Dudeman112

7 ms·

1.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
>Also, you are calling something out without providing what -you- would do in the situation? If someone uses 1+1=3 as an argument you don't need to figure out an actual answer to point out their argument is bollocks >What you&#x2
2.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
>If the death penalty had been applied, there's no "undo" button. There's no "undo" button for wasting away for 40 years in prison either To me it looks like a glitch of the human cognition to think that los
3.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
I think you're underestimating just how many True Believers generations of omnipresent Jingoism can create
4.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
Absolutely bonkers algorithms that no one can make sense of unless they dedicate time to study and debug it Also, it will have to be scrapped when anyone wants to tweak it a little. Sure monkeys randomly typing on a typewriter will eventual
5.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
>It is what those words mean. It is literal. >I'm not sure these were needed The original wording I was gonna use before deciding to be more considerate was "small children and autists" If you can think of another short
6.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
>What does this sentence even mean lmao >if you say something is unlimited I'm going to take your word for it The sentence refers to people like you. It doesn't make you incredibly clever to consider those sentences literall
7.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
There's always an individual with autism-level consideration for what one says, isn't there? No, effectively DDOS-ing a service just because it says it's free and unlimited is a dick move People like those are a big reason fo
8.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
>There's really no data on that I find it extremely unlikely that there's no data on how being an outcast affects one's mental health
9.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
No, I stand by it Right now you are already forced to pick 'no'. It's a button that lets things go the way so many people claim to be necessary and proper. They can own up to deliberately choosing our current reality if the
10.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
You can always say "no" when it asks if you want to continue life, unlike in Lena as some other commenter mentioned Better than current reality, where "no" is shoved on your throat and most people insist you better be gr
11.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
>I don't want to see people die, but on the other hand I fully understand that we must die Those are not mutually compatible Well, unless you take some esoteric interpretation where one can be absolved from the immediate implication
12.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
What do you mean? Looks to me like you are reacting to the title instead of the article I expected the standard anti-medicine fare from the title, but got neat biological investigation/hacking instead. That was an interesting read
13.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
Which cycle of self pity? I'm a sadistic fuck that's been made to have the caring range of a rock due to childhood abuse I'm fine being that way, it's just not conductive to maintaining relationships. Been there, done th
14.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
The "be the real you" crowd never quite has a good answer for "what if the real you is an unlovable, broken piece of shit?", do they?
15.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
>If it can't even do an NGINX config, what use is it for anything else? Turn it around. I'm sure there are lots of people around who couldn't do it either, even with a ridiculously high amount of time to do it
16.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
Is that solved for American websites?
17.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
Whenever people mention the awful state of the industry, I feel an urge to point out that the only thing that matters in a capitalist society is what the consumer votes for with their wallet Ubisoft is far from bankrupt. EA is far from bank
18.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
You mean the parts of the world where seasonal affective disorders are a blight on their society? Personally I severely underestimated the effect of large periods of time without sunlight, before going through it myself
19.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
"It" can't be normal by definition if only a handful of people were "it" in the whole history of mankind
20.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
But then how are you gonna have a one-person IT department if your developer doesn't know Linux?
21.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
I'm on mobile. The tabular data did not work, obviously Ironic
22.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
>For some reason newspapers/magazines never provide a good reference to the actual article and you end up having to go hunting That seriously annoys me to no end Does anyone know why the heck don't they just provide the damn DO
23.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
>words do still mean things. They don't if there's no consensus And I'm sure you ain't got the authority needed to affirm that those definitions are commonly used in those ways
24.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
Ah, the age-old mixing pointing out the reasons for why an individual might act they way they do with morally absolving them Ever common amongst people who have never seen or felt the consequences of abject poverty
25.
by Dudeman112 3y ago
!important is like global variables Sure they have their place, but goddamnit do some people abuse them and make huge messes with them :(
26.
by Dudeman112 4y ago
>Seem you have a very inflated view of the programs... just how much debt are you attempting to justify? I agree with them and I had 0 debt. Making higher education free was one of the few things I think the government back home actually
27.
by Dudeman112 4y ago
Yes, there's a big overlap between "learning" and "indoctrination". For mysterious reasons we only care about not being indoctrination when it comes to adults or almost adults People wouldn't learn anything i
28.
by Dudeman112 4y ago
>There is literally nothing stopping a 20 year old human who lives in Western society from growing their intellectual soul through learning Except for humans in general being utterly shite at pursuing learning without guidance or an im
29.
by Dudeman112 4y ago
Yes. Being engineered or not is completely orthogonal to the discussion >Because the neural networks are much closer to discovered than engineered So is most code. Programmers in general can't engineer for shit, (half blindly) guide
30.
by Dudeman112 4y ago
That's because AI is an awful expression :| Should have always been called "fancy algorithms" from the get-go, calling it "intelligence" opens the interpretation up for a world of misunderstandings

More ›