FourOnTheFloor

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by FourOnTheFloor 2y ago

   Thanks for answering his question.
2. 2.▲
   by FourOnTheFloor 2y ago

   OK, I will admit the "unexpected item" nonsense has diminished... only to be replaced by the "calling for assistance" out of nowhere.
3. 3.▲
   by FourOnTheFloor 2y ago

   "Unidentified item in driving area. Calling police."
4. 4.▲
   by FourOnTheFloor 2y ago

   And it almost always DOES go wrong. Seriously 75% of the time when I'm done scanning and I press "pay now," it inexplicably says "calling for assistance" and refuses to do anything until an employee comes over. WHY?
5. 5.▲
   by FourOnTheFloor 2y ago

   But this was an obvious sham and a fraud that couldn't scale. I don't think its demise is sad at all. What's sad is putting cashiers out of work, and even worse is replacing them with outrageously piss-poor alternatives. Self
6. 6.▲
   by FourOnTheFloor 2y ago

   Yep, that's pretty much it. Reminds me that one of the single biggest regressions in GUIs over the last couple of decades is: The knowledge of how to make a proper tabbed dialog has been lost to many.
7. 7.▲
   by FourOnTheFloor 2y ago

   Thanks. Never having seen a description in this language, I wouldn't know that the above syntax designated one; it looks like a comment. I also can't find any similar strings in any of the samples in the drop-down list.
8. 8.▲
   by FourOnTheFloor 2y ago

   Ha, true. They actually did have a way to invert the whole UI... but it also inverted photo images on the screen. poundAppleAttentionToDetail
9. 9.▲
   by FourOnTheFloor 2y ago

   Shitfest indeed. "back when you could configure stuff and have it not break early the following week" Exactly, but this was true on every GUI EXCEPT the vaunted Mac. For what, two decades, you could set up your own system-wide col
10. 10.▲
    by FourOnTheFloor 2y ago

    Thanks. I don't see any in that playground though. Which document are they in? I think I looked in all the ones in the drop-down.
11. 11.▲
    by FourOnTheFloor 2y ago

    How do they make it work on frequencies beyond its range? The diagram puts its range below the aviation band.
12. 12.▲
    by FourOnTheFloor 2y ago

    Hadn't heard of that, thanks. Does TypeSpec have description fields? I don't think I've seen any in the examples.
13. 13.▲
    by FourOnTheFloor 2y ago

    Cool, thanks for the reply!
14. 14.▲
    by FourOnTheFloor 2y ago

    Targeting OpenAPI 3.0 is a bad idea. It wasn't until 3.1 that it became truly useful, if only because it fixed one glaring blunder: Pre-3.1, you inexplicably couldn't provide a description along with a $ref. This defeats one of th