Eiim

5 ms·

1.
by Eiim 2y ago
They already have human segmenters segmenting existing scrolls, which presumably is used to train the program in much the same way.
2.
by Eiim 2y ago
You haven't substantiated why nobody else could make use of WebGPU. Are Google the only ones who can understand Beacons because they make $300B/year? GPU is hard, but it doesn't take billions to figure out.
3.
by Eiim 2y ago
Interestingly, if you ever scan a FedEx barcode, they use tons of ASCII separator characters. About the only time I've seen them significantly used though.
4.
by Eiim 2y ago
I'm working on my Master's in Statistics, so I feel I can comment on some of what's going on here (although there are others more experienced than me in the comments as well, and I generally agree with their assessments). I&#
5.
by Eiim 2y ago
I'm actually actively researching the Grimms tales - I'm glad you linked to Zipe's translation! I think he has the most accurate and complete English translation out there, but it's still being frequently overlooked for
6.
by Eiim 2y ago
Nvidia is a great example of why a flat rule like this wouldn't work. Nvidia pretty much just does one, pretty specialized thing (GPUs) and trying to break it up into >10 pieces worth <$20B each (approximate median GDP of African
7.
by Eiim 2y ago
I should say: the real difficulty is service, but if there's any way to get in contact with you, there's at least a chance it will be accepted as good service. There was famously a recent case where a defendant known only by a Bit
8.
by Eiim 2y ago
File a lawsuit against a John/Jane Doe defendant(s) and describe who the defendants are, e.g., the people who code and maintain the emulator. Maybe a little harder than if you had the names but not by a lot.
9.
by Eiim 2y ago
You can still be sued. At that point, you either: a) defend yourself as normal, while attempting to maintain anonymity (difficult & doesn't solve anything) b) let the case go to default judgement (for likely an enormous amount of m
10.
by Eiim 2y ago
Bad evidence is not the same thing as inadmissible evidence. Evidence is admitted, and then the fact finder determines whether to consider it, and how much weight to give it. It is likely that surveillance video will be slightly less credib
11.
by Eiim 3y ago
This is basically just a compression dictionary made up of random noise, which is... a thing that you can do
12.
by Eiim 3y ago
Part of Liebowitz's problem was that he did ~0 research before filing a lawsuit. Often the only thing he did was send the photographer a list of URLs and ask for "GO" or "NO GO" for each one. In at least some cases
13.
by Eiim 3y ago
oend (pronounced "owned") has some potential, surely
14.
by Eiim 3y ago
Very true! I have a friend with a tape backup system and it serves him well.
15.
by Eiim 3y ago
Flash memory relies on cells keeping charged, but the electrons can slowly leak and discharge the cells over time. It looks like the commonly claimed number is 10 years, but there's no clear answer. Hard drives also aren't great a
16.
by Eiim 3y ago
Nothing's disappearing, except the binaries and source. Good-quality archives will surely be assembled, but it at a minimum makes Citra significantly harder to access.
17.
by Eiim 3y ago
Did you read the article? It's about what happens in negative numbers. Of course everyone agrees that 7/2=3 in integer division, but -7/2 is less obvious.
18.
by Eiim 3y ago
Indeed, which is why I felt the need to call it out here. I'm not certain if the files on question actually happened to be valid C but whether that's a meaningful mistake regardless is left to the reader to decide.
19.
by Eiim 3y ago
I ran a quick test on 100 semi-random files I had laying around. Of those, 81 were detected correctly, 6 were detected as the wrong file type, and 12 were detected with an unspecific file type (unknown binary/generic text) when a more
20.
by Eiim 3y ago
From elsewhere in this thread, it appears that Magika detects far fewer file types than file (116 vs ~1600), which makes sense. For file, you just need to drop in a few rules to add a new, somewhat obscure type. An AI approach like Magika w
21.
by Eiim 3y ago
Sure, the images on this page are where I noticed it: https://chainswordcs.com/e-reader-protos.html No doubt URL encoding is frustrating, good luck taking it on!
22.
by Eiim 3y ago
There's a bit of a "bug" I found where Bernard interprets backslashes in file paths literally and URL-encodes them as %5C, whereas modern browsers automatically correct them to /. You could definitely argue that the URL
23.
by Eiim 3y ago
I... What? Is this a bot to auto-respond to any HN message mentioning IPTV with a Chat-GPT generated sales pitch? This is obviously not relevant to my comment.
24.
by Eiim 3y ago
I'll go ahead and put in a request for my own repo: Eiim/Chokistream In the meantime, I have a different bit of feedback: the categories don't make much sense to me. I can't find a consistent theme in "Tooling"
25.
by Eiim 3y ago
Also, I don't use the services that they're combining for hours a day anyways? So I have a hard time seeing why I would with Texts. And for 50¢/day... I can switch between a couple tabs every once in a while.
26.
by Eiim 3y ago
I quite like this! I see a lot of people quoting the line "I have very high and unusual standards" and only paying attention to the first adjective. It's obvious that many of the things people are complaining about are simply
27.
by Eiim 3y ago
More importantly, "During the peak of its efficiency, MOXIE produced 12 grams of oxygen an hour at 98% purity or better." I don't know what the requirements for peak efficiency are, but in theory it could sustain 6 people ind
28.
by Eiim 3y ago
Hey, I'm the person who made SmilApple (typo'd here as SmllApple)! Super great to see my quick and dirty project used like this, I just wish I'd thought of it first https://github.com/Eiim/SmilApple
29.
by Eiim 3y ago
Citing tools is maybe not tradition, but it's gaining popularity. R, for example, has 320,000 cites. ( https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=1605575084878280829... )
30.
by Eiim 3y ago
According to the paper, both words coexisted during Old English. It is less concerned about how they got there and more interested in how with took over once they were both established.

More ›