Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
FeeTinesAMady
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
> That doesn't work in real life. In order to know what level of force is necessary, one has to have a perfect knowledge of the opposition. That isn't possible, so you always respond with more force than you think in necessary
2.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
> watching a frustrated care troll twist What are you talking about? > Negotiating with irrational actors is risky They never even tried it. I'll make this simple. The only justification for the fire bombings and nuclear bombin
3.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
Yes, they do. See my comment near the top. Nothing disrespectful about it, just opinionated.
4.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
So the US killed 500,000 civilians because they didn't weren't willing to negotiate, and you think that that's funny. That says a lot about you.
5.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
Mind you, there's a downside to that. An FBI that can infiltrate and dismantle the KKK at will can do the same to any legitimate movement for change, like Occupy, etc.
6.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
Such as the US guaranteeing that the Emperor stays in power, which they allowed after the war anyway? http://www.spectacle.org/696/long.html And what is that smile for, anyway? Do you think this is funny?
7.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
Except that Japan repeatedly tried to make peace before the atomic bombings, and if the US hadn't been so determined that it be an unconditional surrender and been willing to negotiate, they could have ended the war before that, withou
8.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
What else can you assume, though? You have no information at that point.
9.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
LibreSSL is doing the first part of that. When it's in a useable state, switch to that and leave OpenSSL in the past.
10.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
What did they change, if you don't mind my asking? I've been using it for two seasons now, and haven't noticed anything too annoying, although I have been in public leagues only so far.
11.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
> There is no tactic Actually, I've reconsidered. You admit to the realpolitik of the TPP and you admit to how it is try to sabotage China's self-governance (re. intellectual property, which they are MUCH better off without). B
12.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
You are using the tactic of trying to seem just like us and agreeing with us that it's bad: "... it comes with certain trojan horses ... such as requirements mentioned in the article for internet service providers to filter and mo
13.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
But Github here is in the position where they are the only external party that could do something about this, because the code is hosted on their site. > ... Im sure many people don't want GitHub to start arbitrarily banning project
14.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
> ... I don't believe I need to be punished ... It's not about punishment. It's not: oh, you did something bad, you need to be punished for it. It's that it shouldn't be easy , and doing it in person makes sure
15.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
Downvotes? Really? Github could make a stand here and disallow licenses that evil and self-serving. With this license, anybody who even uses this software can't challenge any patents of Facebook's. If Github said no, this is wrong
16.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
Github would earn a lot of respect if they simply disallowed that sort of license for anything hosted with them.
17.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
The point that all your detractors seem to be getting at, that you won't let yourself understand, is that you should do it in person so that it is hard for you to do it. You will never be able to pretend that you aren't doing a
18.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
freedom123, fyi, your comments are showing up as dead.
19.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
It seems pretty counterproductive for Google to penalize the linked-to website for this, because they don't necessarily have any control over the links. This means that now a good strategy would be to make a bunch of spam links to your
20.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
It's entirely possible that a lot of people don't know what -CURRENT really means if they're new to FreeBSD. They could be on 10.1 and think that that means that they're on -CURRENT, and thus affected by this bug, but th
21.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
Right, because I used his real name.
22.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
Not even close. Read the other comments in this subthread.
23.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
> It might be. But we don't actually know how HN's voting algorithm works (secret sauce), and we do know for a fact that the HN staff will manipulate vote gravity in order to make the content of a thread more accurately reflect
24.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
Any sort of praise or tacit approval for the NSA reduces people's anger towards them. Any reduction of anger towards them helps breed complacency. This is why they would make a post like this at all. People need to be mad at them in or
25.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
What kind of evidence do you expect to find? I'm not attacking someone just because of his opinion, nor am I advocating that. I'm calling out a shill. Look at the facts. One post before today. A pro-NSA post that reads like rhet
26.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
You think I am accusing him of being a shill because I don't agree with him? Have you seen his posting history? That's pretty much the definition of a shill who isn't trying very hard. Much more dangerous are the ones who act
27.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
But the pro-government shills ARE here. That's not paranoia, that's fact, unless you think they'd target Reddit only for some reason, which makes no sense. So why can't we talk about them? If we don't face up to the
28.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
> the United States post WWII is downright benevolent You must be joking. Read what ex-CIA agent John Stockwell has to say about that: http://www.serendipity.li/cia/stock1.html The CIA went into foreign countries an
29.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
Not right. If the US was peaceful, there wouldn't be much of an argument for developing nuclear weapons, but the US is the most aggressive nation in the world, and nuclear weapons are the only thing that give them pause. The actions of
30.
▲
by
FeeTinesAMady
12y ago
This statement is the most upvoted piece of propaganda I've ever seen on Hacker News. I think the shills that Greenwald told us all about are all over HN too. There's no point in praising anything the NSA does unless you are perfe
More ›