Drip33

5 ms·

1.
by Drip33 6y ago
Another example of a great sub: /r/kidneystones sad face noises
2.
by Drip33 6y ago
What if I own the company and it's an acceptable Terms of Service use? What if I'm unemployed? Should I still be fired?
3.
by Drip33 6y ago
I have access to some marketing data and for fun, select * from mobile_location where latitude between 38.88778433380732 and 38.891917997746894 and longitude between -77.01269830654866 and -77.00613225870377 and epoch_timestamp between 1609
4.
by Drip33 6y ago
I found this page useful to test how code I've written handles unusual characters.
5.
Page contains characters from each of the Unicode character blocks(ltg.ed.ac.uk)
1 points by Drip33 6y ago|1 comments
6.
by Drip33 6y ago
?l?d mask with I think 9 characters using default Android OS with updates. Both phones I think were minimum Android 5.0+ because that is when they switched to Scrypt to store password/encryption keys.
7.
by Drip33 6y ago
Galaxy S7 - online and cracked, Galaxy S4 - offline and not cracked ~2017-2019
8.
by Drip33 6y ago
My powered on phone was 0day'd by Cellibrite according to internal Law Enforcement emails in disclosure and my powered down phone was not supported at all. Edit: The cracked phone has been in my possession for a while now and I've
9.
by Drip33 6y ago
If you can generate the private key to a 27 character or longer English readable Bitcoin address then you can use the same magical technology you possess to earn far more than $1 billion USD.
10.
by Drip33 6y ago
This address has no known private key https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1BitcoinEaterAddressD... Sure someone could randomly guess it but not likely. You don't need to have or know a private key to gene
11.
by Drip33 6y ago
What I wrote about is forfeiture which doesn't include criminal penalties. Most of the American (which I am not) federal press releases I read about have a maximum $250,000 fine per count. Here is a random press release from justice.go
12.
by Drip33 6y ago
Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20927197 > Also forfeiture doesn't account for the fact that you may have paid capital gains tax. I feel like they really shafted me on that one. As someone
13.
by Drip33 6y ago
Neither but yes you're right for both.
14.
by Drip33 6y ago
> Is this a CFAA violation? No hashes were cracked Cracking hashes alone is not a crime or I'd be in jail.
15.
by Drip33 6y ago
> I guess the "modern" browser fixes this for everyone else not using a ("modern") proxy. Only if the site owner wants it so https://hstspreload.org/
16.
by Drip33 6y ago
There's a lot they can do, but then it makes it impossible to search your inbox for old emails by subject, from, to etc fields. You can reduce what an adversary sees by not including anything useful in the subject line and the only thi
17.
by Drip33 6y ago
I'm assuming the computer is "locked" but online, and no users consent to logging in to run anything. Will any of these methods still work if Firewire drivers are disabled?
18.
by Drip33 6y ago
I thought that wasn't possible since DDR3 or 4?
19.
by Drip33 6y ago
>If you can get a dump of the computer active memory you can ultimately get the decryption keys on consumer hardware What methods are available to get a memory dump if Firewire is disabled? Feds couldn't break my encryption after ~1
20.
by Drip33 6y ago
Take it further. If you witness a car from Tesla or any other publicly traded corp spontaneously combust on the side of the road and you know it will result in massive recalls before the general public and then short the stock, is that insi
21.
by Drip33 6y ago
That requires some sort of malware (or similar) installed on the device/software creating the transactions which has access to the private key to leak it via some predetermined way and is different from what I thought you were saying t
22.
by Drip33 6y ago
>The fun bit is that the signer can backdoor transactions, and that part isn't something that can be verified by anybody who doesn't have the private keys. Can you explain this? This is contrary to my knowledge of reviewing the
23.
by Drip33 6y ago
Looks still unconfirmed https://decrypt.co/32145/hackers-blackmail-exchange-with-5-m... >In short, the researchers claim that the hackers have gained access to an exchange’s funds. They are able to send money to cer
24.
by Drip33 6y ago
I've never heard of someone successfully and unintentionally fat fingering a Bitcoin address typo to a valid Bitcoin address nobody owns. Fee box is a different thing, the recent $2.5m ETH headline you saw was not an accident but an at
25.
by Drip33 6y ago
Probably just twice. Bitcoin addresses are check summed so it's nearly impossible to fat finger a mistake.
26.
by Drip33 6y ago
>Something like r/watchpeopledie, they don't have to censor, and it seems contained. I wouldn't want to visit it, not more than once, it may not be healthy in general, but taking it down seems to be "just" censor
27.
by Drip33 6y ago
Was the write a shell php file portion of the video/exploit patched? Sites like https://sqliteonline.com/ and https://inloop.github.io/sqlite-viewer/ could be perpetually vulnerable if not?
28.
by Drip33 6y ago
>This headline is very misleading I was not sure if I am allowed to editorialize titles a bit but I agree because they are still sworn officers. If dang is around, he should change it.
29.
by Drip33 6y ago
>The announcement comes one day after two members were suspended without pay when a video surfaced, showing them pushing over a 75-year-old protestor, causing injury. >“Fifty-seven resigned in disgust because of the treatment of two o
30.
Police Unit Resigns in Protest(investigativepost.org)
8 points by Drip33 6y ago|8 comments

More ›