Dzugaru

7 ms·

1.
by Dzugaru 2mo ago
Depends on the way you play can be a time sink, or session-like game. It is extremely deep and complex to learn from scratch though. I've made some of the best friends playing it when I had time, friendship formed out of high stakes in
2.
by Dzugaru 3mo ago
Outstanding work! I've participated in the challenge, but didn't get far. One of the questions I had at the time was - if I'm going to use ML to detect ink, could it invent hallucinated letters, or even parts of text, and how
3.
by Dzugaru 4mo ago
How much time do you lose when doing things like "verify plan with a second clean agent" instead of just reading and fixing it yourself in 5 min? How much understanding do you lose? How do you manage to treat it "as an engine
4.
by Dzugaru 4mo ago
I did vibe code jam 59 entry with friends, the spirit of the rules there's a lot more lax. We didn't even get to top 100, but that's mostly due to gamedesign errors, not tech. This is the first entry in years which was vibeco
5.
by Dzugaru 4mo ago
It's not only CTFs. I strongly believe being a programmer at a gamejam like Ludum Dare, or hackathons is pretty much over.
6.
by Dzugaru 8mo ago
But how is that less work and allows you to do that in Disneyland with your kids? For me, personally, there is little difference between "speccing out everything in excruciating detail in spec docs" and "writing actual implem
7.
by Dzugaru 10mo ago
This is so far from an absolute worst-case scenario. You could have a codebase subtly broken on so many levels that you cannot fix it without starting from scratch - losing months. You could slowly lose your ability to think and judge.
8.
by Dzugaru 1y ago
I have a feeling this is somehow different. The tool is broad enough, that I don't have to think myself in a wide variety of tasks, not just one. Which hurts my intelligence way more.
9.
by Dzugaru 1y ago
There is no hidden state in a recurrent nets sense. Each new token just has all the previous tokens and that’s it.
10.
by Dzugaru 1y ago
Most critical piece of information I couldn’t find is - how many shot was this? Could it understand the solution is correct by itself (one-shot)? Or did it have just great math intuition and knowledge? How the solutions were validated if it
11.
by Dzugaru 1y ago
This is really interesting, because I do gamejams from time to time - and I try every time to make it work, but I'm still quite a lot faster doing stuff myself. This is visible under extreme time pressure of producing a working game in
12.
by Dzugaru 1y ago
> just as humans shouldn’t serve as calculators But they definitely could and were [0]. You just employ multiple, and cross check - with the ability of every single one to also double check and correct errors. LLMs cannot double check, a
13.
by Dzugaru 1y ago
Not possible, because can't be guardrailed with 100% accuracy. You'll ask it something outside of the Warcraft world (e.g. US politics), and it'll happily oblige. I imagine NPCs will generate really weird immersion breaking s
14.
by Dzugaru 2y ago
Used to live near Japan, in a 5-story concrete building. We had so many earthquakes, the things were getting thrown off the shelves multiple times a year. There is nowhere to leave for a week. And there is a very slim chance anything would
15.
by Dzugaru 2y ago
If we can create a human-level intelligence in the computer - it would already be superintelligence. No human on Earth is capable of reading and remembering Internet scale corpus of data, or doing math at GHz speeds, etc.
16.
by Dzugaru 2y ago
Start with game jams. When you're constrained to make a complete game in 48/72 hours, suddenly you start to understand what's important and what's not. Granted, I haven't done any doors in my jam games yet =)
17.
by Dzugaru 3y ago
There are far more games that were made with Unity, not Unreal, I would even say an order of magnitude more. So I don't really get your point? Unity is vastly easier to jump on, so a lot more people actually make games and test things
18.
Ask HN: Books about security/wargames/CTFs?
1 points by Dzugaru 3y ago|0 comments
19.
by Dzugaru 3y ago
He actually mentions the tool [0] that has all of this, in the end. It records your screen and compiles a demo that runs in any browser by the looks of it. [0] https://www.terminalizer.com
20.
by Dzugaru 3y ago
Yeah I'm aware of the criticism of that tweet, it may not completely make sense mathematically, but I just liked it because it's how I feel about GPT4. It "diverges" while my human mind seemingly is different in some way
21.
by Dzugaru 3y ago
It definitely can "understand" things is some way, however I'm pretty sure ReAct or similar will give it just a nudge forward and the underlying problem of it hallucinating and not being "lucid enough" is not so eas
22.
by Dzugaru 3y ago
It was already trained like this, RLHF [0] is a loop that has ways to feed it the information to "move forward" - update its weights. It was fine-tuned like this. It certainly did ignite something - maybe sparks of AGI, maybe just
23.
by Dzugaru 3y ago
> but could be fixed How? The problem is known for a while, for example this article [0] mentions it (as Chain of Thought reasoning). You could think that just having a scratchpad of tokens is enough - you can arguably plan, backtrack an
24.
by Dzugaru 4y ago
Async/await in C# is a leaky abstraction though. There is a great writeup on this here https://journal.stuffwithstuff.com/2015/02/01/what-color-is-...
25.
by Dzugaru 4y ago
I've just watched the Microsoft 365 copilot presentation. They never mentioned hallucinations, and talked about errors maybe once? This thing will definitely make stupid errors and will make up things when summarizing, doing presentati
26.
by Dzugaru 4y ago
I'm not so sure about this. Text is the universal interface to almost anything imaginable. You can easily embed ChatGPT into a robot, describe the robot text-based API to it and give it a task you like - and it will walk around doing t
27.
by Dzugaru 4y ago
You're not taking into consideration how the actual artists actually feel. And, from the first hand - the feeling is horrible. Most artists love to draw, the process itself is incredibly satisfying. Just like a musician loves his instr
28.
by Dzugaru 4y ago
Absolutely this - I was completely blown away by the technology since it was a long long childhood dream for me (to fly or control something flying remotely). I've flown the thing off the top of the volcano (at 3000 meters), and in hea
29.
by Dzugaru 4y ago
I've heard a story from a friend that was in an accident like that. A police officer who did the paperwork smiled and said "It's the most common type of accident - people just stop paying attention to the car in front that st
30.
by Dzugaru 4y ago
ChatGPT actually showed me how much I'm frustrated with Google nowadays. It gave me a glimpse of what real question answering can be - and it's not opening 10+ tabs and endlessly reformulating the query in hopes something relevant

More ›