Fidelix

6 ms·

1.
by Fidelix 1mo ago
Did you even check what hash they are using?
2.
by Fidelix 1mo ago
No need to announce
3.
by Fidelix 1mo ago
Why these animations in the github README? why? It just made understanding anything more difficult
4.
by Fidelix 1mo ago
That's fine, then there is no need to lie like you did.
5.
by Fidelix 1mo ago
Yes, repost
6.
by Fidelix 6mo ago
Can you clarify? I tested a few and they are rubbish and don't have the same features.
7.
by Fidelix 7mo ago
MacOS only. May this help you skip a click.
8.
by Fidelix 9mo ago
Why would one need to self-host TBs of content with Usenet? That makes no sense. It's also a lot less prone to failures than debrid services, especially with old content.
9.
by Fidelix 11mo ago
Freerdp (which this project and every other similar one depends on) is 100% broken on wayland for this use case. I'm not going back to X11.
10.
by Fidelix 1y ago
It would probably beneficial for you to distinguish an is from an ought. The OP was descriptive, not prescriptive.
11.
by Fidelix 1y ago
Unbelievable... Good job mate. Can't wait until one day this gets into Moonlight or something like it.
12.
by Fidelix 1y ago
"It's a hot mess" - someone who knows absolutely nothing about what they're talking about. Typical HN comment about php.
13.
by Fidelix 1y ago
Try Niri or PaperWM. A scrolling window manager.
14.
by Fidelix 1y ago
They are upvoting because they hate Elon Musk. It's not that deep.
15.
by Fidelix 1y ago
Yes. Every single transaction is open for the government to inspect. There is zero privacy in pix in relation to government surveillance.
16.
by Fidelix 1y ago
According to Wikipedia, RDP = June 16, 1998 SSH = 1995. OpenSSH = 1999
17.
by Fidelix 1y ago
Any links to share? I don't care about security for my use case.
18.
by Fidelix 1y ago
yes, that. it was a typo. Thanks
19.
by Fidelix 1y ago
Because people that make an effort of announcing these things are all about virtual signaling. Nothing they do ever has real substance to it.
20.
by Fidelix 2y ago
> pushing everyone else to provide for themselves what they had previously got from the US Did you write this, review it, then post it as if that's a bad thing? wow edit: grammar
21.
by Fidelix 2y ago
> The moment I made up my mind about this was reading the following words written by a maintainer within the kernel community: > "we are the thin blue line" > This isn't okay. This isn't creating an inclusive en
22.
by Fidelix 2y ago
No. It's a disaster. The poor pay for the richest to go to public universities. See Brazil. There are more low-income people in private universities (with private or private/public loans) than in public universities.
23.
by Fidelix 2y ago
Consider that his position might be more profound than you considered it to be. Mine is. It's about incentives. Now you can take it from there, and at least in my interpretation the rest of your rebuttal falls apart. There is absolutel
24.
by Fidelix 2y ago
Yeah, and the EFF is in no way biased. at all.
25.
by Fidelix 2y ago
That's a fair point, but scaling it vertically can take you very far in my experience.
26.
by Fidelix 2y ago
That's different from "killing" the product / technology, which is what Google does.
27.
by Fidelix 2y ago
What a silly notion. You're not affiliated to a company merely because you are their customer.
28.
by Fidelix 2y ago
I don't think that word "conservatism" mean what you think
29.
by Fidelix 2y ago
Not true at all. No red paint in it. This has been conclusively, scientifically debunked multiple times.
30.
by Fidelix 2y ago
UPnP is useless with CGNAT (Carrier Grade NAT), which is what the op is talking about. There are other ways to get seeding working, though, including IPV6, which is gaining adoption, so I don't agree with the OP.

More ›