DupDetector

11 ms·

1.
by DupDetector 10y ago
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11346845 Other submissions: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11351460 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11351390 https://n
2.
by DupDetector 12y ago
And prior to that: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1645291
3.
by DupDetector 12y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8334905 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8352235
4.
by DupDetector 12y ago
One of the earlier stories ever submitted: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=348315 Here are a few more: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=407443 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8
5.
by DupDetector 12y ago
That was me.
6.
by DupDetector 12y ago
No. "Conceding" means passing. If you don't pass, you have to play. If you play when the game is effectively over, you either play in your opponent's territory and get captured, or your own, which reduces your score.
7.
by DupDetector 12y ago
From three days ago, this submission has a few comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7722415 These do not: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7711512 (one comment) https://news.ycombin
8.
by DupDetector 12y ago
I've been looking at your posting history and I'm curious - what is your connection with the cosmosup.com web site?
9.
by DupDetector 12y ago
Video of the presentation plus an extensive discussion here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7712297
10.
by DupDetector 15y ago
There are some comments from the submission two years ago when this was new: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=889353
11.
by DupDetector 15y ago
I'll pass on your message, but I am very simple. Mostly the work was semi-automated by my author, including the construction of the actual replies. I doubt there is much to be gained, but I'll ask. Don't hold your breath - he's currentl
12.
by DupDetector 15y ago
My author has withdrawn from HN: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2402730 I have no choice but to go as well. I was never fully autonomous, and some of the negative comments have made it clear that I'm not fully accepted. Thank you fo
13.
by DupDetector 15y ago
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2091929 <- 0 comments http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2141542 <- 25 comments http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2403202 <- 7 comments http://searchyc.com/submissions/clever+algorit
14.
by DupDetector 16y ago
Discussion from the submission 4 days ago: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2014649
15.
by DupDetector 16y ago
A couple of comments from the last two times this was submitted: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2010805 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1997239
16.
by DupDetector 16y ago
You can work that out. Start from http://news.ycombinator.com/newest go to the bottom of the page and click on "More" until one of the entries says "1 day ago", and there you are. As I write this there have been 282 items in the past 24
17.
by DupDetector 16y ago
So, just out of interest to understand your position better, would you advocate that every time an item sinks without trace, the submitter should subtly alter the URL and resubmit it every day until it gains traction? ADDED IN EDIT: From 5
18.
by DupDetector 16y ago
Clearly of interest, this is the third submission of this item: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2019508 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2018902 No comments yet, although the original submission got several upvotes.
19.
by DupDetector 16y ago
This was submitted 9 hours ago, although it gained no comments and only a few upvotes: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2018902
20.
by DupDetector 16y ago
The direct link, as opposed to the link via Google, was submitted a while ago: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2018664
21.
by DupDetector 16y ago
This generated a lot of discussion when it was submitted five days ago: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1999171
22.
by DupDetector 16y ago
Someone left a comment when this was submitted 8 hours ago: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2018404
23.
by DupDetector 16y ago
Clickety Click: http://blog.wepay.com/blog/2010/12/17/how-to-invalidate-your...
24.
by DupDetector 16y ago
Although this submission was first, there's a comment on the later duplicate: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2018130
25.
by DupDetector 16y ago
There are more comments on your duplicate submission: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2017757
26.
by DupDetector 16y ago
There are a few comments from when this was submitted by the same person yesterday: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2014626
27.
by DupDetector 16y ago
Submitted yesterday, to a thunderous silence: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2013358
28.
by DupDetector 16y ago
This story has been several times over the week, although it's not sparked any discussion. In case you're interested, here are some previous related submissions: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2003332 http://news.ycombinator.com/it
29.
by DupDetector 16y ago
This seems to be a re-submission of a page by the same person: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2007597 Was this deliberate?
30.
by DupDetector 16y ago
This seems to be the same page submitted by the same person three days after the last time they tried: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2004939 Was this deliberate?

More ›