EmiDub

5 ms·

1.
by EmiDub 8d ago
Whataboutism isn’t a fallacy and is widely misused online. If someone says “I think x should stop because of y”. It is a valid argumentative response to say “y also occurs with z, so should z also stop?”. It is argumentatively revealing eit
2.
by EmiDub 3mo ago
> Cost of revenue is lower than revenue. I’m not sure how people are looking at numbers that show, even if we wipe off the enormous R&D expenditures, they are still in the red for inference + sales/marketing + admin and respon
3.
by EmiDub 10mo ago
Right, but unlike with social products (where the network of users is essential) or transportation/food delivery (where providers will follow the user volume) I just don’t see any stickiness benefit for OpenAI. A user’s conversation hi
4.
by EmiDub 10mo ago
A moat defends your business, if you lose more money the more users you have, the number of users is not a moat.
5.
by EmiDub 10mo ago
Not according to the FT and Ed Zitron: https://www.ft.com/content/fce77ba4-6231-4920-9e99-693a6c38e... https://www.wheresyoured.at/oai_docs/
6.
by EmiDub 10mo ago
How is the number of users a moat when you are losing money on every user?
7.
by EmiDub 1y ago
Can someone give me an explanation for why Mike Cardwell, who lives in the UK, blocks Iranian IPs for “your decision to arm Russia with drones so that they can indiscriminately massacre civilians.” but does not block US or UK IPs for their
8.
by EmiDub 1y ago
Why do we keep having these LLM studies that are completely unsurprising. Yes, the probabilistic text generator is more likely to output a correct answer when the input more closely matches its training sources than when you add random nois