Fizz43

5 ms·

1.
by Fizz43 4d ago
You can make the same argument about China. They are producing so much Co2 its pushed the world past the point of no return. All the climate change policy in the world cant change anything because china took so long to begin addressing the
2.
by Fizz43 7d ago
this guy already has clout and tenure
3.
by Fizz43 13d ago
In NZ we call it the walking school bus.
4.
by Fizz43 13d ago
They are crime hotspots
5.
by Fizz43 13d ago
Its AGI when it can fit years of information in the context window.
6.
by Fizz43 15d ago
>When Google implement an anti-user feature, Mozilla have to begrudgingly implement it Why would ladybird be any different? The developer is not anti corporate and is closer ideologically to Google than Mozilla.
7.
by Fizz43 15d ago
Passing tests and has abysmal performance on basic web features. Not to mention how many security issues are present. Its unserious to suggest it as an alternative at this stage. It make people think they dont have to support firefox becaus
8.
by Fizz43 15d ago
Nothing Firefox has done is remotely comparable to chrome.
9.
by Fizz43 15d ago
I treat firefox the same way I treat politics. If I am around people I know understand the importance of firefox and are commited to using it then we can talk about its problems. If I am around anyone else I wont say a bad word about firefo
10.
by Fizz43 15d ago
Whats the point of paying for this report if they cant even be bothered to do it. Mistakes in a 425,000 government report are unacceptable. This is what we are basing years of policy off it needs to be rock solid information. In a sane worl
11.
by Fizz43 17d ago
That's a cool solution, im lazy and would just put a little sign asking to knock.
12.
by Fizz43 27d ago
Because its not clear if "we" refers to isreal or the US or Gaza
13.
by Fizz43 29d ago
I'm not sure what "we" or "our" is referring to here.
14.
by Fizz43 1mo ago
Not true. It will only happen if they lose the information war. During 2023/2024 Iran did this exact same thing flooding the internet and no one hates them infact it worked and people link and share and boost their articles.
15.
by Fizz43 1mo ago
"but that’s socialism" is part of a socialist campaign to rebrand the more palatable liberal ideas as their own so they can get into power and enact their actual policies.
16.
by Fizz43 1mo ago
Its kind of insulting how many people look at other industries and think they can "solve" the problems with their simple solution. As if the people in these industries havent been thinking about this problem for decades.
17.
by Fizz43 1mo ago
Firefox needs word of mouth to grow. It needs tech people and firefox users to talk positively about it. But all they do is nitpick and spread baseless FUD its no wonder users drop. I always tell people firefox is amazing because it really
18.
by Fizz43 1mo ago
none of this is remotely socialist
19.
by Fizz43 2mo ago
The masses wont be amplifying their own voices they will just be getting more propaganda.
20.
by Fizz43 2mo ago
They are going to do all this work and then adopt the wrong tech or try and make money in the wrong way and end up with their only viable userbase constantly eternally talking them.
21.
by Fizz43 2mo ago
>Trump Media may soon sell early access to the president’s Truth Social posts. Think about what this means. This is how the president announces war; every embassy on earth has to maintain a Truth Social account just to stay informed of A
22.
by Fizz43 2mo ago
>So, instead of defining a bot primarily as “AI” or not, our updated approach to classification will ask deeper questions about bot or agent behavior: What are they doing on my site? What are they storing? And how will they reshare my co
23.
by Fizz43 2mo ago
It pushed it to a place with no search-ability and significantly less users. It worked to effectively suppress the project. I say that as someone who uses Radicle and likes the project (I am hoping node search comes soon).
24.
by Fizz43 2mo ago
Containers are really awesome and I thought Mozilla would jump on them. But nothing ever happened they are barebones and there is so much more that could be added. The only thing we have is taking them from an extension to in-browser which
25.
by Fizz43 2mo ago
It wont. It will never get better. I doubt the Isreali's will ever be anything but extremely hostile.
26.
by Fizz43 2mo ago
and cost more than a maid
27.
by Fizz43 2mo ago
yes
28.
by Fizz43 2mo ago
6.6% of total government expenditure is significantly smaller than you tried to make it out to be. What are you trying to show with a per captia comparison its not paid as a % of the persons salary the person make 66k is probably paying les
29.
by Fizz43 2mo ago
445 billion is tiny on the budget of the US government. your stat showing the increase in spending from 2001 to 2008 does nothing to support your narrative. Defense spending goes up after you're attacked wow shocking. Money is spent on
30.
by Fizz43 2mo ago
They do write weapons companies direct checks through research and procurement contracts. No one cares because the amount is tiny. Its not this huge market being pumped like slopulists pretend it is. Politicians dont need to invest in defen

More ›