FalseNutrition

6 ms·

1.
by FalseNutrition 1y ago
It wasn't sarcastic, I tried to make people read it, and see that it's nonsense. edit: I don't know why you reply by editing your comment like this. I'm not proposing any conspiracy theory, I'm claiming that lead to
2.
by FalseNutrition 1y ago
I didn't ghost you, BTW, my previous account got downvoted so heavily that my posts stopped being visible.
3.
by FalseNutrition 1y ago
I wrote a longer comment, but it got flagged, so I deleted it, and wrote that one. My position is that lead toxicity seems to be a conspiracy theory, rather than a real thing, the evidence for it is bizarre, and doesn't make any sense,
4.
by FalseNutrition 1y ago
What method was used to infer the natural rates?
5.
by FalseNutrition 1y ago
Not only that. Life accumulated those over the eons, as the rocks eroded, the useful metals got saved by life, and the rest was washed down. So the natural levels are way higher. Life is good at hoarding these "heavy metals". Peop
6.
by FalseNutrition 1y ago
It doesn't work. The photos don't load.
7.
by FalseNutrition 1y ago
Most of the people in the photos seem be ordinary, working class people. Even buddhist monks, who swore to live in poverty, celibacy and to avoid food that was too flavorful. It isn't like we don't have records of ordinary people,
8.
by FalseNutrition 1y ago
I'm not buying this. All these claims rely on some nebulous "poor people" who were kept hidden away somewhere. There is no good reason to doubt that these photos show regular people, and the buildings they lived in.
9.
by FalseNutrition 1y ago
They were dyed, rather than painted. The details come from the photograph.
10.
by FalseNutrition 1y ago
That's a very brave statement. The industry has moved abroad, we have never been less healthy, and it's still getting worse.
11.
by FalseNutrition 1y ago
The rich are not your problem. It's the guy who can't work any cheaper because he has to keep paying his mortgage who causes this deadlock.
12.
by FalseNutrition 1y ago
The problem isn't abundance, or the lack of thereof. The problem is capitalism. Capitalism creates an excess, but it gets stuck with: 1. People who have money, who already have anything they want, so they won't buy more. 2. People
13.
by FalseNutrition 1y ago
To be honest, I'm not sure if I understand what is actually claimed here (it seems that they trained the model on their own, and claim that the problem is in the dataset?) but isn't the more sensible explanation that human doctors
14.
by FalseNutrition 1y ago
The excess isn't a problem on its own, but it prevents people from making money. You get stuck with people who have money, who have everything they want, and people who don't have money who can't make any, becauae there is al
15.
by FalseNutrition 1y ago
We have the exactly opposite problem. We can produce so much that there are no markets to consume it all. There is an excess and we get assaulted by ads to consume some of it. Shortages are almost absent.