Dude2023

9 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by Dude2023 9y ago

   Still sounds less financially risky then e.g. marrying with kids in same country which is way more mainstream. Unless you start playing with debt.
2. 2.▲
   by Dude2023 9y ago

   I wonder which engine it works best with...
3. 3.▲
   by Dude2023 9y ago

   It compiles now? I thought it was a C++ transpiler.
4. 4.▲
   by Dude2023 9y ago

   Three kids will benefit from a dad who learned to drive slower.
5. 5.▲
   by Dude2023 9y ago

   Reminded me about keyset art: https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=94482.0
6. 6.▲
   by Dude2023 9y ago

   Desire to easily buy GPUs for gaming at a reasonable price!
7. 7.▲
   by Dude2023 9y ago

   Participating in cults is profitable for a subset of cultists.
8. 8.▲
   by Dude2023 9y ago

   Whatever the price crypto currency cultists will buy them all.
9. 9.▲
   by Dude2023 9y ago

   Interesting, I wonder whether dynamically adjustable lenses can be used to treat vision problems.
10. 10.▲
    by Dude2023 9y ago

    > automated filtering of code would make software less reliable and more expensive I can see how it's bad for business, but as a developer wouldn't it mean more jobs and more of custom libraries to make?
11. 11.▲
    by Dude2023 9y ago

    > This is because JS is a good choice for most things. That's why it's one of few languages: 1) with mainstream transpilation; 2) more than one transpiler.
12. 12.▲
    by Dude2023 9y ago

    Musk is more like Thomas Edison.
13. 13.▲
    by Dude2023 9y ago

    A required thought-piece for all JavaScript devs. Enjoy monopoly while it lasts, but be humble.