EnergyAmy

5 ms·

31.
by EnergyAmy 8mo ago
You can do that with an extension, I do a 2x2 workspace. Although extensions can be problematic and break between versions, I haven't had any issues with this one.
32.
by EnergyAmy 8mo ago
Part of his arc was posting about himself on Reddit using sockpuppets, calling himself a genius: https://comicsalliance.com/scott-adams-plannedchaos-sockpupp...
33.
by EnergyAmy 8mo ago
Your first link seems like he was just trolling. He says "intelligent design" and then defines it in a way that nobody else would. > What he means by intelligent design is the idea that we are living in a computer simulation. W
34.
by EnergyAmy 9mo ago
You're still not providing any citations, why is that? It's not about what motivates me, it's about the scientific consensus in the field of biology. The same consensus that has remain unchanged for well over a century. I&#x2
35.
by EnergyAmy 9mo ago
I'm literally asking you to get specific so we can talk about particulars, so I'm not sure where you're getting that from. I don't really get the point of this dance you're doing. Why not just admit that you don&#x2
36.
by EnergyAmy 9mo ago
You're still not providing any citations, why is that? Surely you can ask some of the people in field work that you run with. I'm also not sure why you're so focused on Colin Wright when I provided other examples of people af
37.
by EnergyAmy 9mo ago
I look forward to your citations supporting any of your points.
38.
by EnergyAmy 9mo ago
The gamete-based definition of sex is merely a description of reality. I continue to look forward to your citation disputing the truth of what he lays out in that paper, or the other links I provided that affirm the same stance. Ad hominems
39.
by EnergyAmy 9mo ago
You can't legislate reality away. If you're tracking biological sex, then it doesn't matter what a court decides. If you're tracking legal fictions then you might. I look forward to your citation disputing the truth of w
40.
by EnergyAmy 9mo ago
Technically correct, but to be specific sex is binary, not merely bimodal. Sex is entirely defined by gametes, and is binary in anisogamous species such as humans. Isogamous species don't have sexes, they have mating types (and often m
41.
by EnergyAmy 9mo ago
I'm responding specifically to your comment in regards to "but if you want to talk about biology then" followed by a list of biological variations that don't dispute the sex binary. The goalposts are exactly where you&#x
42.
by EnergyAmy 9mo ago
You and the other person are probably talking past each other. For most people, "gender" is merely the polite way of saying "sex", and that's probably what the other commenter was referring to. Gender in the sense o
43.
by EnergyAmy 9mo ago
XXY/etc are all variations within a sex. The above poster is correct to point out that sex is defined entirely by the gamete size that one's body is organized around producing in anisogamous species like humans, and is binary. I
44.
by EnergyAmy 10mo ago
Sorry but cars are the worst form of transportation. Not even a "worst except for all the rest", just straight terrible. The US has finally realized how colossal of a mistake it's made over the past few decades and is startin
45.
by EnergyAmy 10mo ago
I like the language saying "it's not as easy as you think" when I'm about to do something ill-advised like roll my own mutable tree structure.
46.
by EnergyAmy 1y ago
Is something troubling you? What are your feelings now?
47.
by EnergyAmy 1y ago
Tell me more about that. I'm not sure I understand you fully.
48.
by EnergyAmy 1y ago
Does talking about this bother you?
49.
by EnergyAmy 1y ago
We were discussing you, not me. Are We going to Chat?
50.
by EnergyAmy 1y ago
Do you believe it is normal to be not sure how to make this any clearer. you're not going to engage in debate. you've asked for an example from the beginning. An example contains both sides. If me wish to provide an example( and
51.
by EnergyAmy 1y ago
Perhaps you would like to be able to finish it please? Are We going to Chat? I can't help you without a dialog!
52.
by EnergyAmy 1y ago
"By existing I mean ..."
53.
by EnergyAmy 1y ago
As per my previous comment: > Do you agree or disagree that "trans people existing" is too vague to be meaningful? Alternatively, what exactly do you mean by "existing"? A genuine response would be responding to that,
54.
by EnergyAmy 1y ago
I don't really know what to tell you, other than that it would help if you stopped being deliberately obtuse. "Genuine discussion" includes responding to the topic of "trans people existing" by pointing out that &qu
55.
by EnergyAmy 1y ago
Addressing the point. Do you agree or disagree that "trans people existing" is too vague to be meaningful? Alternatively, what exactly do you mean by "existing"?
56.
by EnergyAmy 1y ago
I directly addressed your statement. "Trans people existing" is a vague statement that avoids talking about specifics. Discourse is toxic because of rhetorical tricks like this where you desperately try to avoid actual discussion.
57.
by EnergyAmy 1y ago
Yes
58.
by EnergyAmy 1y ago
Trying to fight "hey guys" is stupid and tilting at windmills. It's a great example of performative wokeness that achieves nothing but making some people feel good about themselves.
59.
by EnergyAmy 1y ago
Not quite that simple because then the lowest wage employees will get spun out into a shell company that contracts to the main company.
60.
by EnergyAmy 1y ago
Humans are really just 3 LLMs in a trenchcoat after all

More ›