rider, but I assume this is a limitation in all of their IDEs. Yes, you can commit only certain changes within a file. But you can only do that based on whole chunks. For example, if you add two new lines at the end of an
7.
by FrontAid 3y ago
I use IntelliJ IDEA and often rely on their own Git functionality. But it cannot stage specific lines, only whole chunks [1]. For that, I've been using lazygit for a couple of months now. I like its simple UI and that it makes staging
8.
by FrontAid 3y ago
Ask HN: How did you increase your UX skills? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32147968
9.
by FrontAid 4y ago
Can you make an example of features/styles that have been replaced? I'm not really sure what you mean by that.
10.
by FrontAid 4y ago
No. The former imports all the exports, and the latter imports the default export only. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Refe... https://developer.mozilla.org/e
11.
by FrontAid 4y ago
More or less what CrowdView does. - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34507965 - https://crowdview.ai/
12.
by FrontAid 4y ago
> Similar to the Do Not Track header, a Accept Cookies header? Do not track can do that, it has three possible values. 0: The user prefers to allow tracking on the target site. 1: The user prefers not to be tracked on the targe
13.
by FrontAid 4y ago
Same in Switzerland. There is even a remake/adaption in Swiss German https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNJrprqPVns but I like the original way more.
14.
by FrontAid 4y ago
> I want access the RSS of NYT, where I find it? https://www.nytimes.com/rss
15.
by FrontAid 4y ago
Unfortunately, almost all of them are terrible for accessibility. Most of them cannot be focussed by keyboard. And even more do not have a focus styling. I did not check their code, but that alone does not make a good impression. Please c
16.
by FrontAid 4y ago
Very interesting! I had a look at your "RFC 001: Core Architecture" but one question remains. You mentioned "git as the backend". As far as I understand, you don't use the word "backend" in the classic fro
17.
by FrontAid 4y ago
If you are considering switching to a (different) date library, I would suggest to hold off. ECMAScript is about to introduce a native date and time API that is much better than the current Date functionality. It may also make the need for
18.
by FrontAid 4y ago
The article already explains that thoroughly.
19.
by FrontAid 4y ago
Another similar gotcha is that the global-scoped `name` variable must be a string. See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/name for details. var name = true; typeof n
20.
by FrontAid 4y ago
Au contraire. That is good question. Everything in the snippet except the font-size should also work with the body selector. The font-size is an exception here as it defines the root font size that the `rem` unit is based on. And that has t
21.
by FrontAid 4y ago
> I wonder if everyone has a different optimum here based on different eyesight, screen size, and usage patterns. I always have a slightly different zoom on every website I visit. I would think so. And because of that, accessibility is a
22.
by FrontAid 4y ago
I think this does not work well for mobile devices. Spacing and the font size is too large. Hence, a lot of screen space is wasted and the user has to scroll more. Larger font sizes on mobile are usually not a good idea as the device tends
23.
by FrontAid 4y ago
The changes in this edition of ECMAScript can be found at the end of this table (everything with "2022" in the last column): https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/main/finished-proposa... The
24.
ECMAScript 2022 approved(ecma-international.org)
3 points by FrontAid 4y ago|1 comments
25.
by FrontAid 5y ago
You can have a look at https://github.com/troxler/awesome-css-frameworks which is an extensive collection of CSS frameworks. Check out the "Class-less" section for similar projects. There is also an open PR t
26.
by FrontAid 5y ago
This issue currently blocks shipping Temporal support without a flag : https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/1450
27.
by FrontAid 5y ago
Not sure where you got that quote from, but FLWOR is not something JSONiq invented. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLWOR - https://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-30/#id-flwor-expressions FLWOR is pron
28.
by FrontAid 5y ago
I did see the commits, but the last release was almost three years ago. That is not necessarily bad. I was just wondering whether it still works well or there are any quirks.
29.
by FrontAid 5y ago
It does not really seem to be maintained anymore. Is there any downside because of that?
30.
by FrontAid 5y ago
neogit is "magit for neovim". It is written in Lua. Did you already know the answer to your question? ;) https://github.com/TimUntersberger/neogit Similar Git tooling can be found in https://github

More ›